Categories
Widget Image
Trending
Recent Posts
Monday, Oct 19th, 2026
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 840)

Main Nikla Gaddi Leke and Udd Jaa Kaale Kaava were originally composed by Uttam Singh.

Uttam Singh shared that his consent was not taken by the makers of Gadar 2 before remaking his songs for the sequel.

Anil Sharma’s Gadar 2 became a smashing hit as fans were eager to see Sunny Deol and Ameesha Patel reprise their roles as Tara Singh and Sakeena respectively. The lead actors were not the only elements that the director retained from the original film. He also recreated the iconic songs Main Nikla Gaddi Leke and Udd Jaa Kaale Kaava for the sequel. While the original tracks were composed by Uttam Singh, the music director recently claimed that he was not even approached for the sequel.

Talking to Amar Ujala, Uttam Singh said, “They didn’t call me for Gadar 2 and I don’t have the habit of calling and asking for work. They have used two of my songs in the film and I have also heard that they have used the background music that I composed. They should at least have the etiquette to ask me once and talk to me before using my songs in the film.”

The songs for the sequel have been composed by Mithoon. While the latest rendition of Main Nikla Gaddi Leke has the vocals of the original singer Udit Narayan, his son Aditya Narayan and Mithoon have also lent their voices to the song. On the other hand, Udd Jaa Kaale Kaava’s both new and original renditions have been sung by Udit Narayan and Alka Yagnik.

Both songs struck a special chord with the audience after the release of the 2001 film Gadar: Ek Prem Katha. The latest versions in the sequel Gadar 2 also won over the audiences’ hearts.

Gadar 2 released on August 11 and quickly became one of the most successful post-pandemic theatrical releases. The film earned a whopping Rs 40 crore on its opening day. The film has surpassed the Rs 400 crore mark at the Indian box office in only 12 days since its release. It is now inching close to Rs 500 crore mark.

Source link

Main Nikla Gaddi Leke and Udd Jaa

Amidst a batch of new big screen delays, fans have an update on whether The Marvels will follow suit. 

Set to release on November 10, Captain Marvel 2 is the MCU’s third and final film of 2023, featuting a rare ensemble centered on Brie Larson, WandaVision‘s Teyonah Parris, and Ms. Marvel‘s Iman Vellani. 

The problem is the entertainment industry is in the midst of the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes, the latter of which prevents actors from participating in promotional campaigns and is leading to delays. 

Captain Marvel 2 Receives Release Update

Marvel

On the heels of Dune: Part Two and other late 2023 movies being pushed back, Deadline reported The Marvels is keeping its November 10 release date.

Other films which have been delayed include Kraven the Hunter, Deadpool 3, Gladiator 2, Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse, and more. 

If the strikes continues, 2024 films are likely to be pushed back as well, particularly those which were in the midst of production when the shutdowns began. 

Interestingly enough, there was speculation that The Marvels could release earlier as opposed to later. 

Due to Dune: Part Two‘s new 2024 date, The Marvels releasing on November 3 instead of November 10 would offer new IMAX availability and less competition with The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes. 

However, according to this report, Disney seemingly has no interest in a Captain Marvel sequel premiere that’s neither early nor late. 

Why Disney Isn’t Moving The Marvels

This isn’t the first fans have heard of Marvel Studios sticking to The Marvels current release. 

Earlier this month, Disney’s earnings report showed Captain Marvel 2 still listed for November 10. And, despite Brie Larson’s star power and fan love for Iman Vellani, Marvel Studios’ promotion for the film has been ongoing without the film’s cast. 

Still, The Marvels isn’t the only tentpole film sticking to its calendar date. 

Warner Bros.’ Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom still has an official release date of December 20, 2023; however, that may be due to it’s longstanding history of delays, the studio’s recent string of flops, and Aquaman 2‘s status as the last DCEU film. 

Whether the decision to keep The Marvels at November 10 stems from a similiar motivation – or is actually a move of confidence – is unknown.  

For the time being, The Marvels arrives in theaters on Friday, November 10. 

Source link

Unstoppable Doom Patrol #5 (of 7)
Writer: Dennis Culver
Artist:
Chris Burnham
Colour Artist: Brian Reber
Letterer:
Pat Brosseau
Reviewed by Davydh Tidey

After the therapy session we saw last issue, Unstoppable Doom Patrol #5 puts us right back into the action, going up against the evil corporation using the newly-discovered metahumans for profit. The Lazarus Rain has changed so much about the world, but even it can’t stop the slow trudge of capitalism. 

Also, someone let Niles Caulder out into the field. This can only go well, I’m sure.

Positives

This series really only goes from strength to strength and the latest issue’s no exception. This chapter turns the classic evil corporation trope on it’s head and delivers a fairly thought-provoking message about the dark side of superpowers; someone will always try to use them for profit, in sometimes horrifying ways. 

The issue also addresses the rather large elephant in the room; Niles Caulder. While he’s no longer the Chief, the former Doom patrol leader’s still around in an advisory capacity. This, obviously, presents its own dangers, particularly with him being the direct reason for the accidents that created the Doom Patrol in the first place. The new Chief seems to have a handle on him, but who knows what he could do next and how he could influence things, and who he could put in danger to prove another theory? The situation’s tenuous, to say the least. 

This issue also does something rather unique for Niles Caulder, as it has him admit that he was wrong about something. We’re shown a side to this immoral, arrogant character that we haven’t seen before; genuine remorse and owning his mistakes. 

I know I asked for more Niles Caulder, Dennis, but DAMN, I didn’t expect this! 

Along with humanizing the inhumane, Dennis Culver delivers another amazing issue here. Caulder’s characterization is nailed, giving us all the flaws of the man while still progressing him forward and showing genuine development.

Elasti-Girl and Robotman still continue to struggle with being professional in the field, but deliver the results in spectacular fashion anyway. The relationships between characters in Unstoppable Doom Patrol have always been a highlight, each one is unique and well thought out. Cliff doesn’t talk to Rita like he does with Larry, and Larry doesn’t talk to Beast Girl the same way he talks to the Chief. All of this makes the dialogue so natural and easy to buy into, I love it. 

It’s lovely to have Chris Burnham back with Brian Reber on the art, as I’ve sorely missed his dynamic feeling action and unique facial expressions. The pages with the “new superhero” are equal parts thrilling and horrifying, and I’ve come to expect nothing less from this art team and this amazing book in general.

Negatives

This is a very small gripe in the grand scheme of things, but I’d really like to see Beast Girl’s character developed a little further. We’ve seen her touching origin story, and as the lead character in Unstoppable Doom Patrol #2, but I’d love to see more from her and get more of a real sense of her character. 

Apart from that, this series only has two more issues left?! Boo! I’ll miss it sorely when it’s gone. 

Conclusion

Unstoppable Doom Patrol #5 is a really great distillation of what this whole series has been about; overcoming your past and pushing forward. This issue made Niles Caulder face his demons, but the whole series feels like it’s been about addressing trauma and past mistakes, while also helping as many metahumans as possible. It’s a positive, and relatable, message for people of this generation. Your past doesn’t define you. 

I have nothing but love for this series, and this issue is no exception. 

Images Courtesy of DC Entertainment

Source link

171 Unstoppable Doom Patrol #5 (of 7) Writer: Dennis

Former President Donald Trump is back on Twitter (now X) more than two years after he was banned from the platform in the aftermath of the January 6th Capitol riot. On August 24th, 2023, Trump tweeted for the first time since the website reinstated his account on November 19th, 2022. His first post? An image with the mug shot taken when he was booked at the Fulton County jail in Georgia on charges that he conspired to overturn the results of 2020 Presidential elections. 

The image also says “Election Interference” and “Never Surrender!,” along with a URL of his website. Trump linked to his website in the tweet, as well, where his mug shot is also prominently featured with a lengthy note that starts with: “Today, at the notoriously violent jail in Fulton County, Georgia, I was ARRESTED despite having committed NO CRIME.”

In November last year, Musk appeared to make the decision to reinstate Trump’s account based on the results of a Twitter poll. He asked people to vote on whether Trump should have access to his account returned. At the end of 24 hours, the option to reinstate the former president won with 51.8 percent of a decision that saw more than 15 million votes. Musk admitted at the time that some of the action on the poll came from “bot and troll armies.” Prior to the poll, Musk also said the decision on whether to reinstate Trump would come from a newly formed moderation council, but he never followed through on that pledge.

The website then known as Twitter banned Trump in early 2021 after he broke the company’s rules against inciting violence. The initial suspension saw Trump lose access to his account for 12 hours, but days later, the company made the decision permanent. At first, Trump tried to skirt the ban, even going so far as to file a lawsuit against Twitter that ultimately failed. Following his de-platforming from Twitter, Facebook and other social media websites, Trump went on to create Truth Social. Following his reinstatement, Trump said he didn’t “see any reason” to return to the platform. That said, the promise of reaching a huge audience with something as dramatic as a mug shot was obviously too good for Trump to pass up, particularly with what is likely to be a messy Republican primary on the horizon.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission. All prices are correct at the time of publishing.

Source link

Former President Donald Trump is back on

Following his arrest in Fulton County, Ga. on charges related to alleged attempts to overturn his 2020 election loss in the state, former president Donald Trump was processed, released on bond and got back to posting. After more than two years since his last words on the social media platform X, née Twitter, Trump shared a new update from his official account.

The post features the mug shot of Trump that was released by the Fulton County Sheriff’s Office shortly after. Along with an entirely capitalized link to Trump’s official 2024 campaign website, the post also includes the messages “ELECTION INTERFERENCE” and “NEVER SURRENDER!”

Trump surrendered himself to Fulton County law enforcement on Thursday evening, flying from New York to Georgia to be arrested. 18 of the former president’s confidantes were also charged earlier this month under Georgia’s racketeering laws, marking the fourth indictment of Trump since March.

Twitter banned the then-president on Jan. 8, 2021, two days after the U.S. Capitol was stormed by a group of several thousand Trump supporters that sought to prevent the certification of Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election by halting the counting of Electoral College votes. The social media platform cited that the decision was made “due to the risk of further incitement of violence,” following Trump’s public assertions that the election result was fraudulent. Trump has since been indicted over his alleged involvement in the Jan. 6 riots.

However, Elon Musk reinstated Trump’s account on Twitter last November, shortly following the multi-billionaire’s acquisition of the social media company. While Trump had praised Musk’s takeover, the former president had voiced an unwillingness to return to Twitter, instead continuing his primary social media presence on his own platform Truth Social.

After nearly 10 months — and a renaming of the product from “Twitter” to “X” — Trump has made a surprise return to the social media platform, though whether he remains active there is an uncertainty.

Source link

Following his arrest in Fulton County, Ga.

What We Do In The Shadows can be a bit of a tease at times. The show’s short-term storytelling is some of the best, and the swiftest, in all of TV, with individual episodes jumping from plot point to absurd plot point as quickly as its writers and stars can spew them out. Hand that same crew a bit of season-long narrative content, though, and one of TV’s fleetest comedies gets sluggish way faster than you might expect

Which is to say that “The Roast”—which goes in hard on the fifth season’s Guillermo-focused myth arc—is a funny and effective episode in the short term (with a fantastic central performance from regular guest star Doug Jones), but basically inert in the long. Which wouldn’t be half so frustrating if the show wasn’t constantly invoking the language and tropes of serialized storytelling to create an illusion of something a bit more meaty, before dipping back to the exact same “Nandor acts like he knows Guillermo’s secret but he’s just being an idiot” joke that finished out “Urgent Care.”

But we’re tackling this backwards, so let’s rewind: The Vampire Residence is up in arms this week over Laszlo, who seems to be trapped in an inescapable funk. (In one of the episode’s best exchanges, Nadja asserts that “We are down to like only 16 fucks a week!” with Nandor chiming in with “We are down to just 3.” The best touch is Nadja reaching out a hand to him in saddened solidarity.) Everyone in the house assumes it’s because of their own particular stressors taking their toll on Lasz, whether it’s Nadja’s hex, Guillermo’s slow transformation into a vampire, or, in a very funny callback, Colin Robinson revealing that he’s been having bizarre dreams of Laszlo being his daddy. (“Oh, that is actually because that did happen, Colin Robinson.” “I think I would remember Laszlo wiping my bottom.”) After a very short run-up, everyone decides that the best solution possible is to organize The Roast Of Laszlo Cravensworth, inviting everyone they know—most importantly, Jones’ Baron Afanas—to get in on the fun.

A weird thing about “The Roast,” though, is that The Roast itself isn’t really either the point or the episode’s highlight. WWDITS isn’t exactly a show where the characters make jokes as jokes—and if they do, it’s usually to set them up to look silly—and watching Nandor, Nadja, and Colin work through the mechanics of awkwardly roasting a nigh-comatose Laszlo, tossing out “You Might Be A Laszlo Cravensworth” gags, and Colin’s typically painful butchering of The Aristocrats, isn’t as fun as it seems like it should be. (Ironically, it’s not hard to imagine Matt Berry absolutely killing this stuff; “The Roast” suffers a bit, throughout, by having a basic premise that neuters so many of Berry’s comedic gifts.)

Things only pick up once The Guide—who gets to talk in this one and everything—spills a whole bunch of secrets to Afanas, including the fact that Guillermo is the one who accidentally burnt him up in the pilot, and that he’s got that pesky Van Helsing blood lurking in his veins. Afanas promptly flips out, wrecking the roast, going on the hunt, and reminding us for a few minutes that this guy—and vampires as a whole, in this universe—can be genuinely scary when they’re not out playing Suburb Dads to a flaming poop-dispensing hellhound.

The episode’s best scenes come from that ensuing confrontation, first as Afanas stalks Guillermo around The Residence and then after, when the two of them both get captured by the rest of the crew and are forced to resolve things fang to fang. Jones is genuinely great in these scenes, mixing Afanas’ charm and menace in unpredictable and enjoyable ways, while Harvey Guillén is good as ever as a voice of reason. (Guillén, Jones, and Kayvan Novak do a great job of tapping in to the episode’s more heartfelt moments amidst the violence.) We also get some ace and grotesque visuals, as Afanas dumps a dead Guillermo on the foyer carpet—only for Laszlo to reveal, via an on-the-rug autopsy, that it’s one of the Frog-Gizmos (and a pregnant one, at that). It’s all humming along nicely, with that blend of heart, horror, and humor that this show can easily whip up when it’s in top form.

Harvey Guillén as Guillermo
Photo: Russ Martin/FX

The upshot is that “The Roast” absolutely works—in a vacuum. It’s only when viewed as part of a piece of lightly serialized storytelling that certain elements start to grate, especially the frequent, insistent reminders that Nandor will kill Guillermo, and then himself, when he finds out the truth—which he’s clearly not going to do until the last possible moment of the season. The fact that Laszlo’s depression turns out to have nothing to do with all this season-arc bullshit feels like at least a wink to how silly caring about the long-term plot on this show is. But that doesn’t make the repetition any less of a drag, or make us wish for a show that would stop teasing and just apply its same bold principles to its long-form storytelling as it does to its hilarious, shocking in-the-moment work.

Stray observations

  • While Nadja tries to lure Laszlo back with sex, Nandor appeals to his love of history and mansplaining, asking him to explain the difference between old British warships. (For the record, an Endymion-class frigate was significantly bigger than a brigantine, sporting three masts to the brigantine’s two. Never let it be said that reading parentheticals didn’t teach you anything.)
  • “Look what I found! A big box of ships and pornography!”
  • “We’ve known each other for so many years. We can practically finish each other’s handjobs.”
  • Even Afanas, in full anti-human diatribe, is a fan of Sean.
  • A sad, funny beat: when Nandor points out the bit of vampire myth that says they’ll die if Guillermo kills Afanas, since they’re descend from him, with Nadja replying, “Maybe it wouldn’t be such a bad thing if we ended up dying?” She’s been going through a lot lately.
  • “It’s like he doesn’t even want this to be resolved…by my killing him…”
  • “And a flat Pepsi for Guillermo.”
  • We do get one good Laszlo “If you’ll excuse meyyyy,” at least.
  • Laszlo, autopsying Frog-Guillermo: “Does he have an amphibious eggsac?”
    Nadja: “Maybe?”
    Nandor: “He never said… I never asked.”
    Colin: “He wore a lot of layers.”
  • “At this point, we are more like roommates than roommates who viciously murder humans together.”
  • “To be a vampire is my dream. But to be your familiar will be my honor. Thank you for this opportunity.” Aww…
  • The visual of the Baron flushing one of the frogs down the toilet with a sad “so it goes” expression is a delight.
  • Obviously, the actual answer is to order alphabetically by subject, but who are we to say?

Source link

What We Do In The Shadows can

SAG-AFTRA issued a statement on Thursday evening to encourage members to promote and audition for approved interim agreement productions, as a means of “strengthening the union’s bargaining position and demonstrating solidarity.”

The guild’s statement provides guidance in regards to the matter of promoting a project with an interim agreement, which has been a matter of contention among some SAG-AFTRA members since the strike began in July. Stars such as Sarah Silverman and Viola Davis have publicly questioned whether SAG-AFTRA members working under those circumstances would be appropriate.

For projects to obtain an interim agreement from the guild, a producer must operate independently from companies belonging to the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers and agree to terms proposed by SAG-AFTRA in its negotiations with the AMPTP.

“This is what solidarity looks like. We are proud of our members who demonstrate the various ways to bolster the strike effort,” SAG-AFTRA national executive director and chief negotiator Duncan Crabtree-Ireland said in a statement. “Whether it’s walking a picket line, working on approved Interim Agreement productions, or maintaining employment on one of our other permissible, non-struck contracts, our members’ support for their union is empowering and inspiring.”

Crabtree-Ireland continued, “The Interim Agreement is a vital part of our strategic approach and was created for several reasons, all of which are aimed at protecting the interests of our members. The Agreement demonstrates to the AMPTP and the struck companies that independent producers at all budget levels are eager, keen, and able to work with our members under these terms. We encourage SAG-AFTRA members to audition for and appear in projects that have been approved for an Interim Agreement, and applaud them for promoting their work in these productions.” 

The release comes as the film industry prepares for the fall festival season, with events in Venice, Telluride and Toronto kicking off over the next few weeks. Film festivals represent major launching pads for projects seeking distribution or looking to make a splash in the awards race. The matter of SAG-AFTRA members being allowed to promote in Toronto, Telluride and Venice has been a major question mark since the strike began — the guild’s new statement represents a push that would lead to some level of talent being on the ground at festivals, provided that their productions have obtained interim agreements.

Source link

SAG-AFTRA issued a statement on Thursday evening

Disney is once again raising the ad-free prices of both Disney Plus and Hulu this fall. Beginning on October 12th, Disney Plus will cost $13.99 per month, while Hulu’s no-ads tier will run $17.99. The ad-sponsored tiers of both services will (for now) each remain $7.99.

Perhaps to ease that blow, the company is introducing a new combo subscription that will bundle ad-free experiences for both Disney Plus and Hulu for $19.99 per month. That plan will be available on September 6th.

But these subscription hikes to the standalone services are substantial; Disney last raised the cost of Disney Plus to $10.99 / month a year ago. At that time, ad-free Hulu jumped up to $14.99. It now costs more than the ad-free tier of Warner Bros. Discovery’s Max service, which is $15.99 monthly.

The triple play of Disney Plus (no ads), Hulu (no ads), and ESPN Plus (with ads) will also be increasing to $24.99. Hulu with Live TV with ads is rising to $76.99, with the commercial-free version jumping to $89.99 per month from the current $82.99.

In the US alone, Disney’s streaming portfolio now has grown to include so many options and tiers that the company needs a table to clearly differentiate all that’s available. Here’s the one it included in a press email today, now listing the upcoming “Duo Premium” plan alongside the rest that’s currently on offer.

The “Duo Basic” costs $10 less, but that means putting up with ads when using either service. Neither allows customers to pay up front for an annual plan, indicating that even these prices could be subject to change in the coming months.

Disney also today revealed that it’s going to get stricter about password sharing between its services and announced that the with-ads tier of Disney Plus will be rolling out “in select markets across Europe and in Canada beginning November 1st” after a successful launch in the US.

Source link

Disney is once again raising the ad-free

Police have confirmed the arrest of multiplatinum recording artist Polo G and his brother, Trench Baby, in a Wedneday raid on the former’s Chatsworth, Calif. mansion.

Polo G (real name: Taurus Bartlett) was arrested after police found an illegal short-barrel rifle after searching his $4.9 million mansion and car. His younger brother, Trench Baby, (real name: Taurean Bartlett) was wanted in a robbery and taken into police custody.

Trench Baby was released late Wednesday after posting $100,000 bail. Polo G was released on his own recognizance, according to Los Angeles County jail records.

Trench Baby has a Sept. 13 court date. Polo G is scheduled to appear on Sept. 12.

Polo G is represented by attorney Bradford Cohen, who has represented rappers Draze, Lil Wayne and Kodak Black. It is unclear who represents Trench Baby.

Taurus Bartlett, performing as Polo G, is a Columbia Records artist. His 2019 debut, “Die a Legend,” went double-platinum. The following year, his second album, “Goat,” had 10 songs chart in Billboard’s Hot 100.

In 2021, his third album, “Hall of Fame,” debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200. The album’s single, “Rapstar,” spent two weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100, besting superstars Bruno Mars, Justin Bieber, the Weeknd and Ariana Grande.

All three of his albums have sold more than 2 million units. Polo G’s fourth album, “H.O.O.D P.O.E.T,” has just been released.

Trench Baby has appeared on several songs with his brother.

Source link

Police have confirmed the arrest of multiplatinum

With already over half of the year gone, there’s a variety of music that is still set to be released for the remainder of 2023 from many top artists. There seems to constantly be announcements of new releases of singles, albums, and various editions of previously released material and in the music industry, there’s never a dull moment as new content from performers in genres of all kinds, “from pop and hip-hop to alternative, K-pop, [and] country” is being put on deck for listeners and loyal fans to enjoy. If you want to know more about who’s releasing what next, read on below to find out!

Miley Cyrus and Selena Gomez tease new music

In the coming weeks, there will be major releases coming from a variety of music artists, including former Disney Channel stars turned award-winning musicians. Miley Cyrus has announced her new single, “Used to Be Young,” will be released on August 25, the latest from her Endless Summer Vacation album, which spawned the top single, Flowers. Cyrus shared on Instagram that she will release her new single with a new version of her Endless Summer Vacation (backyard sessions) TV special. She stated that, “This time with a retrospective interview sharing stories about the first 30 years of my life in honor of [“Used To Be Young”}. This song is dedicated to my loyal fans. I love YOU for loving every version of ME.”

In addition, Selena Gomez, another Disney alum turned pop star, has announced that her new song, “Single Soon”, will come out on August 25 as well. She shared on Instagram that, “Y’all have been asking for new music for a while…Since I’m not quite done with SG3, I wanted to put out a fun little song I wrote a while back that’s perfect for the end of summer.” September marks the launch of the latest album of fellow Disney alum turned musician Demi Lovato. With the recent releases of rock versions of Lovato’s previous songs such as “Heart Attack”, “Confident”, and  and “Sorry Not Sorry”, the album, titled REVAMPED,  is scheduled to come out on September 15 and will feature these singles along with other songs. Lovato shared, “Breathing new life into the songs that played such a huge role in my career has allowed me to feel so much closer to my music than ever before. I can’t wait for you to hear REVAMPED.”

Corrine Bailey Rae and Olivia Rodrigo share new album announcements

September 15 will mark the release of the latest album from Corinne Bailey Rae, the Grammy-winning singer/songwriter, titled Black Rainbows. Inspired by artworks at Chicago’s Stony Island Arts Bank, Rae shared that, “I knew when I walked through those doors that my life had changed forever…Engaging with these archives and encountering Theaster Gates and his practice has changed how I think about myself as an artist and what the possibilities of my work can be. This music has come through seeing. Seeing has been like hearing, for me. While I was looking, songs/sounds appeared.”

Before Black Rainbows and REVAMPED are released, a Disney alum from Generation Z makes her return with the release of her sophomore album. Olivia Rodrigo returns with Guts, slated to release on September 8. With the track list confirmed, and singles being released such as “bad idea, right?”, Rodrigo shared on social media when announcing Guts that, “I am so proud of this record and I can’t wait to share it with you all!” As shared by Teen Vogue, Rodrigo said of Guts that, “For me, this album is about growing pains and trying to figure out who I am at this point in my life…I feel like I grew 10 years between the ages of 18 and 20 — it was such an intense period of awkwardness and change. I think that’s all just a natural part of growth, and hopefully, the album reflects that.” Also releasing on September 8 is the debut studio album from V of the band, BTS, called Layo(v)er. According to Forbes, hints about the sound of the album have become apparent from Big Hit Music, the music label that V belongs to. The project seems to be, “largely based around an R&B sound, though there are also indications that the collection will interweave elements of pop, which V and BTS are perhaps best known for.”

Kylie Minouge re-emerges with new album ‘Tension’

Kylie Minogue has been in the music industry for years, and she will release her sixteenth studio album on September 22 titled Tension, her first new body of work since the album Disco in 2020. With her new album, Minogue is going into a direction that will allow her to, “celebrate each song’s individuality and to dive into that freedom.” One of the biggest announcements for all of 2023 is that Taylor Swift’s next re-recorded album will be released on October 27. 1989 (Taylor’s Version) was announced at the last Los Angeles show of her Eras concert tour and will feature new tracks that have been designated to have been from the vault.

Taylor Swift announces re-recorded ‘1989’ album

On Instagram, Swift shared that, “The 1989 album changed my life in countless ways, and it fills me with such excitement to announce that my version of it will be out October 27th. To be perfectly honest, this is my most FAVORITE re-record I’ve ever done because the 5 From The Vault tracks are so insane. I can’t believe they were ever left behind.”

Country music stars Chris Stapleton and Dolly Parton release new albums

On November 10, Chris Stapleton is back with his fifth studio album, Higher. With the release of the single “White Horse”, described by Uproxx as “emotionally raw and brutally honest,” a press release related to the new album from the singer stated that the new album will, “span genres and defy easy categorization.” The legendary Dolly Parton is back with Rockstar, which will come out on November 17. After initially denying acceptance into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, citing she is more a country artist than a rock artist, Parton subsequently accepted the nomination into the prestigious Hall and intended to make an album of rock covers and collaborate with other artists to help justify her inclusion.

The album features a who’s who of collaborations with fellow Rock and Roll Hall of Famers, legends, and Grammy winners, including Sting, Ann Wilson, Stevie Nicks, Debbie Harry, Elton John, Linda Perry, Pat Benatar, and Paul McCartney with Ringo Starr, Peter Frampton, and Mick Fleetwood. She will also perform covers by herself, such as a cover of Prince’s “Purple Rain” and make it a family matter by performing “Wrecking Ball”, a cover of her goddaughter Miley Cyrus’ hit 2013 single.

2023 is definitely shaping to be an excellent year for new music.

Are you excited about any of the upcoming releases? Keep up to date with Culturess for more music news and coverage.

Source link

With already over half of the

Photo by Paul Espinosa.

Cesar Chavez was a labor leader and civil rights activist who cofounded the National Farm Workers Association (NFWA), which later became the United Farm Workers (UFW) labor union, with Dolores Huerta. The Chavez family became migrant workers after his parents lost their farm during the Great Depression, and lived in a succession of migrant camps. Bearing firsthand witness to the poor treatment of migrant workers inspired Chavez’s inception of the farmworkers union.

Music and the arts were instrumental to the success of the social movement Chavez helped found. In the 1960’s and 70’s, Chavez and farmworker activists formed an alliance with musicians and artists to help build a movement called “La Causa.” The enthusiastic response of musicians and performers in fundraisers for the Farmworkers Union, the emergence of Chicano Art from the fields of Delano, California, the role of theater in the struggle, nonviolent action and the response to violence with art all helped form the legacy of a movement that joined social struggle and culture at the hip.

This timeline explores Cesar Chavez’s life, the major milestones in his career and the advancement of the labor workers movement.

1927

Cesario Estrada Chavez is born on March 31, 1927 in Yuma, Arizona.

1927

1939

The Chavez family loses their farm and business and become migrant farm workers.

1939

1942

Chavez’s father becomes disabled. Cesar quits school to work in the fields.

1942

1944-1946

Chavez serves in the U.S. Navy.

1944-1946

1948

The Chavez family joins the National Farm Labor Union.

1948

1948

Chavez marries Helen Fabela.

1948

1958

The Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee is founded by Father Donald McDonald, Father Thomas McCullough and Dolores Huerta, a native New Mexican.

1958

1962

Chavez starts The National Farm Workers Association. The NFWA has 1,000 dues-paying members across 50 local chapters.

1962

1965

Chavez leads major strikes in McFarland and Porterville, California.

1965

1966

Robert Kennedy conducts Senate hearings on agricultural labor in Delano, California.

1966

1966

A mass march from Delano to Sacramento is conducted, and the first farm labor agreement is signed. The union is renamed United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO.

1966

1967

An international grape boycott is called to force growers to negotiate.

1967

1969

The Bakersfield, California pesticide hearings begin. A march to the Mexican border protesting grower use of undocumented workers as strike breakers takes place.

1969

1970

The first table grape contract is signed with the Freedman Corporation. Chavez is jailed for defying a court injunction against boycotting grapes. Mass pressure forces his release.

1970

1975

The California Labor Relations Act is enacted. The short-handled hoe tool is outlawed.

1975

1984

Chavez announces a new grape boycott against pesticide use.

1984

1986

The Immigration Reform and Control Act is enacted.

1986

1990

On November 12, 1990, the president of Mexico, Carlos Salinas de Gortari, awards Cesar Chavez the highest Mexican civilian award, the El Aguila Azteca.

1990

1991

Chavez speaks at the University of New Mexico’s Woodward Hall. He boycotts judgments held against the United Farm Workers (UFW) and holds a nationwide
campaign fundraiser.

1991

1993

At Plumbers Hall in Albuquerque in March 1993, Chavez speaks out against pesticide poisoning of farmworkers.

1993

1993

On April 23, 1993, after fasting 36 days to protest pesticide use, Cesar Chavez dies in his sleep. Fifty thousand people attend his funeral.

1993

1994

Chavez is posthumously awarded the highest honor to a civilian, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

1994

1994

After a 340-mile march from Delano to Sacramento by 17,000 workers, California establishes a Cesar Chavez State Holiday for March 31. The holiday is signed into effect by Governor Pete Wilson on September 2, 1994.

1994

Source link

Photo by Paul Espinosa. Cesar Chavez was a

As wildfires continue to rage in British Columbia’s interior, one B.C. activist is questioning whether a common forestry practice is contributing to the wildfire threat.

Every year in British Columbia, tens of thousands of hectares of clear-cut land is sprayed with Glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide known as Roundup.

The spraying, coupled with manual brush clearing on cut blocks, is done to prevent the growth of deciduous, or broadleaf, trees so that they don’t out-compete more valuable conifers, timber trees such as pine.


Click to play video: 'Kelowna evacuees return home after orders rescinded'


Kelowna evacuees return home after orders rescinded


Under B.C.’s Forest Planning and Practices Regulation, non-conifer trees must be kept to less than five per cent of re-planted cut block.

Story continues below advertisement

“These are considered weeds that get in the way of the money trees, which are pine primarily, spruce and Douglas fir to a lesser extent in the interior,” said James Steidle, founder of Stop the Spray B.C.

“The end goal of all of these strategies is to grow a high density pine plantation that in the interior of B.C. is the most flammable forest type we could probably grow.”

Steidle believes climate change, not forestry practices, is the driving force behind the explosive growth of today’s wildfires.

But he said intentionally killing off more fire-resistant broadleaf trees eliminates natural firebreaks and allows wildfires to get bigger, hotter and faster.


Click to play video: 'B.C. wildfires: Tensions rise in Shuswap at wildfire blockade'


B.C. wildfires: Tensions rise in Shuswap at wildfire blockade


“It’s not the fundamental threat we are facing, but its definitely not helping us get out of the problem. The way I look at it, letting every single stick of fire-resistant deciduous grow is a solution,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

“Lets get these trees growing that are very hard to light on fire, lets stop prioritizing the trees that are the easiest tree to light on fire.”

According to a government-commissioned review of Glyphosate use, about 11,000 hectares of Crown land were sprayed in 2018, down from a high of more than 40,000 hectares in 1989.

It also found that the proportion of harvested forest areas that were subject to vegetation control of all types dropped from from about 18 per cent to 14 per cent between 2008 and 2018.

UBC professor of forest ecology Lori Daniels said that while broadleaf trees have historically been viewed as competitors with a negative effect on the growth of economically-valuable conifers, the science and the thinking around them is evolving.

Letting broadleaf trees grow amid conifers in mixed forest may create create resilience to drought, insects, disease and wildfire.

It may improve the economics of the forestry industry as well, she said.


Click to play video: 'B.C. wildfires: Agency working tirelessly to help evacuees'


B.C. wildfires: Agency working tirelessly to help evacuees


“Letting those aspens come back on the landscape will enhance wildlife habitat, it actually contributes to nutrient dynamics in the soil, it creates shade and protection for those conifers,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

“As we see warmer and drier and more extreme droughts in the summertime, a lot of the seedlings we are planting in regenerating forests are not surviving those hot dry conditions — having broadleaf trees generate some shade and replenish the soil with nutrients can actually benefit those conifer seedlings and improve the regeneration of those forests.”

B.C.’s Ministry of Forest did not directly respond to questions about whether it had research into links between Glyphosate spraying and wildfires.

In a statement, it said that herbicide use in the forestry sector has “declined by 90 per cent across the province” since the 1990s as the industry uses a variety of other methods including manual, mechanical, biological and prescribed burning treatments to manage “competing vegetation.”

It added that Health Canada, regulates herbicides in Canada, has determined Glyphosate is safe and not flammable when used according to safety standards.

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Source link

As wildfires continue to rage in British

SPOILER ALERT: This interview contains spoilers from “The Last Supper Part Two: Entrée,” the Season 2 finale of “And Just Like That,” now streaming on Max.

“And just like that … I ordered two more Cosmopolitans” — that’s Carrie Bradshaw’s last line, delivered in her signature voiceover, in the Season 2 finale of “And Just Like That.”

Carrie (Sarah Jessica Parker) delivers that proclamation as she relaxes on a beautiful beach, alongside her friend Seema (Sarita Choudhury). “We ran at love,” Seema says earlier in the scene. “And where did that get us?” Carrie answers simply, “Greece.”

Both women have fallen in love during the second season of the “Sex and the City” revival, and for now, are seemingly at peace with the challenges ahead of them. Carrie has accepted that Aidan (John Corbett) — her old love, now renewed — needs to be home in Virginia for his kids for the next five years (or possibly less, if she gets “time off for good behavior,” as she puts it). And the once-determinedly single Seema has fallen for Ravi (Armin Amiri), a high-flying Marvel director, who’s also asked her to wait as well — albeit for only five months.

Max

The return of Kim Cattrall’s Samantha in a cameo — one fans have anticipated since before the Season 2 premiere, when Variety broke the news — is seen early in the episode. Samantha calls Carrie with her regrets that she was unable attend Carrie’s dinner party as she said one final goodbye to her Upper East Side apartment, where Carrie lived during “Sex and the City,” and returned to after the death of Big (Chris Noth) in the series premiere of “And Just Like That.” Samantha, who was going to surprise her, asks Carrie to put her on speaker. “Thank you for everything, you fucking fabulous, fabulous flat!” Samantha says, then slipping in a reference to Annabelle Bronstein, an alter ego Samantha affected in a Season 6 episode of “Sex and the City” in order to attempt to get into Soho House.

“And Just Like That” showrunner Michael Patrick King says he’s been watching all the dialogue and debate around the second season of the show — and has found it “thrilling.”

“Like back in the old days, where people talked about something, and didn’t just eat it quickly, and get over it,” King says of the show’s weekly rollout on Max.

As it did during its first season, “And Just Like That” certainly has continued to stir fan conversation, which King delves into during our interview. The title of the episode refers to Carrie’s goodbye apartment dinner party — as prepared by a Michelin star chef — in which all the “And Just Like That” characters, new and old, congregate as a group for the first time. “It was fun for us — really fun — to end the season with an actual sitdown of those characters together,” King says. He embraces, and is clearly amused by, what he calls some viewers’ “hilariously aggressive love-hate relationship” with the show.

With the continuation of the writers strike, King doesn’t know when he and his team will begin working on Season 3, but the news of the show’s renewal went out earlier this week. He says that with Carrie in a sort of limbo with Aidan, he didn’t want to leave fans wondering — “I don’t want people thinking they have to wrestle with that as the eternal ending,” King says.

In a wide-ranging Zoom conversation the morning the finale dropped on Max, King discusses bringing Samantha back, constructing the new arc of Carrie and Aidan’s relationship, why Lisa Todd Wexley (Nicole Ari Parker) and her husband Herbert (Christopher Jackson) never used the word “abortion,” and the perpetual discourse machine that is Che Diaz (Sara Ramírez).

Did you know when you decided to bring Aidan back how that story would end, with him asking Carrie to wait until his kids grow up?

I knew the word “Aidan” to start, and then because one of my rules is to never repeat, I knew that she couldn’t hurt him again — for the audience and for Carrie’s own thought process, she couldn’t. The question then was, how do you tell their story differently? Carrie, this time, was running at love, as she tells Seema — run at love, if you feel it. The new Carrie-Aidan thing was that she had no reservations, and so we knew that we needed something to break them up.

And since we think he is true of heart, and that she’s true of heart, the only thing when we looked around — and with my friends, and with the other writers with children — the really great love and the great sacrifice are parents with their kids. So we knew that the kids would be a problem. And then it wound up being the youngest one who became — we call him a puzzle, but he’s a very complicated plot piece as well.

Craig Blankenhorn

What does Carrie’s five-years-in-the-future life with Aidan give “And Just Like That,” narratively, going forward? 

It gives us more story. It gives us an open end. It gives us a complicated problem. It gives us space. It gives Carrie a big thing to think about, you know what I mean?

What it gives us is a problem that we have to figure out: how Carrie Bradshaw finds her way through this to love.

We’re in the middle of two different strikes. But when you wrapped the season, were you thinking that we will see Aidan again, at least occasionally?

Well, they made a promise to each other. And he said, “Nothing bad is going to happen.” That wasn’t a goodbye. That was a see ya sometime. They were still very much connected at the end. The way they played it was it wasn’t tragic. And they were still very much alive, and they had that whole night where they laughed and cried and made love, or did whatever they did. But it ended kind of in a grown-up understanding of here’s where we are. 

What Sarah Jessica liked about the writing was that no one tried to convince the other one that they were wrong or right. They were just accepting the reality of that moment, and letting it be. She said the word “grown up” to me — it felt grown up. That doesn’t mean it’s not complicated.

When did you come up with Carrie and Seema on the beach together in Greece — drinking Cosmos, of all things — as the final scene in the season?  

I actually said to the writers right away, “Whatever happens, it ends with Carrie and Seema on the beach, looking out at the horizon” — whatever that means.

What it meant to me was: It goes on, and it’s a tribute to women without men. It’s a tribute to glamour. It’s a tribute to pluckishness. A lot of these last voiceovers, from the very first one, “And just like that … Big died” — I mean, you can’t get more heavy and dark and poetic than that. When I was writing the last voiceover, it’s the most casual one: “And just like that … I ordered two more Cosmopolitans.”

I mean, that is it, right? Something happens, and you grab a friend, and you go on. And it’s that spirit that keeps going.

No Bethenny Frankel in sight!

That we know of!

Max

OK, let’s talk Samantha. How did you figure out what you wanted the Samantha scene to be once she agreed to be on the show? 

As you know, it’s literally a cameo. I mean, it’s just a little moment. What I always thought was that these characters are texting, and occasionally talking, so I knew it was going to be conversational. The heroic thing was that Samantha was coming for an overnight — like, I’m flying to New York for the night, because I wanted to be there to celebrate the apartment. I felt it was a very nice, grand gesture for Samantha. I believe she would do that for that moment. The weather screwed it up.

But I wanted to do a reference to “Sex and the City” by having her reference Annabelle Bronstein again from the Soho House, because that was pure Samantha DNA: “I’m Annabelle Bronstein!” It was a classic Samantha, bad girl, fabulous girl story. And it shows that Samantha’s still thinking about it.

I’m happy that it’s really early in the episode, because I don’t want the drumbeat that this big dramatic thing is going to happen. Because that was never the intention. The intention was: Look, there she is! They’re talking. It’s two steps past an emotional text. They’re talking.

What were the logistics of filming the Samantha phone call?

It’s the state of the art studio in New York. It was: Kim came, she did her scene and she left. I was filming another scene in the city on 23rd Street, Anthony and Giuseppe. Sarah Jessica did her scene earlier, much like all the other phone calls on the show, quite frankly, they don’t happen with the other actors. So it felt very normal, and yet very heightened, to see Samantha again.

Wait, so you didn’t direct that scene? 

No.

What kinds of conversations did you and Sarah Jessica have about her side of the conversation? I mean, obviously, in the past, she’s been very frank about how she felt about the possibility of Kim coming back.

Look, Kate, I’m not going to say anything past the fact that it happened. So something shifted everywhere. Obviously, it happened. It was the 25th anniversary of “Sex and the City.” Everybody knew it would be good for the show, and hopefully fun for the fans. And everybody just did it. And there wasn’t a lot of drama around the conversation: People just did it.

I loved the “Sex and the City” music underneath the conversation, and it was so sweet that she kissed the phone. 

Very Samantha. Very, very Samantha, and surprising and beautiful. And I did put the “Sex and the City” oeuvre under the thing, because it was clearly a moment from that. It was fizz. It wasn’t the actual, exact sound, but it was the essence of it. I liked the fact that she kissed the phone too. 

What was it like to include her in the finale, having built this whole world without her? I worry for you that this will just raise the question of her coming back more.

As far as “Sex and the City” and “And Just Like That,” I never think past the moment that I’m finished. I mean, this is unbelievable that it’s still happening. I didn’t end “Sex and the City” and then think, “Oh, we’re for sure doing a movie,” and then I didn’t end the second movie thinking “We’re coming back as a whole new series.”

Fans seem to be having their own expectations in such a micro way that I can’t even get into the conversation. I really thought it was a little treat, and I would never build any expectations on more.

Max

What were some other crucial questions that you wanted to answer in the finale?

The thing I like most about the finale is Carrie standing at that table, and the people at the table represent to me how current and alive Carrie Bradshaw is in the modern-day world.

I love that the friendships that were deep for 26 years, are deeper. I love that everybody landed in a new place. Charlotte and Miranda both have arrived at new places: I think it’s interesting that they’re both back at work, which is where they started. I love that we’re able to deepen these other characters that never existed in this universe. I think they’re all dimensionally phenomenal performers. I’m really happy that we got to show these people, and grow them a little. And I’m really happy the audience sort of came with us.

What do you mean “sort of”?

You know how Steve talks about the roller coaster? They come and they go, and they love and they doubt and they hate and they love — and then they begrudgingly say, “Is this good?”

I mean, it’s the most hilariously aggressive love-hate relationship, as a cosmos. Even on the scary parts of the roller coaster, they’re like, “Oh, now we like it! Now we hate it again. Now we like it!”

It means it’s alive and kicking. It’s not dead, and it’s certainly not a reboot: It’s a new chapter with new energy — things that you love or don’t love. And it really is interesting to do something that people own. They own it.

Did you know when you started writing the season that Carrie was finally going to sell her apartment? And what did that mean for the show, and for Carrie? 

No, I did not. But I’ll tell you, when I saw Gramercy, I went, “Oh, Season 3.” The first thought I had was, “Who lives under her?” When I saw the set, I never wanted to leave it. None of us did. Sarah Jessica was like, “This is amazing.” 

As we went through the writing room, we were like, “It’s time for her to go.” And we did trap ourselves: Aidan won’t go in there. That was the other thing I knew right up front. Aidan would never go in there, until the last moment where she goes, “Wait, you’re in the apartment. Uh oh!”

Why did you have Carrie question whether Big was the right choice for her? Her saying that pretty much rocked the foundation of the franchise to its core!

I mean: Carrie asks questions. From Day 1, the entire “Sex and the City” was built on her saying, “I couldn’t help but wonder, were we the new men?”

So why would asking the scariest question to her very best, trusted confidant be so wrong — as much as it is dramatic and thrilling? Look, things happen when people die. And the fact that she was now having quote, unquote “better orgasms than ever,” even with Aidan, made her ask why — why would that be? And then you realize she was holding back, and then the writer in her says, “Was Big a big mistake?” The writer in us says, “Was Big a big mistake?” Because we know it’s a fault-line quake.

But I killed Big in the first episode. So it’s not un-foreshadowed. It’s just sometimes to go forward — you have to take hard looks at stuff. And we tried to have her backtrack a little to Victor Garber’s character, when she says it was a wonderful relationship that ended too soon, because we thought maybe we should have done more on that.

One of the things we do is to ask the thing that may be normal TV franchise models wouldn’t: bring in new characters, kill others, ask questions about the whole beginning of the thing. Doubt. Maybe that’s why people are feeling like they’re on a roller coaster. 

Max

Speaking of conversation around the show, I saw a lot of people talking about Lisa Todd Wexley’s pregnancy, and the fact that neither she nor Herbert ever uses the word “abortion.” They speak very euphemistically about it.

We always thought Herbert would be more euphemistic about it, or even afraid to even say the word himself. Because it’s such a big word for that couple — maybe their upbringing, or his upbringing. What was important to us in the room is the sentence that she did speak: I’m thankful I live in a place where I have that option. That was the only important thing that the women in the writing room wanted to have her say — that was the acknowledgement. 

People way back asked me why I just didn’t call this “Sex and the City.” And I said, “Because I won’t have to. You will.” And I didn’t have to say the word, because you all heard it.

Miranda said it, and that was years and years and years and years ago, when it wasn’t maybe so necessary to say the word. But if it had been Miranda and Carrie, Miranda would have said it. If it had been Nya, Nya would have said it. But it was Herbert and Lisa, and we felt that they would speak this way about it. We’re not afraid. I mean, on “Sex and the City,” we talked about the number of abortions Samantha had — the abortion Carrie had.

You all heard it. You’re asking me the question. You said the word “abortion.” We didn’t have to. As long as you understood what it was.

Craig Blankenhorn

What’s your assessment of how viewers absorbed Che this season — the failure of their pilot, their breakup with Miranda — after what happened last season, which you and I have discussed a ton? 

People come with a predisposed idea of who that character is, and then they wait to have that fulfilled. And what I wanted to do was show what happened if we go back to the origins of the character, which is Carrie and Che being friends. And what I liked about it is Che became Carrie’s friend again, and I started to hear, “I love Che and Carrie!”

Every time people say they don’t like Che, I go, “You mean you don’t like standups!” I mean, you’re standing on stage asking people to think you’re art. It’s a lot, that character. The audience got to see other sides, which is all you’re supposed to be doing if you get more than one season.

I thought they responded to it the way it was written. And then hopefully, at the end, they’re like, “Good they’re not together, and they never will be.” 

What kinds of conversations did you have with Sara Ramírez about Che this season? 

With characters and actors, I start telling them broad strokes of the arc — the emotional journey, not the details. With Sarah Jessica, I said “Aidan.” With Kristin, I said “back to work.” With Miranda, I said “spokesperson for the Human Rights Watch.”

With Che, I said, “deconstruct emotionally.” And the first thing Sara said to me when I called them, they said, “We’ve got to bring Che down. Che’s got to go in.” And because Sara is amazing actor, I knew that I could go in. So that was the conversation, and then as we go down the road, we have some talks based on language and thought. But they’re amazingly open, amazingly skilled.

The biggest back and forth we had this season was about the last standup, and what it would be. Is it too hard? Is it too soft? What does Che want out of that night? So that kind of stuff. But it was never about anything needing to be fixed, as much as where else are we going? 

Here’s a question about that scene. A lot of fans, including me, found it shitty of Carrie that she and Aidan didn’t leave with Miranda after Che said that stuff in the standup scene — and didn’t disinvite Che from the dinner party! What do you say to that?

I don’t know if you’ve ever been in a comedy room when your friend bombs, but it takes a minute to figure out how you’re going to process this. I think from Sarah Jessica’s performance, she told us she didn’t appreciate it. 

I have no idea what happened next, but I don’t think they hung around. I’m pretty sure Aidan said, we’re gone, and they paid that thing, and they went out that back door. And I’m sure there was a call from Che to Carrie saying, “I fucked up. What should I do?” To anyone who’s upset about that, I say Aidan threw down some hard cash, they took the sips of their drinks, and went out that back door!

The thing that took me by surprise was the fans’ reaction to Carrie telling Miranda the next day she had to come to the party. She says you’re alive, you’re coming, I care about you — you’re alive. I mean, when you’ve had somebody that you love die tragically, I think everything else seems a little less of a Richter-scale moment. Like, they’ll figure it out.

Craig Blankenhorn

How did becoming a monk become the way for the show to say goodbye to Stanford? You had to write him out after Willie Garson died during the first season.

Listen, there’s nothing I would have liked more than: “Ding dong!” and Stanford’s back in a kimono with some Louis Vuitton trunks, going, “Japan’s fabulous!”

But I don’t have that option. Willie died. I didn’t really feel good about the triage we did in the first season that he was in Japan. I had to skate across ice to do that, thin ice, because we were in shock, and I had to just write him out of the show. I wanted to put Willie someplace golden. I wanted to put Willie in heaven. That’s just me, personally: I wanted to put give him a beautiful resting place. 

And then the writer in me was like, we have to tie this story up. So what can be final, and almost silly, and almost real? Sarah Jessica and I went to Kyoto after “Sex and the City 2,” which was — spoiler alert — not received well. She was fine, and I was wrecked, and feeling responsible. We walked around to a lot of temples in Kyoto. There were no prayers, it was just this beautiful space. We sat there, and I felt stuff — I felt sort of released. I felt perspective. And I felt beauty and “God” in quotes.

And I thought, “Well, Sarah Jessica and I sat there. Sarah Jessica and I love Willie.” I just thought it was a final resting place for a character that isn’t death, but is also God’s concierge. And they could make slight fun of it. I didn’t want him to endlessly be just traveling around, “Auntie Mame”-style, sending postcards. 

Would Willie Garson have liked that?

Would he have liked being in Japan? No, he would have liked to be on the show! He wanted to be on every episode.

Sorry, I mean, would he have thought that was funny? 

I have no idea. But I have to say almost my favorite thing in Season 2 is the way Sarah Jessica drank that Cosmo in one gulp after the toast. I wasn’t expecting it, she was just in the moment. And she just drank the entire cosmo, and in the middle, she winked at Anthony, or Mario, and just kept going after she said, “To Stanny.” I think that he would have loved that moment.

The show has been renewed for Season 3. Will the writers’ room start as soon as the strike’s over? 

Oh, yeah. As soon as the strike’s over, the room will start immediately. I don’t know the structure or the timeframe or anything yet, but I do know that there’s an open situation that we’re going to have to address: Carrie Bradshaw.

This interview has been edited and condensed.

Source link

SPOILER ALERT: This interview contains spoilers from “The

SAG-AFTRA is ramping up its call to members who are working on projects approved for the guild’s interim agreement to promote them at the upcoming fall film festivals in Venice, Telluride and Toronto.

“This is what solidarity looks like. We are proud of our members who demonstrate the various ways to bolster the strike effort. Whether it’s walking a picket line, working on approved Interim Agreement productions, or maintaining employment on one of our other permissible, non-struck contracts, our members’ support for their union is empowering and inspiring,” the guild’s national executive director Duncan Crabtree-Ireland wrote in a statement.

SAG-AFTRA has ramped up its efforts to communicate the strategy and process behind its interim agreement to its members and the media after some within the actors guild voiced skepticism about its effectiveness and confusion with how it was being implemented.

This has included multiple press conferences and Q&A sessions among members to explain the criteria behind approving specific productions that are not produced by studios represented by the AMPTP. To qualify for the interim agreement, independent productions must adhere to all of the terms in the most recent contract proposal submitted by the guild to the AMPTP prior to the start of SAG-AFTRA’s strike last month.

Some projects that have been approved have already completed filming and are set to premiere at upcoming film festivals without a major studio attached, such as Michael Mann’s biopic “Ferrari” starring Adam Driver, which has Neon attached as distributor.

SAG-AFTRA has also urged the media to not refer to the interim agreement as waivers, saying that it is an inaccurate term to describe a “complete, separate and distinct contract that includes all terms and conditions for producers looking to employ our members on their specific independent productions.”

“The Interim Agreement is a vital part of our strategic approach and was created for several reasons, all of which are aimed at protecting the interests of our members. The Agreement demonstrates to the AMPTP and the struck companies that independent producers at all budget levels are eager, keen, and able to work with our members under these terms,” Crabtree-Ireland said.

“We encourage SAG-AFTRA members to audition for and appear in projects that have been approved for an Interim Agreement, and applaud them for promoting their work in these productions,” he added.

Last week, Crabtree-Ireland told reporters that the guild leadership does not believe that projects approved for the interim agreement will be used by AMPTP studios as a way to acquire new films to stream during the guild’s strike, as the agreement requires that distributors also adhere to the terms of SAG-AFTRA’s latest contract proposal.

That proposal includes terms in which distributors share a portion of the film’s streaming revenue based on its viewership, something that is considered a major sticking point with the AMPTP and which the guild believes that streamers like Netflix would not agree to in any acquisition deals for interim agreement projects at film festivals.

Source link

SAG-AFTRA is ramping up its call to

Amazon Freevee’s Emmy-nominated comedy series “Jury Duty” is an incontestable success. At the core of the show is its cast, defined by a pool of actors and one single civilian (aka Ronald) who doesn’t know that he’s being filmed for a reality show. Casting director Susie Farris revealed at Variety‘s Artisans presented by HBO that it took her 12 weeks to assemble the standout cast.

“My casting process took about 12 weeks,” she said. “We saw over 1,000 tapes for all of the jurors.”

David Bernard initially approached Farris about casting what he called an “ensemble comedy” series. “I jumped on a phone call to learn that there was no actual script for me to read and we went from there,” she said. “I didn’t ultimately know what they were going to be playing and what it was going to look like.”

Farris said it was important to her to cast a “cross-section of people” that could represent a real jury in Los Angeles. Casting actors who could create an interesting character “and could come up with interesting dialogue [while being] quick on their feet” was of the utmost importance. 

“We were looking for anybody who had a comedy or improv background who seemed like a real person,” said Farris. “We ended up having one major callback session which was in the form of a focus group.”

From there, two focus groups of 30 actors and “regular people” were established to test their talents. “In each group, the actors were not told who the other actors were, and the regular people had no idea there were actors amongst them,” she revealed. “That’s where we saw people cement their roles on our cast.”

Farris revealed one standout casting was Susan Berger. “There was a moment when the writers thought that they were going to have a character who was a rock and roll woman — that was the audition [Susan] ended up sending in,” she said. “Ultimately they didn’t end up doing that with her character, but when they saw her, everyone kind of knew that she belonged on the jury.”

Watch the full conversation above.

Source link

Amazon Freevee’s Emmy-nominated comedy series “Jury Duty”

SAG-AFTRA is reiterating that it is giving the green light to actors to promote their projects with interim agreements at major fall film festivals.

The union said in a statement on Thursday that it is encouraging members to do publicity for projects that have been granted these pacts, which require these titles to agree to conditions that SAG-AFTRA is seeking in ongoing negotiations with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, at the Telluride Film Festival, Toronto International Film Festival and Venice International Film Festival.

“We are proud of our members who demonstrate the various ways to bolster the strike effort,” national executive director and chief negotiator Duncan Crabtree-Ireland said in a statement. “Whether it’s walking a picket line, working on approved Interim Agreement productions, or maintaining employment on one of our other permissible, non-struck contracts, our members’ support for their union is empowering and inspiring.”

Since the performers’ union began granting them weeks into the strike, interim agreements have been a controversial tactic. The union has maintained that the pacts prove that SAG-AFTRA’s aim in its current negotiations with the AMPTP are reasonable and realizable, and that these agreements keep actors and crew members working and help stem the tide of runaway production to other countries. Critics, meanwhile, have suggested that allowing certain productions to continue with various stars undercuts the impact of the strike, especially if interim agreement projects are eventually bought and distributed by AMPTP member companies.

More to come.

Source link

SAG-AFTRA is reiterating that it is giving

He spent five days on a Colorado ranch in 2022. Although the trip confirmed for him that it wasn’t what he wanted full time, it taught Mr. Calhoun, who is Black, that the western landscapes he loved on TV were something he could go and enjoy. That was a realization far afield from what he had felt watching westerns when he was growing up.

“I watched ‘Young Guns’ a thousand times,” he said. “There wasn’t much of me in it.”

But as much as it is a place on the map, the West is also an idea, one that changes over time. And amid the latest round of fascination with cowboy culture, the western, a staple film genre since the early days of cinema, is being reimagined for a growing audience.

From 2000 to 2009, Hollywood made 23 movies categorized as westerns, according to Comscore, which compiles box office data. That number shot up to 42 from 2010 to 2019. Some of these new films feature Black cowboys, Native American protagonists, queer heroes and damsels far from distress. Some are directed by female filmmakers, like Jane Campion, whose 2021 movie “The Power of the Dog,” which features a most likely closeted rancher, received more Academy Award nominations than any other film last year.

Alaina Roberts, an American historian who wrote “I’ve Been Here All the While: Black Freedom on Native Land,” was raised with all the classic images of what a western film looked like: Davy Crockett wrestling a bear, John Wayne squinting through the Texas dust. Her mother loved those films.

But when Dr. Roberts started her own career as a scholar, those weren’t the visions of the West that captured her imagination. Instead, she wanted to research stories of her own Black family members, who were enslaved by the Chickasaw and Choctaw tribes in what is now Ardmore, Okla. She also grew fascinated by the Buffalo Soldiers, all-Black regiments who policed the plains.

Source link

He spent five days on a Colorado

Bedazzled by the lucrative allures of STEM and the popularity of business degrees, universities have been defunding their humanities programs and transforming themselves into vocational training centers with five-star gyms. Foreign language departments are being eliminated at state universities and history, philosophy and English literature majors are on the chopping block everywhere.

The hue and cry over this benighted movement, in which institutions of higher learning are turning their backs on their fundamental mission, will likely not be enough to stop the forces operating under the cover of budgetary necessity. How can a nation intellectually and morally compete in the 21st century global world with a system of higher education that cares more about magazine rankings than the transmission of wisdom?

The first 2024 Republican presidential primary debate, held Wednesday night in Milwaukee, revealed the moral bankruptcy of an America that no longer values the kind of enlightenment fostered by a liberal arts education. The eight candidates duking it out to play second fiddle to Donald Trump, who skipped the event to pack for his trip to the Fulton County Jail in Atlanta on Thursday and to gloat about his front-runner status, were oblivious to the ironies surrounding them.

Allergic to complexity, they pandered to the partisan lusts of the Republican primary electorate. Incapable of seeing themselves — never mind the world — literally burning around them, these anxious Republican hopefuls adopted ideological positions they couldn’t always muster sufficient belief in, performing roles for an audience they feared but were determined, nonetheless, to master.

Asked to raise a hand if they believed that human behavior was causing climate change, they shriveled up onstage, as though they had been told to remove their clothes before the Fox News viewing public. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis defied moderator Martha MacCallum’s straightforward request on the grounds that they were “not schoolchildren.” He claimed to want to debate the issue but then proceeded to launch into an attack on President Biden’s handling of the deadly wildfire in Maui.

The best defense is offense for a politician who doesn’t want to divulge what he knows about life-or-death matters. As the leader of a state buffeted by hurricanes and endangered by rising seas, the governor knows that insurance companies are fleeing his state as a lost cause. But knowledge has become the true enemy of the people for a would-be demagogue clinging to Trump’s playbook.

Vivek Ramaswamy, the most animatedly pugilistic of the debaters, took the climate question to separate himself from the pack. He wasn’t at all chastened by the boos that erupted when he declared, “As the only person on the stage who isn’t bought and paid for … the climate change agenda is a hoax.” Quite the contrary. He was goaded to more shameless extremes, announcing that “more people are dying of bad climate change policies than they are of actual climate change.”

Perhaps Ramaswamy was equivocating with the audience, secretly recognizing that the failure to recognize the urgency of the crisis is behind the inadequate policies hastening our demise. But equivocation in a country that doesn’t care a whit if Shakespeare is still on the syllabus can easily pass unnoticed. And Ramaswamy, in any case, was careful to shore up his far-right bona fides, lest anyone mistake him for an establishment politician still thinly tethered to reality like former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, neither of whom is living up to polling expectations.

The discussion around Trump’s raft of indictments was carefully contained, but the squirmy spectacle threw into relief what happens when leaders no longer have to worry about their place in history because history itself has been downgraded as a subject. Former Vice President Mike Pence justified the way he defied Trump’s pressure campaign to get him to put the president over the Constitution, but his fear of inciting MAGA fury led him basically to explain that God made him do it.

Former New Jersey Gov. ernor Chris Christie was outspoken on the issue of Trump’s fitness for office. “Someone has to stop normalizing this conduct, OK?” he asserted. But his appeal to reason fell on closed ears. Few in his party wanted anything to do with accountability for a cult hero who has made obstruction of justice a centerpiece of his 2024 platform. (Moderator Bret Baier had to scold the jeering audience for preventing Christie from even making his case.)

Vowing to pardon Trump before he’s even been convicted, Ramaswamy pounced on Christie’s vulnerable right flank. He charged that Christie’s “claim that Donald Trump is motivated by vengeance and grievance would be a lot more credible” if his own campaign “were not based on vengeance and grievance against one man.” How can anything but dogma survive in such a forum? Whether the topic was climate change, abortion, aid to Ukraine or Trump’s determination to destroy American democracy, the point wasn’t to shed light on a complicated public matter but to wield darkness for the sake of political expediency.

Hypocrisy in a primary debate is nothing new, but its flagrancy has reached a calamitous level. How has character come to mean so little in American society? What has gone wrong in our collective education that liars who don’t even make a good faith effort to conceal their deceptions can command such an enduring hold on the populace?

Justice, Greek tragedy reminds us, requires a wide-angle view. The political actors onstage in Milwaukee wore their tragic flaws on their sleeves. The blind spots in their vision made Oedipus look like a seer, but it was a willful, manipulative blindness they were engaged in.

In a New York Review of Books essay on C.P. Taylor’s play “Good,” Jacqueline Rose — who co-directs the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities in London — talks about “the power of fascism to pluck the strings of the unconscious.” I was remembering her phrase while watching Ramaswamy attempt to put the Republican primary audience under his spell.

Christie scored one of his best zingers of the night when he compared Ramaswamy to “a guy who sounds like ChatGPT.” But how will we recognize the dangers of artificial intelligence or the concomitant perils of fascism if we discard the humanities as inconvenient to power?

The first Republican debate of the season took place in a world where literature, history and philosophy have been set aside as irrelevant. Critical thought was banished, and the pursuit of truth was forced to yield to the confirmation of biases and the promulgation of doctrines.

Universities making decisions about what departments to cut should take the long view before they accelerate this degradation of our nation’s capacity to examine, never mind govern, itself.

Source link

Bedazzled by the lucrative allures of

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) is constantly expanding, bringing new heroes and villains into the fold. As a Marvel fan myself, I personally can’t wait for Thunderbolts to arrive.

The upcoming film will see the creation of a new Marvel superhero team but with a twist.

Marvel Thunderbolts

Photo: Marvel

The Thunderbolts are made up of Marvel anti-heroes, many of them former villains. Led by Bucky Barnes, the team includes Yelena Belova, John Walker, Taskmasker, Red Guardian, and Ghost.

While the upcoming film will bring back a group of fan-favorite characters, it will also feature new additions to the MCU.

Joins the MCU

Ayo Edebiri, for example, will be making her MCU debut in Thunderbolts, although the role she is playing is still unknown.

While being careful not to give away too many details, Edebiri discussed her excitement about finally entering the MCU, and what she learned from her co-stars.

Ayo Edebiri

Photo: Variety

“I love being a sponge. I just want to learn as much as possible. I’m excited [for ‘Thunderbolts’] because I don’t know; and to me, that’s cool. I feel like those are always the situations that I’ve benefited from the most. If I don’t know what I’m going to learn, that’s the best possible scenario for me,” Edebiri said.

Edibiri has had a busy year. In addition to her role in the critically acclaimed TV drama, The Bear, the actress voiced April in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem and starred in the new comedy Theater Camp. Now, she will get a chance to flex her muscles in a new genre.

Ayo Edebiri

Photo: Deadline

When Will ‘Thunderbolts’ Hit Theaters.

Thunderbolts is still currently expected to hit theaters on December 20, 2024.

The film’s release date, however, could be affected by the ongoing Hollywood strikes. Production on Thunderbolts shut down in May.

Marvel Thunderbolts Cast

Disney

As always be sure to check back in with MickeyBlog. We will continue to bring you updates on all new news coming out of the MCU.

Thanks for visiting MickeyBlog.com! Want to go to Disney? For a FREE quote on your next Disney vacation, please fill out the form below and one of the agents from MickeyTravels, a Diamond level Authorized Disney Vacation Planner, will be in touch soon!

Source link

The Marvel Cinematic

Summary

  • Filmmaker Chris McKay’s Nightwing movie is officially “dead” according to The Wrap’s film reporter, Umberto Gonzalez.
  • McKay’s project will not be pursued any further, and there is seemingly no place for a Nightwing solo outing in the upcoming DCU.
  • Despite McKay’s Nightwing film being canceled, there is still a chance that the character of Dick Grayson may appear in James Gunn and Peter Safran’s DCU.


The death of Dick Grayson is at hand? No, nothing quite so dramatic. But The Wrap’s film reporter, Umberto Gonzalez, merely claims that filmmaker Chris McKay’s Nightwing movie is officially “dead.” Prior to the announcement of James Gunn and Peter Safran’s Detective Comics Universe (DCU) in January, McKay had designs to lead a film focusing on the Batman’s first sidekick, Robin/Richard Grayson, when he grew up and took on the mantle of Nightwing.

During an online discussion between Gonzalez and Home of DCU on Twitter, The Wrap journalist wrote that McKay’s project wasn’t going to be pursued any further. @homeofdcu wrote:

“I hope Chris McKay still gets to work on his Nightwing movie.”

To which Gonzalez (@elmayimbe) responded:

“That project is dead.”

The first chapter in Gunn and Safran’s DCU is titled Gods and Monsters. And it seems there is no place for a Nightwing solo outing amid such comic book movie drama. During the initial phase, the DCU will kick off in 2025 with its first official feature film, Superman: Legacy. And while the death of his Nightwing film hasn’t been confirmed by McKay, there’s still a very good chance fans could see the character of Dick Grayson (not McKay’s version, though) in the DCU. And possibly even alongside both Batman and Damian Wayne in DCU movie The Brave and the Bold.

Related: DCU’s The Brave and the Bold: Members of the Bat Family We Want To See


Dick Grayson’s Nightwing: Past & Future

Warner Bros. Television Distribution

Even without McKay’s Nightwing film, the character will likely have a home in James Gunn and Peter Safran’s DCU. Dick Grayson was the Batman’s original partner, Robin the Boy Wonder, and he first appeared in the pages of Detective Comics No. 38 in 1940. Prior to the events of the Crisis on Infinite Earths (1985-1986), a grown-up Grayson would willingly pass on the mantle of Robin to the second boy to ever don the iconic yellow, red and green costume, Jason Todd. The historical moment, which came during the pre-Crisis origin of Jason Todd, occurs in the pages of Batman No. 368 (February 1984).

Three months later, in July of 1984, Grayson dons the identity of Nightwing for the first time in Tales of the Teen Titans No. 44. In an entirely new and rebooted destiny (post-Crisis Jason Todd origin), Dick’s Robin is shot and nearly killed by the Joker in the pages of Batman No. 408. In the new timeline, Bruce Wayne fires Dick for nearly getting himself killed, and he is forced to give up the role of Robin — only to become Nightwing again.

Gunn’s DCU will include a Batman film titled The Brave and the Bold. Gunn’s version of The Dark Knight will feature a story that focuses on an altogether different Robin: Bruce Wayne and Talia al Ghul’s biological son, Damian Wayne. And Gunn went on record saying the film is the “beginning of the Bat Family in the DCU.” So, it’s almost a certainty that Dick Grayson will show up in Gunn and Safran’s upcoming world of superheroes — it just won’t be Chris McKay’s vision of the character.

Source link

Summary Filmmaker Chris McKay's Nightwing

The latest episode of VGC: A Video Games Podcast is now available on all major audio platforms.

This week, VGC’s Jordan Middler and Chris Scullion discuss all things Opening Night Live, Immortals of Aveum, Xbox‘s backwards compatibility woes and, naturally, a few words on the late great Terry Funk.

VGC: A Video Game Podcast is now available every week on YouTube, but you can get the audio version slightly earlier in the day on your podcast platform of choice.

Notice: To display this embed please allow the use of Functional Cookies in Cookie Preferences.

Notice: To display this embed please allow the use of Functional Cookies in Cookie Preferences.

VGC: A Video Games Podcast episodes are available weekly, hosted by VGC’s Jordan Middler, Chris Scullion and Andy Robinson, and broadcaster Pete Donaldson, featuring regular special guests from across the games industry.

The weekly show is produced by Stak, the company behind some of the UK’s biggest podcasts, including Football Ramble, JaackMaate’s Happy Hour and Abroad in Japan.

You can subscribe to VGC: A Video Games Podcast now on iTunes, Spotify, Amazon Music and more.