A video meme Twitter account has used the site’s Twitter Blue video feature to upload the Illumination film “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” in its entirety, where it was seen by millions of users before being taken down.
The movie, which was posted on Saturday evening in two parts by a page with 1.1 million followers titled “vids that go hard,” stayed online for at least seven hours before being taken down by Twitter moderators. Forbes reports that the video was watched at least 9 million times.
The leak was possible thanks to a feature available exclusively to Twitter Blue subscribers that allows them to upload high quality videos of up to one hour in length. On Sunday morning, after the video was taken down, the owner of the account responded by posting the DreamWorks animated film “Bee Movie” in the same two-part format. That, too, was taken down.
TheWrap has reached out to the film’s distributor, Universal Pictures, for comment.
Since its purchase by Elon Musk last year, Twitter has seen significant layoffs. This past January, Bloomberg reported that Twitter was signifcantly paring down its content moderation team following the layoffs of 3,700 employees and the resignation of hundreds more in November 2022.
“The Super Mario Bros. Movie,” meanwhile, has become the first animated movie since the pandemic began to gross $1 billion at the global box office.
It was night two for Maná in Chicago at the United Center on Saturday (April 29), but it was the 12th show overall for the Mexican rock band who’s been on the road with their México Lindo Y Querido Tour in the United States since March.
“Tonight, we have to beat the excitement we’ve felt in other cities throughout our tour,” Fher Olvera, the band’s frontman, informed the crowd — which roared in response, obviously up for the challenge. “We’ve missed you all so much,” he continued. “It’s been more than three years since we were last here. Latinos have gained so much territory in Chicago. We feel at home here, like if we were in Mexico.”
Rocking black nails, skintight black jeans and a blue jacket, Olvera was the ultimate rockero. And so were his bandmates — Alex González, Sergio Vallín and Juan Calleros — whose typical uniform includes dark jeans, T-shirts and/or black vests. “Age is just an attitude,” Olvera, 63, stated. “You see Mick Jagger from the Rolling Stones who’s almost 80 and he’s still rocking out. I don’t know if I’ll get to that point.” After watching him work the stage, even after a suffering a knee injury earlier this year, Olvera is clearly in his prime. With his signature raspy vocals, he serenaded a crowd that hadn’t seen the band live since they last performed in this city in 2019 with their Rayando el Sol Tour.
As ever, Maná’s concerts are the type where you know you’re going to get hit with the classics, which means you’ll be on your feet and singing at the top of your lungs over the course of two hours, the duration of the group’s set. This concert was no exception. The show featured a stacked setlist including hits from albums released over the span of three decades, such as ¿Dónde Jugarán Los Niños?, Cuando Los Ángeles Lloran, Sueños Líquidos and Revolución de Amor.
The songs that were part of the setlist included “Cómo Te Deseo,” “De Pies a Cabeza,” “Labios Compartidos,” “Vivir Sin Aire,” “Eres Mi Religión,” “Mariposa Traicionera,” “En El Muelle de San Blas,” “Me Vale” and “Clavado En Un Bar,” to name a few.
They closed with the ’90s anthem “Rayando el Sol.” “Thank you for the love, Chicago. Thank you for the affection,” Olvera said, expressing gratitude for a city that has welcomed the band with open arms for more than 30 years. To return the love, they’ve announced a third show at the city’s United Center for later this year on Oct. 1.
A testament to their timeless rock-en-Español anthems and performance prowess, Maná kicked off their trek in March, just months after an unprecedented sold-out residency at the Kia Forum in Los Angeles last year. “The main thing is our shows are a big party and a celebration of life,” González previously told Billboard Español. “We are excited to continue that celebration and share it with more people across the United States.” Olvera added, “We don’t take this for granted. It’s amazing to feel the love from all our Latin fans across the world. It’s an honor to represent our heritage.”
As one of the most important Latin pop-rock bands, Maná’s career spans over three decades. Throughout the years, the band has scored 10 No. 1s on Billboard’s Hot Latin Songs chart and eight No. 1s on Top Latin Albums.
Maná’s México Lindo Y Querido Tour continues with stops in cities such as Atlanta, Las Vegas, Greensboro and two back-to-back shows in Los Angeles, among other cities. Here’s more info on upcoming dates and tickets.
TORONTO — On an evening that started with no small amount of chaos, newly acquired Toronto FC forward C.J. Sapong continued his career-long tradition of making a good first impression.
After kickoff was delayed for 18 minutes Saturday night due to a fire alarm at BMO Field and Toronto lost fullback Raoul Petretta to injury in the warm-up, Toronto and New York City FC played a drab, scoreless opening half before an announced crowd of 21,847.
It took less than a minute into the second half for Sapong to give Toronto a 1-0 lead that stood up the rest of the Major League Soccer match. The ball went to Richie Laryea six passes from the kickoff and the fullback outraced Kevin O’Toole before sending over a low cross through defenders that Sapong tapped in before NYCFC captain James Sands could corral him.
It marked Sapong’s 89th regular-season goal and his first since last May. The 13-year veteran has now scored in his first starts for Sporting Kansas City, Chicago, Nashville and Toronto.
Story continues below advertisement
A philosophic Sapong credited his fast starts to the energy and challenge of new surroundings.
“Adversity is something that throughout my life I’ve learned to kind of just welcome,” he said. “I’ve learned on the other side of those things there’s always opportunities for growth.
“There’s ebbs and flows in life so I ride the waves when they’re at their peaks, knowing there’s going to be opposite moments but just soaking in the positive moments as much as possible.”
His first goal for Nashville came in a start that followed three substitute appearances. But the opening goals for Sporting Kansas City, Chicago and Toronto came in his first outing for the teams.
Sapong becomes the sixth player in MLS history to score on debut for at least three different teams, joining Roy Lassiter, Ante Razov, Kenny Cooper, Kei Kamara and Christian Ramirez.
“CJ gives us something a little bit different,” said Toronto coach Bob Bradley.
“He’s unselfish with his running in the box,” he added. “Tonight he got the goal but when you have a striker who runs hard in the box, it often times does a lot to create chances for others. He brings a lot of good qualities.”
Kickoff was delayed by the fire alarm with referee Armando Villarreal sending the players back to the locker-rooms after a period of waiting on the field. The pre-game fireworks at the stadium seemed more intense than usual, leaving a heavy bank of smoke above the field.
Story continues below advertisement
The game, originally scheduled to start at 7:39 p.m. ET, eventually kicked off at 7:57 p.m.
Italian star Lorenzo Insigne, a former Napoli skipper, captained Toronto in the absence of the injured Michel Bradley and Jonathan Osorio. Sapong started up front between Insigne and fellow Italian Federico Bernardeschi.
Petretta was a late scratch after not feeling right in warm-up for Toronto with 19-year-old Kobe Franklin making his first MLS start in his place.
Neither team managed to accomplish much in the first half with Toronto spending more time in the New York end but failing to take advantage despite Insigne doing his best to both create chances and threaten himself.
Toronto (2-2-6) is now unbeaten in five matches at home (2-0-3) this season and has lost just two of its last 12 games (4-2-6) at BMO Field.
“We got a bunch of good performances,” said Bob Bradley. “A bunch of guys played well.”
It was a palate cleanser after a lopsided 4-2 loss last Saturday at Philadelphia that saw the Union build a 4-0 lead before taking its foot off the gas. That defeat ended a run of four straight draws and a seven-game unbeaten streak (1-0-6) for TFC, which came into Saturday’s game winless in five (0-1-4).
New York (4-3-3) was coming off a 3-1 home victory over FC Dallas. NYCFC arrived north of the border unbeaten in four games (2-0-2) and had lost just once in its previous eight outings (4-1-3) since a season-opening 2-0 loss at Nashville.
Story continues below advertisement
But while NYCFC is 4-0-1 at home, it has yet to win on the road in league play this season (0-2-3).
NYCFC was 6-8-3 away from home in league play last year when it finished third in the Eastern Conference, 21 points above 13th-place Toronto.
The game was Toronto goalkeeper Sean Johnson’s first against the team he used to captain. The 33-year-old Johnson, who joined TFC as a free agent in January, made 206 appearances in all competitions for NYCFC, logging 18,660 minutes and recording 60 clean sheets over five seasons.
Luis Barraza, Johnson’s former understudy, started for NYCFC. Johnson had little to do in a first half spent mostly in New York territory.
Toronto outshot New York 11-5 (6-1 in shots on target). Sapong had four of those shots.
Spain’s Alonso Coello, in just his third start, led Toronto with 90 touches and was solid in midfield. Insigne was next on the team with 83 touches, digging deep into his bag of tricks on the left flank.
Toronto was once again missing key personnel.
Michael Bradley missed his third straight game with a lower leg injury. Osorio injured his knee in training Thursday, suffering a strained medial collateral ligament while Vazquez has gone to his native Spain to have a specialist check out a foot problem. Fullback Cristian Gutierrez (non-COVID illness) was also absent.
Story continues below advertisement
Centre back Matt Hedges returned from a two-game absence after going through concussion protocols. Veteran forward Adama Diomande, who has been out since March 4 with a hamstring issue, came off the bench in stoppage time.
UP NEXT
Toronto hosts the New England Revolution next Saturday.
Michael J. Fox, 61, doesn’t believe he will live to be 80 years old as his Parkinson’s diagnosis continues to progress. “Yeah, it’s banging on the door,” he said on CBS Sunday Morningto host Jane Pauley in an interview that aired Sunday, April 30, referencing the end of his life. “All these subtle ways that gets you. … You don’t die from Parkinson’s. You die with Parkinson’s. So I’ve been thinking about the mortality of it. … I’m not gonna be 80. I’m not gonna be 80,” the actor, who is telling his story in documentary Still: A Michael J. Fox Movie on Apple TV+, said.
“Yeah, I mean, I’m not gonna lie. It’s getting hard, it’s getting harder. It’s getting tougher. Every day it’s tougher. But that’s the way it is. I mean, you know, who do I see about that?” the Back To The Future icon added of the challenging disease, which he was diagnosed with in 1991 — but didn’t publicly confirm that he had Parkinson’s until seven years later.
Parkinson’s disease is defined as a a neurological disorder that can cause “unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination,” according to the official website for the National Institute on Aging in the U.S. As the disease progresses, those affected begin to have difficulties with basic activities such as walking and speaking, along with leading to “behavioral changes, sleep problems, depression, memory difficulties, and fatigue.” Statistically, the disease affects many more men than women. There is also no known cure for the condition that affects around 500,000 Americans per the National Institute of Health.
Michael J. Fox was diagnosed with Parkinson’s in 1991, and is talking about his health and challenges in a new AppleTV+ documentary. (Charles Sykes/Invision/AP/Shutterstock)
In the same interview, he also explained that a surgery to remove a benign tumor on his spinal cord, as well as falls that have lead to broken bones, have all “messed up” his ability to walk.
As Michael was only 29 at the time of his diagnosis, he has struggled with progressing Parkinson’s through most of his marriage to wife Tracy Pollan, 62, who he shares four children with: Sam Michael, 34, Schuyler Frances, 29, Aquinnah Kathleen, 29, and Esmé Annabelle, 23.“We were just married when I was diagnosed,” he said to CBS back in 2022. “We’ve been married for 32 years, I’ve been diagnosed for 30 years. Very early in the marriage she got this dumped on,” he also said at the time.
Still: A Michael J. Fox Movie on Apple TV+ begins streaming on May 12, 2023.
Mounting concerns over young people’s mental health have prompted state legislatures across the country to propose a slew of age restrictions to protect minors online. Lawmakers say the rules should help shield young people from online pornography, predators and harmful social media posts.
The current push for age restrictions on certain online content echoes a similar legislative drive three decades ago, when the internet was in its infancy. In 1996, Congress passed a major telecommunications bill that made it illegal to knowingly send or display “obscene or indecent” material to people under 18.
That law had a longstanding precedent: federal rules dating back to the 1920s that prohibited radio and TV shows from broadcasting obscene language, to prevent a child wandering into a living room from overhearing it.
The anti-pornography rules in the 1990s had strong bipartisan support. But civil liberties groups thought the prohibitions on online indecency violated the First Amendment and squelched free speech. Among other objections, they said it was too difficult and expensive for websites to verify a visitor’s age. That could have led sites to simply get rid of anything inappropriate for children, creating a Disneyfied internet.
To protect Americans’ access to information that could potentially be deemed indecent under the new law — like educational material about AIDS — the American Civil Liberties Union sued the government, challenging part of the law called the Communications Decency Act.
The A.C.L.U. wanted its name on the lawsuit, said Chris Hansen, a former senior lawyer for the group. But to be a plaintiff, the group needed to be directly threatened by the law and there was nothing on its website that could potentially “harm” children. So the A.C.L.U. uploaded a Supreme Court ruling concerning a riff by the comedian George Carlin on the seven dirtiest words in the English language, which included a transcript of Mr. Carlin’s monologue in all its un-bleeped glory.
The A.C.L.U. also posted a quiz asking readers to guess the seven obscenities.
After a federal court in Philadelphia temporarily halted the law, the government appealed, and the case, Reno v. A.C.L.U., named for Bill Clinton’s attorney general, Janet Reno, was taken up by the Supreme Court. There, the A.C.L.U. argued that the law’s speech restrictions could curb the internet’s unique potential and prevent people — including minors — from having access to all kinds of information.
The A.C.L.U. contended that the internet, where users typed or clicked to get to a web page, was more like a book or newspaper than radio or TV, recalled Ann Beeson, a former assistant legal director for the group.Language in printed material, which individuals freely perused, was more lightly regulated than in broadcast media, where audiences had less control over what they were exposed to.
The justices at the time were not especially familiar with the internet. So court employees arranged a demonstration to show how easy it was to find pornography. Senator Ted Cruz, then a Supreme Court law clerk, later recounted how he, alongside Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, had looked at “hard-core, explicit” image results for a search of a fruit sometimes used as a bawdy euphemism for breasts.
The Supreme Court ultimately sided with the A.C.L.U., finding that the federal restrictions could chill free speech.
The judges said the blanket restrictions were unacceptable because parents would soon be able to use content-filtering software to protect their children, and because age-verification systems at the time, which had typically involved verifying a user’s credit card, were not yet widely available. (That has changed; today, many current online age-checking systems use credentials like a driver’s licenses to verify a user’s age. One vendor said they were now easily integrated and cost as little as 10 cents per visitor.)
In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld a longstanding principle in American law that “you can’t censor speech to adults in the name of protecting minors,” Mr. Hansen said. If the A.C.L.U. had lost, “the internet would not be what it currently is.”
But that was before the current, “extremely online” era in which critics say powerful social media algorithms have promoted hateful, divisive comments; scaled disinformation; and recommended posts on anorexia and self-harm to young girls.
To try to bolster online safeguards for children, California last year enacted the Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. The legislation would require online services that are likely to be used by young people — such as social media and video game platforms — to default to the highest privacy settings possible for minors.
It would also require those services to turn off by default features that could pose risks to minors, such as friend finders that might allow adult strangers to contact children.
A tech industry association, NetChoice, has now sued to block the children’s protections from taking effect next year. In a legal complaint filed in December, NetChoice said the restrictions would stifle important resources for users of all ages, echoing arguments made by the A.C.L.U. in the 1990s.
In March, the Congressional Research Service, a public policy institute that serves Congress, also weighed in, urging lawmakers to consider the possible unintended consequences of new online age restrictions — such as companies collecting more user data and limiting content.
Even so, lawmakers continue to propose new online age and content rules.
Last week in the Senate, Brian Schatz, a Hawaii Democrat, promised his new child online protection bill “will help us stop the growing social media health crisis among kids by setting a minimum age.”
We are cheerleaders! Bring It On became an instant cinematic classic when it debuted in August 2000, thanks to knockout performances from Kirsten Dunst, Gabrielle Union and more cast members.
The comedic film followed a group of rival cheerleaders as they competed to win a national championship amid allegations of cheating, blossoming love and plenty of other run-of-the-mill teen drama. Dunst (Torrance Shipman), Union (Isis), Eliza Dushku (Missy Pantone) and Jesse Bradford (Cliff Pantone) led the cast.
“[I was shooting] in Prague, and I remember not turning it down, exactly, but not being super sure about it,” Dunst told Entertainment Weekly in October 2015. “I was like, ‘A cheerleading movie?’ It sounded like it could have been just a cheesy teen movie, but what sealed the deal for me was talking to the director, Peyton Reed, on the phone — he was just so smart. I agreed to do it mostly because of Peyton.”
Union, for her part, did not have to audition due to her previous roles in teen films like 10 Things I Hate About You and She’s All That, but that does not mean the role came easily to her. “I played soccer, basketball and track, and nothing can prepare you for what cheerleaders go through,” she admitted. “Those rehearsals were some of the lower points in my life — I questioned my very existence. Everything hurt. That’s probably why there are a lot of close-ups of me, not wide shots.”
The fan fervor surrounding the movie has stuck with the cast too. “Even when I’m promoting different movies or my TV show, people still want to talk about Bring It On,” Union noted. “When I run into Katie Couric, it’s the first thing she talks about.”
Those who love Bring It On do not always get the quotes right, though. “I get lines from the spoof — ‘It’s already been broughten,’” Union said. “I don’t remind them that that actually wasn’t in our movie.”
Dunst, meanwhile, was none the wiser until her costar filled her in. “That wasn’t?” she replied, laughing. “I thought it was.”
While celebrating the film’s 20th anniversary in August 2020, the cast threw around ideas for a potential sequel. “Kirsten, maybe we’re, like, coheads of the PTA,” Union suggested, to which Dunst replied: “Or we run a cheer school, like [on the Netflix docuseries] Cheer.”
Sign up for Us Weekly’s free, daily newsletter and never miss breaking news or exclusive stories about your favorite celebrities, TV shows and more!
Scroll down to discover what the cast of Bring It On accomplished after the movie took off in 2000!
It was “E.T. the Extra-Terrestial” that turned David Lowery into a lifelong fan of “Peter Pan,” specifically the scene in which a mother reads the section about Tinkerbell’s possible death to her daughter while the friendly alien hides in the closet. “You just watch E.T. listening to that story, and it’s so emotionally resonant that it hooked me to ‘Peter Pan,’ no pun intended, more than any film version of it did early on,” Lowery said.
For his second live-action retelling of a classic Disney film — following “Pete’s Dragon” (2016) — Lowery imagined his own variation on Neverland in “Peter Pan & Wendy,” with the young actors Alexander Molony and Ever Anderson in the title roles and Jude Law as the villainous Captain Hook. Initially, however, Lowery underestimated the task.
“When I first took the job, I thought, ‘It’s Peter Pan, how hard could it be?’ It turned out to be the hardest but most exhilarating creative endeavor I’ve done to date,” he said. The difficulty, he thinks, stemmed from his desire to introduce a new shade to a fairy tale while honoring the story’s legacy.
The original J.M. Barrie novel about Peter Pan and Wendy as well as the numerous film adaptations — Steven Spielberg’s “Hook,” P.J. Hogan’s “Peter Pan,” Joe Wright’s “Pan” and, of course, Disney’s 1953 animated rendering, among them — all swirled in Lowery’s mind as he reconsidered the boy who never grows up.
Speaking during a recent video interview from Cologne, Germany, Lowery, 42, laid out some of the less obvious influences for his reimagining of “Peter Pan & Wendy,” now streaming on Disney+.
Peter Pan’s Flight at Disneyland
To remain faithful to Disney’s take on “Peter Pan,” Lowery closely observed Peter Pan’s Flight, one of the original rides at Disneyland based on the 1953 film. The attraction, he said, “represents the movie distilled into a physical experience.” Although stunningly crafted, some the animated film’s defining iconography, most notably the image of Captain Hook straddling the jaws of the crocodile, has a greater impact on younger audiences when they see it immortalized in three dimensions in Peter Pan’s Flight.
That the old-fashioned theatrical illusions the ride employs, like the use of forced perspective for London’s skyline, could still elicit wonder even in an age of digital effects, impressed him. Lowery rode Peter Pan’s Flight while preparing to shoot “Peter Pan & Wendy,” and hearing the excited reactions of children and adults alike reminded him of how beloved the animated version is. “Seeing this film condensed into a theme park ride, I realized the weight that these stories, as told by Disney, have in popular culture,” he said.
‘Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom’
Lowery first watched the Steven Spielberg action adventure at the tender age of 7, and it immediately ignited his creative aspirations. “It’s a real kitchen-sink experience,” he said. “It’s a musical, it’s a drama, it’s a romance, it’s a horror film.” For the emotional approach to “Peter Pan & Wendy,” Lowery drew on the eclectic tone of “Temple of Doom” as well as its juvenile sense of humor.
When creating the pirate hideout Skull Rock, Lowery tried to evoke the underground mines, in a cavernous space illuminated by lava, where the film’s Temple of Doom was located. “There’s also one shot in particular of Tiger Lily, the Lost Boys and Wendy looking down as John and Michael are about to be executed that is a direct homage to Indy, Willie Scott and Short Round looking down into the temple as the poor gentleman is about to be sacrificed to Kali,” Lowery explained.
Andrei Tarkovsky
Lowery sought to reconceptualize how Peter Pan and Tinkerbell are introduced to the Darling children. As he wrote the sequence in which Tinkerbell sprinkles Wendy with pixie dust, ostensibly to float her all the way to Neverland before she wakes up, the image of the sleeping woman levitating in the Russian auteur Andrei Tarkovsky’s surrealist “Mirror” (1975) came to mind. He added a screen grab of that moment to his look-book and then replicated it with Wendy.
‘Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World’
To differentiate his movie from traditional pirate films, including Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” franchise, Lowery looked to Peter Weir’s 2003 high-seas saga, which informed how he thought about Captain Hook and his crew. Instead of mere scoundrels, Lowery saw Captain Hook’s men as pirates playacting as soldiers and Hook himself as a decaying version of Captain Jack Aubrey (played by Russell Crowe in “Master and Commander”).
“I thought, ‘What if Captain Hook at some point commandeered a Napoleonic vessel and executed all the other soldiers on board and he and his pirates took over this ship and he now thought of himself as an admiral on the HMS Bounty?” Lowery said. To help the actors, the director brought in consultants to teach them how to realistically operate a ship. One bit of unexpected synchronicity: John DeSantis, who plays Bill Jukes in Lowery’s fantasy, also appeared in Weir’s Oscar-winning film.
Since Captain Hook is horrified at the notion that he has grown up, Lowery introduced the idea that he dyes his hair. “He wants to maintain his youth as an affront to Peter,” Lowery explained. The inspiration came from Luchino Visconti’s “Death in Venice”: In the Italian director’s historical drama, an aging composer played by Dirk Bogarde colors his hair and wears makeup to appear younger. “At the end, when he’s on the beach, the hair dye just starts running down his face, exposing the deceit at the heart of Bogarde’s character,” Lowery said.
Bill the Butcher and ‘Candyman’
For Captain Hook’s image, Lowery drew from multiple sources. When he first pitched the project to the studio, he edited a hook for a hand onto a photo of a mustachioed Daniel Day-Lewis in 19th-century attire as Bill the Butcher in Martin Scorsese’s “Gangs of New York.” “That became the Captain Hook I saw in my mind while I was writing the script,” he recalled.
With the hook itself, Lowery wanted to stay away from the precise, shiny devices used in other adaptations, like Spielberg’s “Hook.” The one Jude Law would wield in “Peter Pan & Wendy” had to look like a less refined, “pugilistic instrument of violence.” Lowery gave the prop department an image of the actor Tony Todd in Bernard Rose’s 1992 horror film “Candyman,” about a ghostly killer with a hook for a missing hand. “We want it to be rusty,” Lowery added, “and to feel like it was a piece of metal that he pulled from the boat and had a blacksmith hammer into a barely usable form.”
‘Raising Arizona’
There’s a vivid montage near the end of Lowery’s movie that shows Wendy’s adult life. She overcomes nostalgia and embraces the potential that lies ahead. “I wanted to capture the idea that growing up could be a beautiful thing,” he said. The montage is an allusion to a sequence, known as “Dream of the Future,” in the offbeat Coen brothers comedy “Raising Arizona,” in particular the shot where the kidnapper H. I. McDunnough (played by Nicolas Cage) imagines himself and his wife in old age with their large family gathered around a table. “As someone who is still in the process of growing up, it’s really helpful for me, on a therapeutic level, to see a character look at the future with a sense of wonder and anticipation,” Lowery said.
Director James Gunn cast Iwuji in the role after working with him on 2022’s Peacemaker and, according to the Vol. 3 star, because the High Evolutionary was a challenge both on and off-screen.
Guardians Vol. 3 Star Talks Problematic Marvel Villain
Marvel
In talking with DEK Magazine, Chukwudi Iwuji shed new light on his Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3‘s villain and Marvel’s struggles with the character.
According to Iwuji, James Gunn wanted him for the High Evolutionary in order to “lay my stamp on it” and because the director saw “things in me so far that he wanted more of:”
“I knew that James wouldn’t have approached me to do it if he didn’t want me to lay my stamp on it. There was never a world where he was going to want me to do something that didn’t resonate with me. The reason he wanted me to do it is that he’d seen some things in me so far that he wanted more of.”
In addition, the actor claimed Gunn felt “Marvel was struggling” with the decision to make High Evolutionary the antagonist as he’s “not your normal superhero villain:”
“He [Gunn] felt that this character, that Marvel was struggling to get their heads around, is not your normal superhero villain. But even if it wasn’t the truly complex Shakespearean role that it turned out to be as we collaborated, I would have been interested anyway. I love this thing.”
Marvel Studios’ alleged difficulties with the High Evolutionary character are understandable.
In the comics, the High Evolutionary – who began as a genetic scientist named Herbert Edgar Wyndham – experimented on animals, created a self-healing suit for himself, and established alternate versions of Earth, including Counter-Earth.
Marvel Comics
He also evolved his own intelligence and powers to that of cosmic beings.
In addition to telepathy and telekinesis, he could evolve and devolve life forms and manipulate matter at a subatomic level. In fact, at one point, Galactus had difficulties defeating him.
While the High Evolutionary is a significant threat, he’s not one-dimensional. In fact, the comics have shown him to be well-intentioned and even compassionate at times.
However, just like the Guardians films themselves, Iwuji discovered that challenges were often offset with humor.
The actor shared how he could watch Mantis’ Pom Klementieff“pour a glass of water and I’ll find something funny in it:”
“Chris Pratt can crack jokes constantly, self-deprecating or situational … he’s great at that. Sean Gunn, his jokes come out of nowhere – you think you’re seeing something serious, then you take a moment and go, ‘Oh my God, that was a joke, wasn’t it?!’ I can watch Pom [Klementieff] pour a glass of water and I’ll find something funny in it. Karen [Gillan] has a real Scottish dry wit, and then, of course, James is just like a sci-fi Mel Brooks.”
The Problem With the High Evolutionary
Again, it’s no wonder that Marvel Studios reportedly struggled with this villain.
A sometimes well-intentioned baddie with a penchant for animal experimentation was problematic alone, not to mention his history of creating alternate worlds.
However, it’s possible that the High Evolutionary’s powerset proved to be a challenge as, on paper, the Guardians don’t stand a chance.
Knowing now this baddie was difficult to adapt, it will be all the more interesting to see Chukwudi Iwuji’s take on the role when Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 premieres.
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 arrives in theaters on Friday, May 5.
DC just released a brand-new TV spot for Shazam! Fury of the Gods through the Grammys. The video just hit the web and showcases some new footage from the forthcoming DC Comics adaptation. With over a month of wait until the release date of Shazam! Fury of the Gods on the big screen, DC releases some new footage to entice the fans.
Directed by David F. Sandberg, Shazam! Fury of the Gods is a sequel to the 2019 film Shazam! Zachary Levi leads the all-star cast ensemble as the titular role, and he will be joined by Rachel Zegler, Lucy Liu, Helen Mirren, Ross Butler, Grace Caroline Currey, Asher Angel, Jack Dylan Grazer and a lot more.
The latest TV spot highlights the conflict between the daughters of Atlas. Helen Mirren, Lucy Liu and Rachel Zegler will be portraying sisters Hespera, Kalypso and Anthea respectively and the 30-second video showed the intense battle between the sisters. The video also showed Shazam’s involvement in the fierce clash of the sisters.
Sandberg was pretty excited to release the film, and it seemed like a dream come true for him since he got to work with Mirren and Liu. He said to Entertainment Weekly “It was a dream to work with them. We aimed high when we cast the movie, and we got exactly what we wanted.” He continued “They’re both so kickass. You kind of have an expectation, like, ‘Oh, it’s Dame Helen entering the set!’ But the first day she came on, she’s like, ‘Yeah! We need more p—y power on set! We’re here now!’ and I was like, ‘Oh, okay!'”
Still Over A Month Left Before Shazam! Fury of the Gods Explodes on The Big Screen
Warner Bros. Pictures
DC describes the synopsis as follows “Bestowed with the powers of the gods, Billy Batson and his fellow foster kids are still learning how to juggle teenage life with having adult Super Hero alter-egos. But when the Daughters of Atlas, a vengeful trio of ancient gods, arrive on Earth in search of the magic stolen from them long ago, Billy—aka Shazam—and his family are thrust into a battle for their superpowers, their lives, and the fate of their world.”
Aside from Shazam! Fury of the Gods, three more DC films will hit the theaters this year. The Flash, Blue Beetle and Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom are all in post production at the Warner Bros.
Of course, comedian and WHCD host Roy Wood Jr. took a swipe at the Vanderpump Rules cheating scandal during his speech, which means President Joe Biden has been made aware of the reality TV scandal—if he wasn’t already following the drama like the rest of us.
Twitter content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
“Scandals have been devouring careers this year,” Wood Jr. said. “The untouchable Tucker Carlson is out of a job… but to Tucker’s staff, I want you to know that I know what you’re feeling. I work at The Daily Show, so I too have been blindsided by the sudden departure of the host of a fake news program. Tucker got caught up. Got caught up like that dude from Vanderpump Rules.”
He continued, “I don’t know what Vanderpump Rules is about, I’ve watched it a couple of times. My friends told me it’s like BMF but for white people. Or is that Succession? No, Succession is Power for white people. No, Tucker Carlson is Power for white people. No, that’s white power—you know what, never mind.”
If Biden wasn’t already Team Ariana, he probably is now. There’s only one question I have left: Do you think Ariana Madix scored a ticket to the Met Gala?
Ali Skovbye, the actor who plays teenage Tully in Firefly Lane, isn’t ready to say goodbye to the Netflix adaptation of Kristin Hannah’s novel yet, and neither are we. But Season 2, Part 2 of Firefly Lane marks the final chapter in Kate Mularkey (Sarah Chalke) and Tully Hart’s (Katherine Heigl) story, so fans won’t want to miss a moment of the emotional farewell. A heartbreaking Season 2, Part 1 ending showed the best friends in the middle of a major blowout. Kate had just learned some devastating news, and Tully just accepted a job far from home. The seven new episodes in Season 2, Part 2 will answer all your burning questions. Do Kate and Tully make up? Does Tully marry Johnny (Ben Lawson)? Does Kate DIE? All will be revealed, so grab the tissues and get ready for more captivating flashbacks, heartwarming and tearjerking storylines, and major friendship inspo.
Brooke Sheilds takes control of the narrative by sharing her story in her own words in the Hulu documentary Pretty Baby: Brooke Shields, from director Lana Wilson.
From Matador Content and BedBy8 for ABC News Studio, the film follows Shields from her early years as a blossoming model and actress to her present day as a powerful woman, mother, wife and performer with a career spanning more than four decades. It also touches on her complicated relationship with her mother and manager Teri Shields and how working on early projects including Louis Malle’s Pretty Baby, Randal Kleiser’s The Blue Lagoon and Franco Zeffirelli’s Endless Love — all before age 16 — left her vulnerable to public criticism and unwanted attention from adult men.
Now, Shields is ready to tell her story in her own words.
“It was the right time, and it also felt very good to finally — you know, nobody really ever asked me my opinion and nobody was really interested in it,” Shields said during a panel for the film at Deadline’s Contenders Television: Documentary + Unscripted virtual event. “They wanted the narrative to be what they wanted to project onto it. So it was very important and very special for me to be able to say, ‘OK, you’ve all said what you had to say, now let me tell you the truth.’”
Shields knew she was in the right hands with Wilson, already having been a fan of her body of work. But even with the right people on her team, the journey was emotional for the Suddenly Susan actress.
“It was everything; it was definitely very emotional,” she reflected. “There were parts of it that were cathartic. There were parts that made me sad. For the first time ever seeing my whole life all the way through, which I’d never done before, was the first time two things happened: I absolutely marveled at the strength that was always there in this little girl that somehow was stubborn enough to keep going and keep fighting for what she knew she needed in our life and in different ways, and I’m so proud of my body of work. I’ve been so used to being just famous or pretty or infamous or controversial or all of these things. And all the while, I’ve been most motivated and attached only really to my actual talent and how I keep growing and being creative and sort of see it all — it made me very proud.”
While on this journey with Shields, Wilson was impacted by her documentary subject’s story, which taught her a lot about the type of mom she wanted to be.
“I actually became a mother while making this,” she said. “I found it incredibly extra personal and really inspiring looking at Brooke’s life, her relationship with her mom and her relationship with her daughters today. If I could create a dinner table like hers, where my kid is able to speak freely and feel supported, having a family dynamic where people can push back against each other and disagree and debate but also understand and be willing to learn and challenge and grow in the way you see Brooke and her whole family in that final scene of the documentary, I think that would be incredible.
“I also think that right now in the age of social media, there are really thorny issues and questions that don’t have any easy answers,” Wilson added. “I think we’re all just trying to feel good about ourselves within the framework we’ve been given. I’ve personally thought about how I think teenagers should wear whatever they want and express their sexuality and personality and identity however they want. I do think the adults who are making the dominant visual culture of advertisements in movies and TV should really look at what they’re doing. Are we only representing a really narrow slice of what it means to be female and what sexual empowerment looks like? So I hope the documentary is provocative and leaves you with a lot of questions and starts a lot of urgent conversations.”
WASHINGTON— More than a half million of the poorest Americans could be left without health insurance under legislation passed by House Republicans that would require people to work in exchange for health care coverage through Medicaid.
It’s one of dozens of provisions tucked into a GOP bill that would allow for an increase in the debt limit but curb government spending over the next decade. The bill is unlikely to become law, though. It is being used by House Republicans to draw Democrats to the negotiating table and avoid a debt default.
Democrats have strongly opposed the Medicaid work requirement provision, saying it won’t incentivize people to get a job and will drive up the number of uninsured in the country.
Here’s a look at how the proposal might save taxpayers money but cost some Americans access to health care coverage.
Who would be required to work?
The work requirements say able-bodied adults ages 19 to 55 who don’t have children or other dependents would be required to work, train for a job or perform community service to stay on Medicaid. They would have to put in at least 80 hours a month to stay on the government-sponsored health care coverage.
About 84 million people are enrolled in Medicaid, and the Congressional Budget Office estimates 15 million would be subject to the requirement. The Health and Human Services Department, however, predicts millions more — about a third of enrollees altogether — would be required to work.
Why are work requirements controversial?
Republicans say the move would help push Americans into jobs that eventually might put them in a position to move off of government aid.
The requirements would also be more equitable for those who are working to support their families, said House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La.
“That single mom that’s working two or three jobs right now to make ends meet under this tough economy, she doesn’t want to have to pay for somebody who’s sitting at home,” Scalise said.
Democrats argue that work requirements could unfairly push people out of Medicaid, too.
Some people were wrongly kicked off Medicaid in Arkansas when the state briefly introduced work requirements, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told lawmakers. In some cases, people were not required to work but didn’t fill out the required paperwork.
“It’s not just people who are subject to the requirements that often get caught up in red tape,” she said. “It can often be people who are exempted.”
About 1 in 4 people who were required to work lost coverage during Arkansas’ experience with work requirements in 2018.
Work requirements can put Medicaid enrollees in a bind. While no one has been kicked off Medicaid over the last three years because of the pandemic, that changed in April when the federal government required states to review income eligibility for all enrollees to see who now makes too much money to qualify for the health care benefits.
People who picked up work, earned a small raise or switched jobs are finding that those new incomes could soon cost them coverage.
Amy Shaw, 39, of Rochester, New Hampshire, lost her family’s Medicaid coverage in April because of her husband’s 50-cent raise to $17 per hour at an auto parts store. Shaw wouldn’t be subject to the GOP’s work requirement because she has two daughters, but the family’s case illustrates how modest incomes can push people out of Medicaid coverage — and cost them big time.
Suddenly, instead of a $3 copay, she was billed $120 for a cancer screening ordered by her doctor. Meanwhile, their rent increased by 40% since the pandemic started, and the cost of food, utilities and other essential have gone up.
“It just seems like the system is set up so that you don’t want to go back (to work) because you lose more than you gain,” Shaw said. “It makes me not want to go and get my mammogram and my colonoscopy. I don’t even want to go to these appointments because it’s going to cost so much money.”
How much would the Republican proposal save?
That largely depends on how many people who would be required to work opt not to or don’t fill out the proper paperwork to remain covered.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates the requirements would save $109 billion over the next decade. Those savings would come in two ways: from about 600,000 people who would be dropped from Medicaid, then 900,000 who would lose federal funding for their Medicaid, but remain enrolled in the program through their state.
That analysis also says the bill would do little to improve employment among Medicaid enrollees.
What’s next?
The House GOP bill won’t pass a Democratic-controlled Senate or be signed into law by President Joe Biden in its current state.
But don’t expect the issue of work requirements and trimming Medicaid benefits to go away anytime soon. The number of people enrolled in Medicaid has ballooned in recent years, growing by more than 20 million since 2020.
If you ask Democrats, that’s a great thing — they’ve pointed to the record low uninsured rate that’s given more people access to medical care. Democratic-led states have also pitched new ways to expand Medicaid under the Biden administration, granting more access to recently released convicts and new mothers, for example.
Republicans, however, want to scale back safety net programs to pre-pandemic levels. And, Republicans in some states are already trying to implement work requirements of their own. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders asked the federal government to OK a proposal that would move anyone who doesn’t comply with work requirements off Medicaid’s private insurance to traditional fee-for-service Medicaid.
Vanderpump Rulesstar Ariana Madix was living her best life at the 2023 White House Correspondents’ Dinner — and didn’t let a dig at her ex-boyfriend Tom Sandoval’s cheating scandal ruin her evening.
“Scandals have been devouring careers this year,” Daily Show personality Roy Wood Jr. said in his roast on Saturday, April 29, which was broadcast on NBC News. “Tucker [Carlson] got caught up. Got caught up like that dude from Vanderpump Rules.”
The insider added: “She is allowed to date whoever she wants and was having an amazing time at Coachella with Daniel. She’s definitely open to seeing where things go with Daniel, but at the same time, Ariana isn’t totally ready to jump into a serious relationship.”
Madix further proved to be in good spirits at Saturday’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where the Fancy AF Cocktails author looked angelic in a white ballgown and coordinating cape. During Wood’s set, the cameras caught Madix concealing her laughter when she heard the dig at her former partner.
“I don’t know what Vanderpump Rules is about, I’ve watched it a couple of times. My friends told me it’s like BMF but for white people. Or is thatSuccession?” Wood added on Saturday.“No, Succession is Power for white people. No, Tucker Carlson is Power for white people. No, that’s white power — you know what, never mind.”
“I promise I’ll stop posting soon but this was a current experience that I was very grateful to be a part of,” the Give Them Lala Beauty founder, 32, wrote via her Stories on Saturday, sharing a slew of pics from the evening. “Thank you, LA Times.”
Vanderpump, 62, also uploaded the trio’s red carpet pics via her Instagram, referring to the group as the “perfect ménage-à-trois.”
We’re probably only days away from the official unveiling of the Google Pixel 7a, and now unboxing images of the mid-range phone have leaked out online, showing off the design of the handset and two of the colors it’s going to be available in.
The snaps have appeared courtesy of seasoned tipster SnoopyTech (opens in new tab) (via 9to5Google (opens in new tab)), and they reveal a shape, size and aesthetic that’s pretty much as we expected. The familiar Pixel camera bump is visible on the back, for example.
We get a look at the dark gray version of the Pixel 7a, which will apparently be called Cobalt, and the pale blue edition that will be called Arctic Blue. This shade of blue is new for the Pixel series, and has appeared in previously leaked images too.
What’s in the box?
The photos also show us the straightforward packaging that the Google Pixel 7a is going to come in. As with recent models like the Google Pixel 6a, don’t expect there to be a power adapter in the box – you’ll need to buy one separately.
That images like these are appearing now suggests a launch is close. All the signs are that Google is going to announce the phone at the Google IO 2023 event, which gets underway with a keynote presentation on May 10.
We will of course be covering the event live, and bringing you news of everything that Google announces. There should be lots more information about what’s coming with Android 14, as well as quite possibly the Google Pixel Fold.
Analysis: the Pixel 7a looks promising
There’s no way you can really judge a phone before it’s even come out of course, but everything we’ve heard so far about the Pixel 7a – from fairly reliable if unofficial sources – suggests that Google has produced another promising phone in the Pixel series.
The Google Pixel 7 and the Google Pixel 7 Pro impressed us with what they had to offer, on the whole, and so a mid-range version of these phones that makes some sensible trade-offs between performance and price should be an appealing proposition.
When it comes to upgrades over the Pixel 6a, the specs under the hood are going to be significantly better, and there’s also a rumor that Face Unlock will be coming to the Pixel 7a – that would be a first for this mid-range series of handsets, and most welcome.
Only a few days ago we saw the Pixel 7a leak out in a rather attractive orange color, and we like the look of that as well. As always, the price point is going to be very important, so we hope that the phone goes on sale for a reasonable sum.
As has been the case since the start of April, Universal/Illumination’s “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” has lapped the box office competition, becoming the first animated film of the 2020s to gross $1 billion worldwide while competitors search for vastly smaller opening weekends among niche audiences. \
Another strong hold of just a 33% drop has given the film a fourth weekend total of $40 million domestic and $108 million worldwide, pushing the film’s overall totals to $490 million domestic and $1.02 billion global. In the coming week, “Mario” will join “The Incredibles 2” and the “Lion King” remake as just the third animated film to gross over $500 million domestic. With approximately $130 million more, it will pass the $1.15 billion of “Minions” to become Illumination’s highest grossing film ever.
In second is Warner Bros./New Line’s “Evil Dead Rise,” which is holding respectably with a $12.2 million second weekend to give the horror film a 10-day total of $44.4 million. With a $15 million budget, the movie is proving to be a win for both theaters and Warner, which pivoted the horror title’s release from an HBO Max exclusive launch to a full theatrical window.
In third is the top grossing newcomer of the weekend, Lionsgate’s adaptation of Judy Blume’s “Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret.” The coming-of-age film is earning an industry estimated opening of $6.4 million from 3,334 theaters, slightly below the $7-9 million pre-release projections.
With a reported $30 million budget, “Margaret” needs to ride its critical and audience acclaim to a long run in theaters with older female moviegoers. The film has sterling critical scores of 99% on Rotten Tomatoes, an A on CinemaScore and 88% overall positive on PostTrak.
Given that older moviegoers tend to show up in theaters later during a film’s run, it’s possible that “Margaret” could have a long run through Mothers Day weekend, though it will have competition from Focus Features’ “Book Club: The Next Chapter” for its core demo.
Fellow Lionsgate release “John Wick: Chapter 4” is in fourth with $5 million in its sixth weekend. With $176.1 million grossed domestically, the film is now the highest grossing title in the “John Wick” series.
Completing the top 5 is Disney/Lucasfilm’s 40th anniversary re-release of “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi,” which hit 500 theaters and earned an estimated $4.7 million.
The task stumped each of the actors. “I have a ton, but I’d have to really think about it to narrow it down to one,” said Katie Rose Clarke. And Montego Glover asked, “Does ‘all of them’ qualify as an answer?”
Annaleigh Ashford then shared a pick. “Stop worrying if your vision is new. Let others make that decision — they usually do. You keep moving on,” she said, quoting the musical “Sunday in the Park With George.” “I find that to be even more impactful as artists. It’s like, don’t listen to what anybody else says, because they’re always gonna have an opinion anyway.”
Stephen Sondheim, who wrote the music and lyrics of “Sweeney Todd,” “Company,” “Into the Woods,” “A Little Night Music” and “Merrily We Roll Along,” among many others.
(Hulton Deutsch / Corbis via Getty Images)
The group nodded enthusiastically — all eyes are on them as they work on new visions ofworks by Sondheim, who died in late 2021. Ashford currently plays deadly pie shop owner Mrs. Lovett in the gothic “Sweeney Todd” on Broadway; Merle Dandridge stars as glamorous actor Desiree Armfeldt in the romantic web “A Little Night Music,” running at the Pasadena Playhouse through May 28; and Glover, as the commanding but conflicted Witch, leads the national tour of the fairy-tale-based “Into the Woods” (which arrives at the Ahmanson Theatre in late June).
Later this year, Clarke reprises her off-Broadway performance as devoted wife Beth in thereverse-chronological“Merrily We Roll Along” on Broadway; and Britney Coleman kicks off the national tour of “Company,” as perennial singleton Bobbie in the gender-flipped Broadway production (which stops at the Pantages Theatre next summer).
The Times recently gathered these five actors for a discussion about the art of making art: what lessons they’re discovering in texts they thought they already knew well, how they conquer their score’s trickiest rhythms and emotional leaps, and whether these once-experimental works are resonating with today’s audiences. The following conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
(Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Times)
“I honestly think that Sondheim was my first therapist.”
— Merle Dandridge
Do you remember your first time encountering a Sondheim work?
Ashford: I know it sounds strange, but one of the first songs I ever sang as an 8- or 9-year-old girl was “Everything’s Coming Up Roses” [from “Gypsy”]. I remember, even as a little person, understanding that those lyrics were special and they told a story in a different way. As I got more familiar with his work, I learned from my theater community that Sondheim was the goal, and that if you get the opportunity to do Sondheim, you take it, no matter what time and space and place it is.
Glover: Mine was an undergrad class about the history of music theater. I remember thinking, “It doesn’t sound like the other things we’ve been learning about.” He doesn’t write like other people; the structure, the subject matter is different. I felt a real shift, into something that felt closer to me. Then I got cast as Little Red [Riding Hood] in “Into the Woods,” and I was so excited to be on my feet, working on a Sondheim piece for the first time.
Katie Rose Clarke (second from left) as Beth, alongside Lindsay Mendez, Jonathan Groff and Daniel Radcliffe, in “Merrily We Roll Along,” which transfers to Broadway in September.
(Joan Marcus)
Coleman: I also did “Into the Woods,” in high school. I hadn’t heard of Sondheim before, and got cast as the Baker’s Wife. I remember hearing Joanna Gleason’s incredible voice on the cast album and realizing that you don’t have to put a hat on a hat on a hat, you don’t have to add too much to these songs in order to communicate their truths.I 100% attribute that production to why I pursue this professionally today.
Dandridge: Of course, mine was also “Into the Woods” in high school. My choir director rolled out that big old TV with a thick VHS player to show us the PBS presentation, and then I got cast as the Witch, my first leading role. I absolutely fell in love with it. My music theory sensibilities were so piqued and I found myself so interested in this profound investigation into humanity. I honestly think that Sondheim was my first therapist. It sparked a fire in me to pursue this kind of work as a career.
Clarke: I was a college freshman when I auditioned for a production of “Company” — I didn’t get cast, but I ended up assisting on the soundboard, so I watched the show over and over again. It was my first exposure to material like that, because my high school musicals were not that substantive, as far as the material goes, and even in college, it’s still a little bit over our heads. I fell in love with Sondheim from watching the actors try to navigate that material every night.
(Christian K. Lee / For The Times)
“Sondheim is for everyone – not just artists, not just Broadway, not just people in New York, but everyone.”
— Montego Glover
I admit, I’ve had to grow into much of Sondheim’s work. At this point in your life, what are you discovering about the character you play that you hadn’t seen before?
Glover: This “Into the Woods” has some props and no set. It’s very simple storytelling — I mean, the Wolf eats Little Red and it’s literally a pillow under a quilt! It did not cost $10 million, it’s not a heavy-tech element and it works beautifully because it allows what lives inside of actors to come forward. To my delight, things about the Witch that might have been lost on me five, 10, 20 years ago are now like bells ringing so loud and marvelous and unnerving and hopeful and sad — all of it, at the same time. It gets higher and wider and deeper, and it never stops. I’m learning so much about myself, my own skill set and just profound truths about life.
Dandridge: In some ways, I liken Sondheim to Shakespeare in that there’s always something more in the text that maybe I missed or am hearing differently. I went into “A Little Night Music” thinking I knew it, and that someday I’ll play Desiree. But here I am, suddenly old enough to play Desiree, and I am overwhelmingly surprised by how little I knew about the character and this piece. And when you put your voice and your spirit into it, it’s a completely different animal. It’s refreshing and wonderful — Desiree is teaching me, healing me and giving me so much joy.
Annaleigh Ashford as Mrs. Lovett in “Sweeney Todd,” now playing on Broadway.
(Matthew Murphy and Evan Zimmerman)
Clarke: This is my first time performing a Sondheim show. I love Beth [in “Merrily We Roll Along”] so much because she loves so selflessly and fiercely. She’s a mother and she’s experiencing extreme heartbreak and loss. I’m fundamentally a different person since becoming a mom; I approach situations a little bit differently now and I think about things a little bit differently. I know I couldn’t have approached Beth in the same way before having kids myself. It’s exciting that we get to bring our own truth to these stories every night.
Coleman: Like Bobbie [in “Company”], I’ll be turning 35 two months into the tour, and I don’t have a ring on my finger! So I’m grateful for the two-and-a-half-hour-long therapy sessions, and that I will get to bring the country along with me. It’s going to be an incredible privilege to perform “Being Alive” on a bare stage to 3,000-seat houses across the U.S., especially for someone who looks like me. I definitely didn’t grow up seeing women who looked like me lead Sondheim shows, and seeing this panel, in particular, makes me very excited and emotional.
Ashford: It’s like what Sondheim wrote in “Sunday in the Park With George.” “Anything you do, let it come from you. Then it will be new. Give us more to see…” I try to remind myself that this is where I’m supposed to be at this very moment, and whatever comes to the forefront in my body and spirit is what [Mrs. Lovett in “Sweeney Todd”] will be. And I sometimes say a prayer, like, “Alright, Steve, I can’t wait to do puzzles with you tonight,” and do a puzzle in my dressing room. It’s my little thank you to Steve because he loved puzzles, and definitely a reminder that you’re the person doing this puzzle right now.
(Sophie Park / For The Times)
“I love that his shows don’t spoon feed the audience on how to feel.”
— Britney Coleman
As performers inside these shows, what about Sondheim or these revivals do you wish other musical theater producers or creators would adopt more liberally?
Dandridge: Something that’s sticking out to me in our conversation is how much in Sondheim is given to the artist for their interpretation. Britney, you touched on it — historically, the place of people of color in the Sondheim canon. So what on Earth is someone who looks like me doing in 1900s Sweden? I am Black and Korean, and in our production, my mother Madame Armfeldt has been cast as an Asian actress [Jodi Long] because, hey, there was a trade alliance between Sweden and Japan that would have come at the time period that Desiree and Fredrik might have fallen in love for the first time! There is space for everyone and their stories to be elucidated and celebrated in his work because it’s our humanity and our sameness that’s reflected in the text.
Coleman: Yeah. His work not only lets the actor have a moment for interpretation, but also lets the audience have a moment for interpretation. I love that his shows don’t spoon feed the audience on how to feel. A lot of these shows are actually quite polarizing to a lot of people, which is interesting and creates a lot of excellent post-show conversation. So more of that, please.
Montego Glover as the Witch in the national tour of “Into the Woods,” which arrives at the Ahmanson Theatre in June.
(Matthew Murphy and Evan Zimmerman)
Ashford: His body of work for women is extraordinary. The two Sondheim roles I’ve done are “Sunday in the Park With George,” originally created by Bernadette Peters, and “Sweeney Todd,” originally created by Angela Lansbury. These are two big shows about a man that are crafted as a two-hander, with very strong, complicated, dynamic female characters who ultimately have more interesting arcs than the male characters. Maybe, because I played them, they were more interesting to me, but Steve always was interested in making sure that the female counterpoint was equal. He was just authentically interested in good storytelling, and that’s telling the whole, full story of all the humans.
Glover: I feel like Stephen was one of those people who allowed his work to germinate and grow, and he was not in a hurry. I think that’s where you can get into trouble and maybe don’t do your best work. To anyone who is working on anything new right now: Trust your own writing. If you feel you need to gild the lily, then keep working.
Clarke: “Merrily” was one that he continued to work on and refine, because it’s notoriously his biggest flop. And yet, it’s so rich — you could take out any small piece of a song and there’s richness just in that one little tiny nugget within the song. I hope artists always work toward making something more serving to the human experience, something that can actually speak to people and call them to something better.
(Justin Jun Lee / For The Times)
“If you get the opportunity to do Sondheim, you take it, no matter what time and space and place it is.”
— Annaleigh Ashford
You each have at least one iconic song of which devout theater fans inevitably anticipate your take. What’s the most challenging part of that number for you? For example, Annaleigh, where do you breathe in “By the Sea?”
Ashford: I know Steve would have had an opinion about that! I almost emailed him to ask him about little things like that, and I thought, “I’ll wait to get those answers at our first reading.” That ended up being the Monday after he passed away, which was heartbreaking. But I feel like he provides me answers through the text, through all of these women on all of these recordings, ladies who spent time with Steve while they were creating. It’s lovely to have that tape and know that people have been doing this material for years.
Coleman: Bobbie has a whole journey in “Being Alive” that almost feels like it’s on fast-forward: It starts off introspective and quiet, and the realization at the end is a big leap. Trying to make sense of that every night is the hardest part, but I’m in the midst of exploring it.
Merle Dandridge as Desiree Armfeldt in “A Little Night Music,” running at the Pasadena Playhouse through May 28.
(Jeff Lorch)
Dandridge: Again, I thought I knew “Send in the Clowns,” but when I sat down to actually sing it, I was like, “I don’t know this song at all!” And surprisingly, the song has never come out of me the same way twice, which is a different process for me because vocally, I’ve always been a planner. This song is messy and emotional, and the restraint of it is something that catches in my throat and arrests my spirit at times.
It’s also extremely low, which strips me of any techniques or tricks and forces me to be extremely vulnerable and completely honest. I learned it was originally written in a higher key, so I spent some time singing it in that key and I’m still curious about it. But there’s a reason it went into this low space, so I’m trusting him and honoring that choice.
Clarke: “Not a Day Goes By” first makes its appearance when Beth is getting a divorce, so it’s a very broken moment. It was challenging, especially in the first rehearsals, to not give over to the emotional satisfaction of singing that song then, because with each new scene, there’s a time jump and we have to start fresh as if what we just performed hasn’t happened yet. Like Merle said, it’s in keeping it simple and trusting this beautiful representation of complicated things. I hear from people often that the more devastating version of the song is the second one, when she’s getting married, because that scene is so informed by everything the audience has already seen.
Glover: Is it “Stay With Me” or “Witch’s Lament” or “Last Midnight?”I’m still deciding which of the Witch’s songs is the song because, for me, they’re all connected and necessary to her underpinnings. The difficulty every night is staying on the beam, from “Greens” to “Children Will Listen,” and holding it all with a kind of accuracy and emotional will.
(Justin Jun Lee / For The Times)
“The overwhelming audience feedback that I get is that our show makes them think back on their own lives in
new ways.”
— Katie Rose Clarke
Not all Sondheim premieres were decorated hits. This time around, what do you notice about the audiences of these revivals?
Ashford: I think Steve would’ve been so delighted in the volume of folks seeing his shows — people who have seen [previous Broadway productions of “Sweeney Todd”], but also, young people seeing it for the first time. That’s what theater is supposed to be — communal, from the young to the old. And I’m thrilled when I hear gasps because they didn’t know the ending; sometimes people shriek because it’s so shocking to them.
Glover: On the road, I’m noticing that people coming to see the show don’t really know it, but they get incredibly connected to it because it’s this glorious vehicle of truth. I see husbands and wives looking at each other and having silent conversations as the Baker and his wife [share a scene]. I hear mothers exclaiming in exhaustion as Jack’s mother is trying to explain something! I can tell you, the line “I don’t make policy. I just carried it out” brought the house down in [Washington,] D.C. So it’s turning out that Sondheim is for everyone — not just artists, not just Broadway, not just people in New York, but everyone.
Coleman: “Company” allows the audience to have an opinion on Bobbie and all of these relationships around her. There are even moments when she checks in with the audience on this journey, like, “Are you thinking the same thing I’m thinking?” And I love the ending, after “Being Alive,” when she comes back to this birthday cake with candles she’s been trying to blow out for two and a half hours. She finally does, but you don’t actually know what she wished for, and that’s OK. That she made a decision is the achievement.
Dandridge: This all makes me think of that famous Chekhov quote: “The role of the artist is to ask questions, not answer them.” One of my all-time favorite Sondheim shows is “Passion,” which disturbed me so deeply in all the best ways. I think that’s because I encountered it when I was first figuring out what it means to be in love. In investigating these questions, the answers are so vast and broad and nuanced because there are so many ways to interpret and learn from the way he presents these characters and their journeys.
Clarke: Yes, and that’s what audiences are responding to. The overwhelming audience feedback that I get is that our show makes them think back on their own lives in new ways. Whenever we jump in time, we actually break the fourth wall, look at the audience and ask questions like, “How did you get there from here? Why are you here?” It’s exciting to see audiences respond so introspectively by taking it in and taking stock of their own experiences.
Stephen Sondheim, photographed in 2014, died in late 2021.
(Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times)
Last question: If you could play any role in any Sondheim show, what would it be?
Glover: Dot, “Sunday in the Park With George.”
Dandridge: As a full-circle moment, because I played the Witch [in “Into the Woods”] when I was 16, I think I have to do it again.
Clarke: I’d do anything he’s written. Honestly, any role I could score, I would absolutely jump at the chance to do.
Ashford: I’ve always loved the stripper section of “Gypsy.” I’d like to play Electra, but when I’m 80. I want to almost be naked onstage in a way that makes people very uncomfortable and question how they feel about age and their body. Maybe my walker can light up.
Coleman: I think I still have a hot second to play Louise [in “Gypsy”].
Ashford: We could all do “Follies” together in another 40 years. Talk about a plethora of women’s roles!
Dandridge: I’m gonna hold you to that, Annaleigh! We’re doing it.
Arrow alum and Oliver Queen actor Stephen Amell revealed his desire for an Arrowverse movie.
It might be a bit hard to remember for some, but The CW was once home to a robust selection of superhero programming. Dubbed the Arrowverse, the shared TV universe included series like Supergirl, The Flash, and Legends of Tomorrow.
Of course, that same, once-flourishing shared universe was eventually reduced to one series, soon to end. With The Flash‘s series finale imminent, the death of the Arrowverse seems nigh.
Arrow’s Stephen Amell Discusses Movie Desires
DC
Speaking to TVLine, Stephen Amell, star of all eight seasons of Arrow, gave a hopeful response when asked if he thought his days of suiting up as the Green Arrow were over: “I don’t think so.”
Although, as Amell noted, any further role reprisal of his Oliver Queen character would need to be done differently:
“We had a good run on The CW in the Arrowverse but the idea of 22 or 23 episodes a year…. That’s a very specific way to make television, with act breaks and all those things. I had had my fill of playing Arrow in that particular medium.”
What piqued Amell’s interest, however, is “the idea of going back and doing something on a limited basis, or doing a movie.”
The actor would seemingly jump at the chance to portray Green Arrow in a way that isn’t constrained by what is acceptable to be shown on network TV, explaining that on The CW, they were “never allowed to show any blood:”
“We had scenes in our series finale where I must have killed, like, 100 people, but we were never allowed to show any blood. A lot of this hand-to-hand stuff can pack so much more of a punch if we have a little more freedom in terms of what we can show.”
Amell recently made a guest appearance on The Flash’s final season, where it was explained that the current incarnation of his character, the Spectre, can Intervene whenever the Multiverse is in danger. This enabled Amell to don the Green Arrow hood once again.
Could DC Fans Hope for an Arrowverse Movie?
The question of whether the Arrowverse could continue in another form such as a film or limited series isn’t necessarily an easy one to answer.
Firstly, DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran are currently in the process of revamping the DC Universe on film, bringing sweeping changes concerning how things are done with the studio’s live-action/animated shared universe.
The DC visionaries have designated a special category for projects that fall outside their main DCU, however. DC Elseworlds will focus on shows and movies that are out-of-continuity, such as Cartoon Network’s Teen Titans Go!
So, perhaps an Arrowverse follow-up movie could be produced under the Elseworlds banner, despite the top brass specifying that Elsewords is reserved for projects that they deem important or special enough to made.
But the Arrowverse is leaving a fair amount of story content on the table when The Flash ends. The pandemic prevented DC and The CW from ever doing anything with the Justice League team which was established at the end of 2020’s Crisis on Infinite Earths crossover.
Fans want to see that team in action, so there’s definitely fertile ground for a potential movie set after Flash’s series finale that explores the further adventures of the League.
The Flash has but four episodes remaining in its final season. The show airs on Wednesdays on The CW.
Assume that Meta, Google, Microsoft, and other big tech companies soon have their way, and neural interface devices replace keyboards and mice. In that likely future, a large segment of the population will routinely wear neural devices like NextSense’s bio-sensing EEG earbuds, which are designed to be worn twenty-four hours a day. With wide-scale adoption of wearable neurotechnology, adding our brain activity to nationwide identification systems is a near-term reality.
One of the most extraordinary discoveries of modern neuroscience is the uniqueness of each person’s functional brain connection (its physical wiring), especially in the brain areas devoted to thinking or remembering something. Because of this, algorithms can be used to analyze our brain activity and extract features that are both unique to each person and stable over time. How your brain responds to a song or an image, for example, is highly dependent upon your prior experiences. The unique brain patterns you generate could be used to authenticate your identity.
Nationwide identification systems vary by country but generally involve the assignment of unique identification numbers, which can be used for border checks, employment screenings, health-care delivery, or to interact with security systems. These ID numbers are stored in centralized government databases along with other significant personal data, including birth date and place, height, weight, eye color, address, and other information. Most identification systems have long included at least one piece of biometric data, the static photo used in passports and driver’s licenses. But governments are quickly moving toward more expansive biometric features that include the brain.
Biometric characteristics are special because they are highly distinctive and have little to no overlap between individuals. As the artificial intelligence algorithms powering biometric systems have become more powerful, they can identify unique features in the eyes and the face, or even in a person’s behavior. Brain-based biometric authentication has security advantages over other biometric data because it is concealed, dynamic, non-stationary, and incredibly complex.
The promise of greater security has led countries to invest heavily in biometric authentication. China has an extensive nationwide biometric database that includes DNA samples, and it also makes widespread use of facial recognition technology. Chinese authorities in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region have conducted mass collections of biometric data from the Uyghur people and used it for targeted discrimination.
The United States has also massively expanded its collection of biometric data. A recent report by the US Government Accountability Office detailed at least eighteen different federal agencies that have some kind of facial recognition program in place. US Customs and Border Protection includes facial recognition as part of its pre-boarding screening process, and an executive order signed by President Trump in 2017 required the United States’ top twenty airports to implement biometric screening on incoming international passengers.
Increasingly, governments are investing in developing brain biometric measurements. The US Department of Defense recently funded SPARK Neuro, a New York–based company that has been working on a biometric system that combines EEG brain wave data, changes in sweat gland activity, facial recognition, eye-tracking, and even functional near-infrared spectrometry brain imaging (fNIRS), a particularly promising (if expensive) technology for brain authentication, since it is wearable, can be used to monitor individuals over time, can be used indoors or outdoors while a person is moving or at rest, and can be used on infants and children. China has been funneling substantial investments into EEG and fNIRS as well.
For biometric features to be successfully used for authentication, they must have universality, permanence, uniqueness, and be secure against fraud. Over time, static biometrics like facial IDs and fingerprints have become prone to spoofing. Functional biometrics, such as brain activity, are less prone to attack. That feature has motivated researchers like Jinani Sooriyaarachchi and her colleagues in Australia to develop scalable brain-based authentication systems. In one of their most recent studies, they recruited twenty volunteers and asked them to listen to both a popular English song and their own favorite song while their brain wave activity was recorded with a four-channel (an electrode capturing brain wave activity is called a channel) Muse headset. Afterward, the researchers analyzed their recorded brain wave activity using an artificial-intelligence classifier algorithm. Remarkably, they achieved 98.39 percent accuracy in identifying the correct participant when they listened to the familiar song, and a 99.46 percent accuracy when they listened to their favorite song. Using an eight-channel EEG headset on thirty research subjects, another group achieved a similar 98 percent accuracy in authenticating participants by their brain wave data after they’d looked at novel images. It might not even take eight or even four electrodes to achieve the same result. Even with just a single-channel EEG headset, researchers have achieved 99 percent accuracy in distinguishing between participants when they performed the same mental tasks. Most of these studies had a small number of participants; it is not yet clear if neural signatures will be as accurate at scale, when billions rather than dozens of people must be authenticated. EEG is inherently noisy—meaning the signals the electrodes pick up can come from eye-blinking or other movement, which can make it hard to tell the difference between brain activity or interference. But researchers have made substantial progress in developing pattern classifiers that filter noise, allowing them to discriminate between individuals based on their resting-state EEG brain wave activity and when performing tasks. As noted previously, EEG devices have been used to recover sensitive information from a person’s brain, such as their PIN codes, and their political and religious ideologies. Obviously, this poses clear risks to our digital and physical security.
Governments can already tap our phone conversations and snoop on us digitally. Will they similarly tap our brain activity data without our knowledge or consent? Will they deploy AI programs to search our brains for terrorist plots? Will they gather neural data to make inferences about individuals’ political beliefs to predict and prevent peaceful protests? China is reportedly already doing so.
All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission. All prices are correct at the time of publishing.
HBO’s Succession made its first appearance in Nielsen’s streaming rankings on the heels of its final season premiere.
The Emmy-winning show had 480 million minutes of watch time on HBO Max for the week of March 27-April 2 (it premiered on March 26). The premiere set what was then a first-night ratings record for Succession (since surpassed by other episodes this season), and a sizable portion of the viewing on HBO Max in the following was likely for that episode. Nielsen counts all available episodes of a show in calculating its streaming totals.
Netflix’s The Night Agent spent its second straight week as the No. 1 overall title in the rankings. The espionage thriller grew by about 18 percent over its premiere week to 3.06 billion minutes of viewing, lapping the field. Two other Netflix titles, Love Is Blind (1.24 billion minutes) and the movie Murder Mystery 2 (1.12 billion), also crossed the billion-minute mark. The premiere of Murder Mystery 2, starring Adam Sandler and Jennifer Aniston, also brought its 2019 predecessor back into the movie rankings, where it drew 423 million minutes of viewing.
The Mandalorian improved by about 10 percent week to week for Disney+, rising to 878 million minutes of viewing. Apple TV+’s Ted Lasso (570 million minutes) edged up from 568 million the previous week.
Nielsen’s streaming ratings cover viewing on TV sets only and don’t include minutes watched on computers or mobile devices. The ratings only measure U.S. audiences, not those in other countries. The top streaming titles for March 27-April 2 are below.
Overall
1. The Night Agent (Netflix), 3.06 billion minutes viewed 2. Love Is Blind (Netflix), 1.24 billion 3. Murder Mystery 2 (Netflix), 1.12 billion 4. The Mandalorian (Disney+), 878 million 5. Cocomelon (Netflix), 810 million 6. Bluey (Disney+), 767 million 7. South Park (HBO Max), 757 million 8. NCIS (Netflix/Paramount+), 746 million 9. Grey’s Anatomy (Netflix), 578 million 10. Ted Lasso (Apple TV+), 570 million
Original Series
1. The Night Agent, 3.06 billion minutes 2. Love Is Blind, 1.24 billion 3. The Mandalorian, 878 million 4. Ted Lasso, 570 million 5. Emergency: NYC (Netflix), 545 million 6. Shadow and Bone (Netflix), 519 million 7. Unstable (Netflix), 388 million 8. You (Netflix), 377 million 9. Outer Banks (Netflix), 358 million 10. Waco: American Apocalypse (Netflix), 337 million
Acquired Series
1. Cocomelon, 810 million minutes 2. Bluey, 767 million 3. South Park, 757 million 4. NCIS, 746 million 5. Grey’s Anatomy, 578 million 6. Supernatural (Netflix), 535 million 7. The Big Bang Theory (HBO Max), 501 million 8. Succession (HBO Max), 480 million 9. Friends (HBO Max), 403 million 10. The Walking Dead (Netflix), 384 million
Ruben Broekhuis’s propulsive thriller mixes documentary and found-footage conventions to tell a sinister and unpredictable story about surveillance and the dark web. The film’s narrative disruptions suggest that he and the screenwriter Sarah Offringa are devoted students of Michael Haneke’s “Funny Games.”
Elias (Claudio Gabriel Magaña Torres) explains on camera that he’s making a documentary about a woman named Aisha (Nastaran Razawi Khorasani), who has lived in the Netherlands since the 1990s, when she and her brother, Adin, arrived there from Bosnia as refugees. The young siblings were in a shelter, about to be adopted, when one day Adin mysteriously disappeared.
When Elias and Aisha arrive at the shelter with the camera rolling, blows are exchanged as the administrators question the visitors’ motives. But then — and here’s where the film made me sit straight up — the camera’s point of view switches. Subsequent twists explain why one of my found-footage pet peeves — a score — has so far underlined the action; I won’t say more, to preserve this film’s many sneaky detours. A knockout final stretch explains most everything, but the film concludes with a too-twisty coda.
An Indonesian all-girls reformatory is the setting for Ginanti Rona’s (not too) dark possession thriller, told from the perspective of young Muslim women.
Yolanda (Aghniny Haque), from Jakarta, is sent to the secluded school, where girls study the Quran under a creepy, handsy headmaster, Jaelani (Omar Daniel) — the kind of guy who keeps his exorcism kit at the ready in case a demon inhabits one of his students. In order to graduate, the girls must take part in a ritual in which they’ll meet a human-possessing jinn, or spirit — an unorthodox task that ends with Yolanda and her classmates meeting hungry hell-dwellers on earth.
With “The Pope’s Exorcist” out now and “The Nun 2” on the way, it’s a treat to watch a possession film from a religious perspective other than Christianity, especially one that takes a feminist approach to fighting demons of both supernatural and earthly origin. The cinematography, by Arfian, is a beautiful blend of lush and spooky, particularly during scenes in which students battle unseen assailants.
Jacky Caillou (Thomas Parigi, charming) leads a quiet life in rural France with his grandmother, Gisèle (Edwige Blondiau), a healer who mends aching humans and ailing sheep. One afternoon, Elsa (Lou Lampros) shows up looking to be cured of a crusty stain on her back. All goes well until Gisèle unexpectedly dies and a mourning Jacky tries to heal Elsa with techniques he picked up from his grandmother. (Plus, he’s got it bad for Elsa.) But when Elsa’s body starts to grow fur and farmers wake up to slaughtered sheep, it turns out that human hands are no match for poor Elsa’s supernatural urges.
Lucas Delangle’s film is a refreshingly chill werewolf movie: It is mystical, thoughtfully paced, innocently sexual and only mildly scary, with a script by Delangle and Olivier Strauss that favors coming-of-age tenderness over creature-feature terror.If you were a fan of “Teddy,” that other oddball French drama about a young werewolf, you’ll fall for this film’s charms.
One of my favorite “Twilight Zone” episodes is “To Serve Man,” about aliens who bring about peace on Earth but leave behind a book that doesn’t belong on any human interest shelf. A similar twist lives inside the title of Peter Hengl’s macabre slow-burn drama about a shy German teenager’s rocky entry into adulthood.
The film opens as Simi (Nina Katlein) arrives for an Easter weekend visit with her aunt Claudia (Pia Hierzegger), a wellness author writing a book about ancient food cultures, and Claudia’s husband, Stefan (Michael Pink). Weirdness abounds: Neither Claudia nor Stefan eat much, and Simi’s cousin Filipp (Alexander Sladek), when he’s not mocking Simi for being a “fat cow,” is convinced his mother is out to kill him. All this leaves Simi wondering where her allegiances belong — until she gets an answer, of a diabolical sort, when Easter dinner is served.
Hengl’s script sets an eerie mood that’s more of a stroll than a race, even though its thematic concerns — immortality, bullying, body shame — are ripe with face-punching possibilities. As in the recent film “Piggy,” it’s nice to see a leading young female character who’s not a size 2, but I’m ready for Katlein to lead a scary movie that’s not about the horrors of body shaming.
Irina (Greta Bohacek) and her younger brother, Paul (Claude Heinrich), work in a Dickensian factory atop a lush Greek island making holy soap under the orders of their guru, the dapper Fust (Sam Louwyck). The bars are used in erotic cleansing rituals that Fust believes keep his disciples physically pure.
When Fust asks Irina to move into the adults’ house, she — like any teenager eager to feel grown — agrees, leaving Paul to seethe at his sister’s selfishness. When Paul’s pet pig, Stinky, is killed, it’s the final straw that sets him on a vengeful mission to reclaim not only the sister he loves, but his dignity as a human and a laborer. “Without dirt, there’s no soap,” he tells himself, like a good little Marxist.
The director Nikias Chryssos and the cinematographer Yoshi Heimrath made a disturbing and ambitiously maximalist dark-comedy parable about faith and fanaticism. (It’s in German and Greek.) The story loses focus as it detours through a convoluted plot about a passion play, and farcical moments, like a shining crotch, undercut its sinister edges. Still, if it’s extra you want, I say dive in.
Late Night With Seth Meyers has been on a roll lately including landing Meyers his first Primetime Emmy nomination last year in the TV Talk Show category. It wasn’t his first dance with Emmy, as he now has a total of 29 nominations including several for writing (including a win for co-penning a Saturday Night Live song), but now has moved clearly into the big leagues.
Even a year later, Meyers couldn’t hide his pleasure after his NBC late-night series finally landed its first Emmy nom in that lineup.
“I mean, I kept saying to people, I’m embarrassed how happy it made me mostly because I’d spent so many years saying you know, this stuff doesn’t really matter,” he said during a panel conversation at Deadline’s Contenders Television: Documentary + Unscripted event. “Then you give it perspective, but you know, I have so much respect for the other people in the category and the category itself. And, you know, for us, it was the first time our producing team got one, and they have so much to do with the quality of these shows. It was a really cool thing to share with them.”
Meyers is dealing with the changing landscape of late-night and now, after the exit earlier in the week of James Corden from the time sector. Late Night remains the only traditional network talk show (at the moment at least) in the late-late-night game. He enjoys it.
“I love getting to do it every day. You know, I did those SNL years where you’re aiming for one show a week and that makes you really tense because you realize you only have one chance to get it right,” he said. “It’s fun to have a show every evening where you get to be a little bit looser with it. You don’t live and die with every monologue joke. I mean, probably a year into doing late-night I told more monologue jokes than the entirety of my years behind the Weekend Update desk.
“I think when you’re doing a show, especially like mine at 12:37 at night, people want to watch a host who’s relaxed who’s not living and dying with every punch line and that’s what the amount of shows we get to do provides.”
The Night of the Hunter (1955) Trailer – The Criterion Collection
Available May 30
Robert Mitchum plays a serial killer who presents himself as a preacher to charm a widow (Shelley Winters) and get his hands on $10,000 of loot stolen by her executed husband in The Night Of The Hunter, a classic film noir directed by Charles Laughton. For the movie’s 4K UHD debut, Kino Lorber has done a 4K restoration of the film from the original camera negative. Extras include an audio commentary by novelist and critic Tim Lucas, an isolated music and effects soundtrack, interviews, the theatrical trailer, and more.
If you’ve been keeping up with world weirdness, you may have heard the recent theory that Mark David Chapman did not assassinate John Lennon. Just as with JFK in 1963, Lennon was shot not in the back but in the front by a second gunman.
Yes, Chapman admitted to shooting Lennon outside the Dakota on the evening of Dec. 8, 1980. There were witnesses. Yoko knows Chapman killed her husband. Case closed, right?
Story continues below advertisement
Not according to British author David Whelan. He’s spent the last three years investigating Lennon’s murder and has come to the conclusion that someone other than Chapman is responsible and will lay everything out in an upcoming documentary and book entitled Gimme Some Truth: The Assassination of John Lennon. Here are the basics.
A doctor and a couple of nurses who saw Lennon in the ER of the Roosevelt Hospital allegedly believe that Lennon’s wounds were consistent with someone shot from the front, not from behind, which is where Chapman was.
He was 25 feet away when he pulled the trigger. That’s a sizeable distance for an untrained gunman using a short-barreled .38 calibre pistol. The four bullets that hit Lennon were tightly clustered, evidence that an expert pulled the trigger.
The hollow-point bullets in Chapman’s gun should have caused far more tissue damage than was noted. Then again, the medical examiner (a guy dogged by controversy) never released the results of the autopsy.
And while Chapman insists he was the assassin, he’s apparently mistaken. The theory says that he was a sleeper agent, brainwashed by someone (the CIA?) to believe he was the killer. Like Lee Harvey Oswald, he was made the patsy in a professional hit.
So many questions. Why would the CIA want Lennon, a semi-retired rock star, dead? Why would these forces choose Chapman? Where, exactly, was this second gunman perched? Lennon was right behind Yoko as the two entered the building. What about the witness corroborations?
Insane stuff, really, but this is just one of many alleged conspiracies to be found throughout the history of music. Here are some of my favourites.
Story continues below advertisement
311’s KKK Problem
Omaha’s 311 has been dogged by rumours that their name is a veiled reference to the Ku Klux Klan? How? “K” is the eleventh letter of the alphabet, ergo 3 x K = KKK. This story was once so rampant that some schools banned the wearing of 311 T-shirts on campus. None of this is true. The band says that “311” is actually Omaha police code for “indecent exposure.”
And while we’re at it, “KISS” does not stand for “Knights in Satan’s Service.”
The KGB invented punk to destabilize the UK
Adherents to this theory believe that the Sex Pistols (among others) were scripted by Soviet agents in hopes of destroying British society from within. A major source for this conspiracy was a retired KGB agent named Alexandrov Varennikov Volishin who claimed that the entire punk movement, from the Ramones to the Sex Pistols to the Clash, was financed by shadowy Soviet forces. The goal, he said, was to “create utter chaos” and to “pervert the Western youth to nihilist, anti-establishment, and anti-American ideologies.”
Volishin also claimed that many punk songs were written by teams of propagandists and psychologists to promote revolutionary thinking, increase cynicism, and encourage heavy drug use.
“Our mission was to use teenage angst to our advantage and turn the baby boomer generation of the West into a decadent, pro-drug and anti-establishment culture that would create uprisings and bring Western democracies into utter chaos,” Volishin said.
Story continues below advertisement
“We even infiltrated mainstream radios to promote their music and reach millions of people every day. For many of us in the KGB, infiltrating the 1970s punk scene was one of the USSR’s most successful experiments of propaganda to date.”
This testimony has been completely and utterly debunked. The origin of the claims was a website called World News Daily Report which specialized in satire and fake news. They made it all up, but every once in a while, the story makes the rounds on social media.
On a related note, some believe that the Britpop of the 1990s was pushed by MI5 to distract youth from pressing domestic issues. Tony Blair was a fan. Case closed.
The CIA wrote Wind of Change to destabilize the Soviet Bloc
Wind of Change is The Scorpions’ biggest hit, selling somewhere around 14 million copies after it was released in January 1991. Driving sales was the song’s popularity in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Singer Klaus Meine wrote it after the Scorps participated in the Moscow Music Peace Festival in the summer of 1989.
The lyrics, “I follow the Moskva / Down to Gorky Park / Listening to the wind of change,” resonated with the glasnost-loving citizens. The band even presented Mikhail Gorbachev with his own gold record.
For years, rumour swirled that the song was a plant, a CIA construction to promote change and revolution in the Eastern Bloc. The notions of freedom contained in the song swept the region, leading to the dissolution of the Soviet Union and most of its satellite authoritarian regimes. It worked so well that by the end of 1991, the USSR was no more and the Iron Curtain had crumbled. Nice, one CIA.
Story continues below advertisement
If you want to explore this rabbit hole, there’s an entire podcast series designed to get to the bottom of this conspiracy. (SPOILER: Klaus Meine wrote it on his own.)
Tom DeLonge’s alien coverup by Governments
Given the U.S. Government’s recent transparency about UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon), Tom may actually be onto something. He’s convinced that someone or something is surveilling the human race using technology (e.g. “zero point energy“) far beyond our capabilities. Tom also claims the following: He experienced “lost time” while camping out near Area 51 in the Nevada desert; the moon landing was real but we’re not being told about what NASA really found up there; and something about fossilized remains being found on Mars.
Story continues below advertisement
Although he’s back with blink-182 now, it’s said that his deep interest in the UAP thing caused the riff that resulted in him leaving the band. While estranged, he co-wrote several books, both fiction and non-fiction, on the subject. (I’ve read them all and they’re quite good. Search for “Sekret Machines” on any online bookstore and you’ll find them.) There was a History Channel series called Inside America’s UFO Investigation that I quite enjoyed. Finally, there’s Tom’s To the Stars Academy, an institution loaded with academics from NASA, the CIA, and the White House that wants to know the truth about what’s going on.
Let’s leave things with this song Tom wrote for blink-182. Keep watching the skies!
—
Story continues below advertisement
Alan Cross is a broadcaster with Q107 and 102.1 the Edge and a commentator for Global News.
Snap, still wrestling with an unpredictable advertising environment, reported first-quarter 2023 revenue that slightly undershot Wall Street expectations even as Snapchat’s user growth continued upward. The company said was not providing formal guidance for revenue or adjusted earnings for the second quarter of 2023.
The Snapchat parent company’s Q1 revenue was $989 million, a decline of 7%. It posted a net loss of $329 million (versus $360 million in the year-earlier quarter), translating to an adjusted net loss of 1 cent per share.
Shares of Snap dropped more than 19% in after-hours trading on the results. Wall Street analysts on average expected $1.01 billion in revenue and an adjusted loss of 1 cent per share, according to Refinitiv. Snap had previously told investors Q1 revenue could be down as much as 10% in the period.
Snapchat’s daily active user base rose about 8 million in the period, to an average of 383 million DAUs worldwide (up 15% from the year earlier), in line with expectations.
“We are working to accelerate our revenue growth and we are using this opportunity to make significant improvements to our advertising platform to help drive increased return on investment for our advertising partners,” Snap CEO and co-founder Evan Spiegel said in prepared remarks.
Advertising demand in Q1 was “disrupted by the changes we made to our ad platform to drive more click-through conversions, and as advertisers adapt their measurement solutions to these new objectives,” Snap said in its Q1 shareholder letter. “While these changes are disruptive in the short term, we are optimistic that our ad platform improvements are laying the foundation for future growth.”
But in the near term, Snap faces ongoing issues on the revenue front. In the second quarter, the company said, “we expect to face continued disruption in demand related to the advertising platform changes initiated early in Q1. While many of our most sophisticated advertisers have already begun to navigate these changes and resume growth in their spend with us, we anticipate that it will take time for some of our advertisers to fully recover and for our models to become better tuned to their new objectives.” It added that “we have some concern that advertisers who rely on backward-looking signals, such as lift studies, may have a delayed reaction to the changes made in early Q1 that could impact their advertising spending in Q2.”
Last week at the Snap Partner Summit, the company announced that Snapchat+, the subscription service that offers exclusive, experimental and prerelease features, reached more than 3 million paying subscribers in Q1. In addition, it launched My AI, an AI-powered chatbot to all Snapchat users (after it was previously restricted to Snapchat+ customers) designed to “surface the best of Snapchat to our community” including augmented-reality Lenses and recommendations from the Snap Mapt.
Barry Walsh is editor-in-chief and content director for Realscreen, and has served as editor of the publication since 2009. With a career in entertainment media that spans two decades, prior to Realscreen, he held the associate editor post for now defunct sister publication Boards, which focused on the advertising and commercial production industries. Before Boards, he served as editor of Canadian Music Network, a weekly music industry trade, and as music editor for HMV.com. As content director, he also oversees the development of content for the brand’s market-leading events, the Realscreen Summit and Realscreen West, as well as new content initiatives.
Ameesha Patel will be making her comeback to cinemas with Gadar 2 opposite Sunny Deol.
Ameesha Patel recently expressed her desire to work with Tom Cruise. During a red carpet event, the actress was asked if she could switch places with another actor, who would it be. Responding to the same, she said that she would like to switch places with any actress who has had the chance to star opposite Tom Cruise in films.
The actress confessed that she is a huge fan of the actor and that if given a chance she would have married him if she could. She also revealed that during her growing up years, she had
posters of the Hollywood star in her room. Ameesha recently graced the red carpet of the Filmfare Awards.
Meanwhile on the work front, Ameesha is all set to make a comeback to cinemas with Gadar 2: The Katha Continues. Helmed by Anil Sharma, the highly anticipated romantic period drama is all set to hit the theatres on August 11, 2023.
Earlier, in an interview with Hindustan Times, the actress shared, “It feels wonderful to be back on such a historic film. Actually, it is surreal to get back to play the character of Sakina along with Tara Singh (Sunny Deol). It doesn’t seem like 20 years to me. Sakina is part of my blood, so getting into the skin of the character didn’t require any effort. She is so lovable and pure. Even while doing Gadar, I felt that she is an extension of me, so it is very simple for me”.
She added, “I’m fortunate because it is very rare when an actor gets a chance to revisit a super successful character. The characters of Gadar are still etched on everyone’s mind, and now people want to see what happens to this family again”.
When asked what to expect from the upcoming film, the actress had shared, “It will be a visual delight for the audience because people are not going to realise that it has been a gap of 20 years. The film will come with great music, drama, comedy, dialogues, where one can expect cheers, claps and seetis. The cinema which was missing for so long, will be recreated with Gadar coming back onto the big screen.”
Aditi Giri, Senior Sub-Editor at News18. She is a Bollywood and Biryani enthusiast. She loves talking to your favourite BTown celebrities, and brings …Read More
Now in its fourth weekend of release, “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” is still dominating the competition on domestic charts, fending off theatrical newcomers “Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret,” “Sisu” and “Big George Foreman.”
The adaptation of Judy Blume’s best-selling 1970 novel is faring the best among new releases. Opening in 3,343 locations, the coming-of-age film earned $2.25 million on Friday, a figure that includes roughly $600,000 in Thursday previews. That may be enough for the Lionsgate release to project a third place finish for the weekend, but it’s ultimately an underwhelming result for a crowdpleaser based on a literary mainstay that carries a $30 million production budget.
That’s not to say support isn’t there for “Margaret.” The film has earned glowing reviews, landing a 98% approval rating from top critics on aggregate website Rotten Tomatoes. Audiences are also a big thumbs-up, as research firm Cinema Score drew an “A” grade after surveying the first round of ticket buyers.
Lionsgate will look to make the most of that word-of-mouth, as “Margaret” continues to play through the upcoming Mother’s Day weekend. Beyond theatrical, the distributor can hope that the coming-of-age tale finds a shelf life as enduring as its source material’s.
Directed by Kelly Fremon Craig, “Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret” stars Abby Ryder Fortson, Rachel McAdams and Kathy Bates. As in the original book, the film follows sixth-grader Margaret Simon, who finds herself suddenly transplanted to the suburbs of New Jersey while wrestling with puberty and her religious identity.
“The Super Mario Bros. Movie” is still towering over its competitors. The animated adventure is putting up yet another impressive hold, projecting a slim 37% drop from its previous outing for a hearty $37.5 million weekend gross. Already the highest-grossing release of 2023 so far, the film will almost certainly cross the $1 billion mark at the global box office this weekend. It’ll be the fifth title to notch that achievement since the onset of the global COVID pandemic, following in the footsteps of “Spider-Man: No Way Home,” “Top Gun: Maverick,” “Jurassic World Dominion” and “Avatar: The Way of Water.”
“Evil Dead Rise” looks to take silver after grossing $3.6 million on Friday, down 65% from its opening day last week. The nutty horror sequel looks to expand its total domestic gross to $43 million this weekend. It’s a rewarding run for the film, which carries a $19 million production budget and was initially slated to debut exclusively on HBO Max. But Warner Bros. shifted to a theatrical rollout and now looks to be rewarded in substantial ticket sales.
“John Wick: Chapter 4” continues to show staying power, looking to stick at fourth place on domestic charts. The Keanu Reeves action epic drew $1.2 million on Friday, down only 21% from a week ago. Total domestic gross should surpass $175 million through the weekend. With $373 globally, the “John Wick” entry is the third-highest grossing release of the year, behind “Super Mario Bros.” and “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania.”
It’s clear that it’s somewhat of a quiet weekend at the box office when a film from 1983 is ranking in the top five. Disney is re-releasing “Return of the Jedi” this weekend to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the “Star Wars” trilogy capper. Playing in 475 theaters, the classic earned $1.75 million on Friday.
Also dropping stateside this weekend, the Indian epic “Ponniyin Selvan: Part Two” looks to land in the top 10 on domestic charts, projecting a haul around $3 million to $4 million. “Part One” opened to $4 million when it debuted last fall.
“Sisu,” a quirky Finnish action film being opened by Lionsgate, drew $1.4 million on Friday from 1,006 locations. The distributor fashioned a targeted marketing campaign and has looked to make a buzzy title among genre audiences after acquiring the title out of the Toronto International Film Festival.
The newly released George Foreman biopic, fully titled “Big George Foreman: The Miraculous Story of the Once and Future Heavyweight Champion of the World,” will likely open outside of the top 10. Distributed by Sony’s Affirm Films banner, the title is projecting a $2.8 million debut.
This week, the Scarlet Witch says she’s done with Marvel, audiences react to Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, and Fantastic Four rumors heat up.
Let’s talk about the impending changing of the guard in the latest MarvelBlog News.
The Guardians Have Arrived
Source: Marvel
This past week was a busy one for Marvel. The studio’s next big project screened for the first time.
During the red carpet premiere in Paris, a carefully selected group of journalists watched the film and commented afterward.
Marvel has learned to orchestrate these events to maximize early word-of-mouth, even on mediocre projects.
Photo: Marvel
For this reason, you shouldn’t get too excited about the glowing reviews. After all, if these critics provide harsh assessments, they don’t get invited back.
Still, fans should feel some cautious optimism with Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3. The early reviews suggest that it’s an ideal conclusion to the trilogy.
Several critics note the similarities to the Star Wars Holy Trilogy, albeit told as more of a comedy.
Source: @Jamesgunn
Since several stars have suggested that they won’t return to MCU, this film feels finite in more ways than one.
Thankfully, early reviews indicate that each of the characters, including Gamora and Drax, finish strong.
That’s important because Dave Bautista already said he was done with Marvel…MANY times. This past week, Zoe Saldana said the same.
Source: Marvel Studios
That’s an understandable decision by her since she has Avatar 2 money to spend. But it’s sad to Marvel fans nonetheless.
As we’ll discuss more in the next section, the first wave of female Avengers all seem to be leaving.
Since the audience is so invested in the Guardians characters by now, anything other than a fitting conclusion would break our hearts.
Source: Marvel Studios
While we won’t know for a while how the unbiased reviews are, the early ones suggest a fitting sendoff for Peter Quill and his alien friends.
Also, there’s an uncensored F-bomb in the movie. It’s important to director James Gunn that you know that.
Where Have All the Female Avengers Gone?
Last week, Scarlett Johansson confirmed that she has finished her work in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) and is unlikely to return.
That’s no surprise to anyone who has kept up with Johansson’s recent history with Marvel’s parent company, The Walt Disney Company.
Disney’s then-CEO, Bob Chapek, famously tried to shortchange Johansson of expected earnings for Black Widow.
Kathryn Hahn and Elizabeth Olsen. Photo: @jrvsscarlet
After the actress complained, Chapek inexplicably attacked her, accusing her of being greedy during the pandemic, a time of austerity.
Johansson sued, Disney backed down, and the actress gained what is reported to be a $20+ million paycheck. Some reports had it as high as $40 million.
Photo: Marvel Studios
Still, Johansson doesn’t need more money at this point. A miserable experience and a personal attack were more than enough to sour her on future Disney-related projects.
Johansson discussed this during an interview with Gwyneth Paltrow, another Marvel performer.
Photo: Polygon
Notably, Paltrow indicated she probably would return if Marvel asked. Of course, Paltrow’s notoriously flaky.
The actress didn’t even know she appeared in Spider-Man: Homecoming. Seriously:
Paltrow doesn’t view her work in the MCU negatively, nor does another actress, Elizabeth Olsen.
During a recent interview, Olsen described herself as “unemployed” and said of her time at Marvel, “I don’t miss it.”
As a reminder, Marvel has scheduled three different de facto sequels to WandaVision. There’s a movie, The Marvels, plus two television series.
Photo: Marvel Studios
Those programs are Vision Quest and Agatha: Coven of Chaos. Marvel had hoped that Olsen would appear in at least one of them, if not all.
The only hope I can offer here is a gentle reminder. Paul Bettany once said it was a dream to work with a certain actor on WandaVision.
That person proved to be…himself. Maybe Olsen is pranking us, too? At least there’s this:
Fantastic Casting Underway
Source: Marvel
Okay, longtime readers have heard this song before, but here we go again.
Once again, Marvel is allegedly making forward progress in casting the long-promised Fantastic Four film.
Marvel revealed this title during its Phase Four/Five announcement, but here we are several films later without any forward progress.
Source: Marvel
Disney recently hired Matt Shakman as director and provided him with some control over the casting.
At this point, Marvel basically started over again with its hiring process, thereby negating some of the previous casting rumors.
They were certainly based in truth at the time, but the presence of a new director ended those possibilities.
Source: Marvel
Now, we’re learning more about who could join the project, and one of the names will sound familiar.
Yes, Adam Driver remains a strong possibility. He’d previously been rumored to play either Doctor Door or perhaps even Reed Richards.
The conventional wisdom has him playing Reed Richards and leading Marvel’s First Family now. I maintain that he’d make a much better Doctor Doom.
Source: Marvel Studios
In fact, Kylo Ren is really just a sci-fi spin on the gloomy Doctor Doom anyway.
Still, the more perplexing rumors involve Sue Storm-Richards, Reed’s wife.
Marvel
In a “They can’t possibly be serious” instance, Marvel has vetted Mila Kunis (!) for the role. Also, Vanessa Kirby of The Son is on the shortlist.
The most logical candidate remains a possibility as well. That’s Jodie Comer of Killing Eve.
So, Marvel has good choices here and some genuinely strange ones. Let’s hope they pick well.
Marvel Miscellany
Source: Marvel/Hot Toys
Thankfully, this week was calmer after the previous week’s nonsense.
We did have a few interesting tidbits, though. As I mentioned last week, several of Sony’s Spider-Man movies are now available on Disney+.
Here’s a funny addition. Venom will arrive on the service on May 12th.
That’s the longest gap we’ve had between the theatrical release of a Marvel movie and its Disney+ debut since before the pandemic.
Realistically, this is probably the pattern we should expect from now on as well.
Credit: Marvel
Disney would like to restore the exclusivity window to earn more revenue via box office and VOD services.
The shorter wait time for Disney+ diminishes that earning potential.
Thanks for visiting MarvelBlog.com! Want to go to Disney? For a FREE quote on your next Disney vacation, please fill out the form below, and one of the agents from MickeyTravels, a Diamond-Level Authorized Disney Vacation Planner, will be in touch soon!
Jason Momoa has been doing good things on Apple TV+ with his series See, and his new show for the streamer is set to be just as big. However, Chief of War is something different for the Hawaiian actor, as it is a very personal project that allows him to delve into the history of his own people, something that he has called challenging, hard but above all, his “Holy Grail.”
While Momoa has become best known for his big blockbuster roles, which will be on display again this year with Fast X and Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom, the actor has often dipped his toe into TV work as well. His latest small screen role is by far the most important that he has ever been part of. He told Men’s Health:
“[It’s my] Holy Grail, my baby, and my dream. It’s like my Braveheart or Dances with Wolves. I never thought it would be this big. It’s the hardest, most challenging, most demanding thing I’ve ever done. It’s the last big dream I have left. Everything else is just kind of ‘actor for hire,’ but this is my homage to my people. We have so many beautiful stories in Hawaii that no one knows about. All I care about is just doing right by my people. [The show is] for Indigenous kids growing up, understanding that we were warriors and what we come from and understanding there was a language that was stripped from us. Like most Indigenous tribes, everything’s taken from us. It’s like rebuilding and building these bridges back.”
While it is easy for actors to claim that one project or another is the greatest or most personal thing they have done, Momoa has taken it to the next level with Chief of War. As well as staring in the eight part series, he also acts as writer and producer on the show.
Momoa plays Ka’iana, one of the first natives of Hawaii to visit the U.S. and China in the late 18th century. The series will be exploring how Ka’iana traveled the world, learning about his own island home and leading to the unification of Hawaii. Momoa is joined in the series by Temuera Morrison, best known recently for playing Star Wars’ Boba Fett, Luciane Buchanan and Karina Makua.
There has currently been no release date set for Chief of War to air on Apple TV+, but with filming having been mostly completed in late 2022 and earlier 2023, there is a good chance that the series will be arriving sometime later this year. It will be another addition to the growing roster of work by Momoa, which as well as his Aquaman sequel and Fast X appearance also includes a live-action Minecraft movie and a remake of the Sylvester Stallone thriller Cliffhanger, both of which are currently in pre-production. With all of this, and the all-but-confirmed belief that Momoa will be taking on the role of Lobos in the new DCU, there are many things for his fans to look forward to in the future.
Respawn CEO Vince Zampella has said that he’d “love to see” Titanfall 3 happen, although he stopped short of committing to a return to the franchise.
Speaking to Barron’s, Zampella claimed that Respawn is “not working on anything currently.”
He said: “I hate to say yes, then people latch onto that, and then skewer you when it doesn’t come. But I would love to see it happen is the real answer. There are no exact dedicated plans for that.”
Titanfall | Official Gameplay Launch Trailer
Zampella continued: “It has to be the right thing. It’s such a beloved franchise for the fans and also for us. If it is not the right moment in time, the right idea, then it just doesn’t make sense.
“Apex [Legends] is the Titanfall universe, right? There’s how do you do something that doesn’t confuse people that are Apex fans, but not necessarily Titanfall fans yet. It’s a hard question to answer, but ultimately I would love to see something.”
This single-player experience for Apex Legends would have been an attempt at getting a “Titanfall-feeling project” inside of its hugely popular free-to-player spin-off, Apex Legends, according to Giant Bomb reporter Jeff Grubb.
“Titanfall Legends was not Titanfall 3, because in a lot of people’s minds I think Titanfall 3 was going to be a new, standalone game with a single-player campaign and a multiplayer, and they could just never do that again after Apex Legends changed the calculus on all of those things,” he said.
EA internally announced the cancellation of the game in February, it’s claimed.
Beau Is Afraid actor Armen Nahapetian has made the announcement that he is indeed not a work of artificial intelligence.
Beau may be afraid, but actor Armen Nahapetian is more concerned that you think he is a work of artificial intelligence. The Beau Is Afraid co-star, who plays the teenage version of Joaquin Phoenix’s character, recently updated his Instagram profile bio to read, “I’m not AI”…which most actors generally don’t have to explain.
Yet, Armen Nahapetian has been the subject of just that, facing accusations that he’s actually a digitally created entity and not flesh, bones and DNA, telling Variety that the Instagram update is “half joking, but half being serious…I thought people would eventually realize that, you know, I’m a real boy.” But this hasn’t been the case even after stepping out for the premiere of Beau Is Afraid, as he has continued to face skepticism. “I went to the movie theater a few weeks ago, and one of the employees was pointing at the poster saying, ‘Oh, my God, you’re real!’” So, would they have made him pay for the ticket with NFTs…?
This questioning of Armen Nahapetian’s identity began long before Beau Is Afraid even came out. Once the bizarre posters hit the internet, people immediately began wondering, What is up with the kid on the poster? Certainly there is a juxtaposition there, with Nahapetian appearing sort of…well, artificial, at least compared to the three Joaquin Phoenix versions also depicted. Indeed, many just assumed it was a digitally de-aged Phoenix. It didn’t help, either, that one poster even had an image of Armen Nahapetian with “JOAQUIN PHOENIX” above. In fairness, Nahapetian does look at least a little bit like a young Joaquin Phoenix in the face (see: 1988’s Parenthood).
Armen Nahapetian’s existence has only added to Beau Is Afraid’s release–after all, it is definitely an epic and trippy movie–with the curiosity translating into respectable box office numbers, with the A24 film taking in $80,000 per screen, which is actually the best average of 2023. So suck on that, computer-generated Mario!
Do you think Armen Nahapetian looks like an A.I. work? Did you think he was a digitally de-aged Joaquin Phoenix? Let us know below!
Sunny Hostin is reacting to the fiery column former The View co-host Meghan McCain posted airing out her grievances from her time on the daytime talk show.
While promoting her new book Summer on the Bluffs: A Novel on Bravo’s Watch What Happens Live, a fan asked Hostin for her thoughts on McCain’s column.
“Oh, let me take a drink. Um, what can I say? I have not read the column. I have heard about it, and our show is a wonderful place,” Hostin said. “We’re the No. 1 talk show in the country, I’m happy to say. I’m surprised that she’s writing about the book.”
She continued, “I know her husband [Ben Domenech] likes to mean-tweet about me, which is shocking, but Meghan and I have always been friendly, we remain friends, and I don’t think she’s doing television anymore.”
Hostin went on to suggest McCain for one of the franchises of The Real Housewives telling host Andy Cohen to hire her for The Real Housewives of Potomac “or any of them.”
“I wish her well,” Hostin added. “We’re really happy on the show, we’re really a cohesive group, and, God bless!”
Watch Hostin on WWHL in the video below.
Cohen is an executive producer on The Real Housewives franchise. McCain has openly talked about what a fan she is of the format and often takes to Twitter to debate about the Bravo shows.
“The only way to survive on that show is to be vanilla pudding. Say nothing controversial with the elites, bow down, and don’t actually do the job you were hired to do, which is voice your authentic opinions,” McCain wrote in her column.
I have a confession to make. Even though I’m the kind of guy who likes high art stuff like August Wilson plays, and classic cinema, I also really love talk shows. The trashier, the better.
So, my whole mood nosedived when I heard the news that the talk show legend, Jerry Springer, recently passed away. Because, even though I’ve spent a lot of my life loving the talk show medium, both late night and day time, The Jerry Springer Show was always my favorite, and I have five reasons why. Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!
(Image credit: NBCUniversal Television Distribution)
Everybody I Knew Watched Jerry Springer, So We Always Talked About Our Favorite Episodes
As I mentioned in the intro, I’ve spent a lot of time watching talk shows. And, as a ’90s kid, a lot of that time was watching the likes of Ricki Lake, Richard Bey, Jenny Jones, etc. But, while some of my back-in-the-day friends watched Jones and others, ALL of my friends watched Jerry Springer. And, how could we not?
The Jerry Springer Show was a three ring circus. So-in-so slept with so-in-so’s man, and guess what. She’s backstage!
Back in school, my friends and I would talk endlessly about certain episodes, especially the ones with love triangles that involved sisters sharing one man, or the episodes where girlfriends would reveal that they were secretly strippers, and would then flash the crowd while going, “Whooooo!”
Should we have been watching any of this at such young, impressionable ages? Probably not. But, we also probably shouldn’t have been watching the Attitude Era, and we all did. The point is, everybody I knew watched Jerry, and that’s why it was so special. It was a communal thing.
(Image credit: NBCUniversal Television Distribution)
It Was Never Boring
Nowadays, I can respect shows like The Oprah Winfrey Show, or The Phil Donahue Show for their choices to take the high road rather than to roll around in the dirt with their tabloid cousins. But, back then, when all I wanted to see was women take off their earrings before they got ready to rumble, I wasn’t watching any of that “garbage” like Donahue, since it was boring, and The Jerry Springer Show was anything but boring.
In fact, I would literally throw a bag of popcorn in the microwave during commercial breaks, only to return with a Surge and a piping hot bag of buttery goodness when the commercials ended. Because, like I said before, his show was a circus, and I was always immensely entertained.
The best part of this, though, was always the juxtaposition of Springer to the madness, as he was either feigning equanimity, or was secretly a Zen master, because he would often just stand there while his security crew would break up the chaos right in front of him. I swear, I’m kicking myself now. I was in Chicago one summer for a journalism fellowship, and I should have gotten tickets for the show when it was still there. But, oh well. I guess I’ll always have reruns.
(Image credit: NBCUniversal Television Distribution)
It Was A Regular “Sick From School” Program
A lot of times, when I was “sick” and couldn’t go to school, I’d have movie marathons where I’d watch Indiana Jones flicks like Raiders, The Temple of Doom, and The Last Crusade, or so-bad-they’re-good movies like Mortal Kombat, and Street Fighter. But, in-between those movie marathons, I’d also find the time to watch Jerry, since it always just fit in so perfectly with my day playing hooky, er, I mean, my sick day.
The nagging thing about talk shows, especially when I was a kid, was that they were typically on WHILE you were at school (so annoying). Sure, I could watch talk shows all day – and often did – during the summer, in between gaming sessions of Star Fox 64 and Body Harvest. But, it just felt so much better watching the show while my friends were toiling away on some essay at school. Ah, memories.
(Image credit: NBCUniversal Television Distribution)
Jerry Actually Had Earnest And Important Life Lessons At The End In His Final Thoughts Segment
In all seriousness, even though we all came for the brawls, bastard husbands, and baby mamas, I think what I might have loved most of all about The Jerry Springer Show was that it didn’t just end in some explosion of fists and feet, but rather, on a quiet note, as Jerry would always go over the madness we had all just seen, and then discuss why we should all still just get along.
Yes, it was always a bit comical at the end of each episode, because, like, you know, he didn’t HAVE to have such guests on his show. But, at the same time, his final thought was always earnest, and you never got a sense that he was actually making fun of his guests. You definitely get a sense of this when Springer gave a Final Thought after being on the air for 25 seasons of his show.
Honestly, when I think back to his talk show from now on, it’s not going to be the fights that I remember most, but rather, Jerry’s Final Thought, which brings me to my last point about why Jerry was, and likely always will be, my favorite talk show.
(Image credit: NBCUniversal Television Distribution)
Jerry Just Seemed Like A Really Nice And Caring Guy
Sure, I know everybody likes to mimic Oprah and go, “You get a car! You get a car! You get a car! You get a car!” and so on. But, while I’m sure Oprah is probably a really caring and empathetic person, she’s always just kind of felt a little fake to me. I know, I know. Heresy, right? How DARE I criticize Oprah? That said, I think my assumption about Oprah says a lot more about me than it ever could about her. Again, I never really gave Oprah a shot, because like I said earlier, her show always looked really boring to me when I was younger.
But, I did watch Jerry Springer, and even though his show was insane, I also think that the man himself was always genuine and had his heart in the right place. Studies once came out that showed that many people considered The Jerry Springer Show one of the most offensive TV shows of all time, and yeah, I get that. At the same time, though, I kind of feel like that perspective came from people who weren’t regular watchers of his show and just saw the fights and heard all of the bleeped cursing. Because at its heart, The Jerry Springer Show was a show about people, and he seemed like somebody who just wanted to give said people a voice.
Not in a malicious way, but as somebody who just let them speak (and often fight), and then offered his own opinion on the matter afterward.
And, with that, all I have left to say is that we’ll all miss you, Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!…rest easy.
In Hollywood history, no Oscar-winning couple has earned greater admiration than Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward. The actors who were married for 50 years before Newman’s death in 2008 are the subject of the six-part CNN Films/HBO Max documentary series The Last Movie Stars, directed by Ethan Hawke, himself a four-time Oscar nominee.
“I’ve dedicated my life to this profession, and they are kind of the high-water mark of what can be achieved,” Hawke said as he appeared along with his filmmaking team at Deadline’s Contenders Television: Documentary + Unscripted event. “A lot of the stories of great artists — a lot of them end tragically. So it was really fun to study two people who continued to develop, and they became better at their craft and became better citizens and better parents.”
The Woodward-Newman love affair was not uncomplicated. When they first met and fell passionately for each other, Newman was still married to his first wife, with whom he had three children.
“That’s part of what’s so interesting about the two of them,” noted producer Adam Gibbs. “It’s not a fairy-tale love story necessarily, but it’s still really a beautiful, long marriage despite whatever bumps along the way there were.”
Early in their relationship, Woodward was the bigger star, and she won the Academy Award in 1958 for her lead performance in The Three Faces of Eve. He first was nominated in 1959 for Cat on a Hot Tin Roof but didn’t win a competitive Oscar until 1987 with The Color of Money. She stepped back from moviemaking for many years to raise her three children with Newman and her three stepchildren.
“She was a magical mother,” said producer Emily Wachtel. “She knit sweaters for everyone. She treated everybody the same. And if you were in her presence, you felt like you were the only person in the room.”
In the series, Newman describes his upbringing as emotionally constricted, and he was expected to go into his father’s sporting goods business. But after serving in World War II, he lit out for New York to study at the Actors Studio alongside Marlon Brando, James Dean, Marilyn Monroe and other future stars. He felt he lacked the spark of eccentricity possessed by some of his classmates but made up for that with what he called the “Newman luck.”
Today, the Newman-Woodward legacy extends well beyond Hollywood into philanthropy. Newman’s Own, the successful food and beverage company, donates 100 percent of its profits to charity.
“He let himself be made fun of for being on spaghetti sauce and salad dressing,” Hawke said. “So many people are so obsessed with preserving how they come across, what their brand is. He betrayed his complete brand, but he did it in the service of others.”
“Any time I’m gonna talk about or even reference another artist, I feel inclined to tell you that if they’re not here, they’re not here. No one else is here. You are stuck with me. It’s only me,” Swift prefaced Friday during the “Surprise Songs” portion of her show.
“But I am gonna talk about another artist. I just feel like, you know, stadiums are huge and it’s important to really communicate, so that’s what I’m doing. I’m gonna talk about another artist who has an album that just came out that is so incredible. The National just had an album come out. This band has influenced me beyond my ability to verbalize how much they’ve influenced me. Just lyrically, their ability to set a scene, their ability to tell a story. And obviously, Aaron Dessner is in the National and he has completely changed my life.”
Dessner served as the primary collaborator on Swift’s Folklore and Evermore, while also contributing to a handful of Midnights bonus tracks. “Coney Island” is the lone collaboration between Swift and the National that also credits the band as a featured artist; Swift returned the favor by appearing on the National’s just-released LP.
Trending
“I was lucky enough to be able to write a song with them for their new album, which is called the First Two Pages of Frankenstein. Check it out, stream it, buy it on vinyl. I love them so much. They’ve been so kind to me,” Swift added. “So, I’m not gonna sing the song that we have on this new album — it’s called ‘The Alcott’ — check that out, though. But I am gonna sing ‘Coney Island.’”
Friday also saw the live premiere of the Fearless-era track “Other Side of the Door,” 15 years after the track’s release:
I first met Oscar Munoz when he spoke at our TIME100 Summit in 2019 about the turnaround he was leading at United Airlines. In the years since, we’ve had conversations about numerous topics ranging from leadership in crisis (a mandatory skill in the airline industry) and his pushback against “shrink to growth” as a business strategy to my own parochial pet peeves about Newark Airport. But it wasn’t until reading his new book, which publishes this week, that I learned about his remarkable life story—or just how close to death he was in the hours after suffering a heart attack in his first weeks on the job as CEO.
Called Turnaround Time, borrowed from the measure of how quickly a plane can land and then take off again, the book describes Munoz’s journey: moving between villages in Mexico with his grandmother; coming to the U.S. as an undocumented immigrant (“a Dreamer long before DACA,” as he puts it); touring Harvard College as a young “surfer dude”—he declined their admission offer; and ultimately becoming CEO of a major public company. Today, he sits on several corporate boards, including Univision, CBRE, and Salesforce, whose co-founder and CEO Marc Benioff is TIME’s owner.
This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Walter Isaacson, our mutual friend, United board member, and former TIME editor, writes in the foreword that this is, both in a corporeal and metaphorical sense, a book about the heart. Let’s start with the metaphorical. There’s a scene where your executive team, minutes before you’re about to go get a heart transplant, makes a formal decision that you’re going to start with listening to employees and improving employee relations as a first priority among the many problems the company was facing. Was that a decision unique to United in that moment, where you had such terrible morale post-Continental merger, and with a heavily unionized workforce? Or is that a general business philosophy?
It’s probably a slight hybrid. Airlines are a completely decentralized workforce. Your interaction with a gate agent, or with a flight attendant, that’s mostly what you’ll remember from your flight. And so the leadership approach from my perspective was, how do you capture the hearts and minds of thousands of employees who are so distributed, for whom the level of discretionary effort they’ll put forward is dependent in part on how they’re feeling.
There’s a point also early on where a flight attendant says something that really stuck with you.
That was the seminal moment. After a little bit of prompting, she broke down in tears and angrily said, “Oscar, I’m just tired of always having to say ‘I’m sorry.’ ‘I’m sorry we’re late.’ ‘I’m sorry we have sh-tty coffee.’” It was a point where people would almost rather say they were unemployed than work at United.
Chief executive officer of United Airlines Oscar Munoz speaks during the Time 100 Summit event on April 23, 2019, in New York.
Don Emmert—AFP/Getty Images
Switching gears to the corporeal. You’re 37 days into the job as United CEO. You have a massive heart attack, the kind that is almost always deadly, and then you need a transplant. And I kept thinking as I read it, does he really want to keep doing this job? You could easily have concluded that your body had a lot of work to do and you want to live first.
The decision to stay at the end of the day for everyone, including my family, was an easy one. Even though I was only 37 days of going out into our network and traveling, and seeing people all hours of the night, and making these connections, the decision was evident by the letters and banners and flowers and food that kept coming to my apartment. There were bags of letters, an outpouring. And when my kids read them, it was just one of those things where it’s like, ‘Dad, you have to go back, these people really want you.’ There was also a nurse who said, ‘You know there are two kinds of people that come in here: One is why did this happen to me? The other is, why was I spared? I have a further purpose.’
You were vegan, an avid runner and biker, no prior signs of heart disease. And you have this horrific heart attack. What have you taken from that?
You don’t have to look like a walking heart attack to be vulnerable to one. Sometimes when it hits you, it is just genetics. I never knew my father. So I didn’t have that history. Or there’s just something weak in a particular part of your heart that is hard to diagnose without an invasive test. When it happened to me, I crawled to my phone, called 911 and gave them my address. Because you know, I’m on the 50th floor of an apartment building in Chicago. And they’re not going to find you just through GPS.
Your personal journey is truly remarkable—being raised by your grandmother in Mexico and at first not even recognizing your mother when you joined her in the U.S., one of nine kids in your family, so many challenges and barriers in your childhood. How do you see your early life story shaping your later life story?
It was accidents, but it was also caring humans reaching out along the way to someone in whom they saw promise in some way, and acting on it. And that’s the through line, it’s my philosophy, my duty to care, I call it. Why sit and listen? Because throughout my entire life there has always been somebody around me that has watched out for me, and kind of pushed me in the right direction.
You write that your grandmother, who was a maid at a Las Vegas hotel well into her 80s, was on your mind as you corrected that first response to the incident where a United passenger was violently dragged off the plane and injured.
At first, the advice was around how to spin and because it was on a partner airline and not a United Aircraft, it was the Chicago police authority, etc. So we had lots of reasons why to say it wasn’t us. Other than the reality is like, OK, bullsh-t, you’re deep into this. Trying to sneak your way out is not going to make practical sense. At the end of the day, it’s your fault. So just own it. And that’s what my grandmother would have done. My final words that came out on Good Morning America were me thinking about, in essence, what would she do in this situation. She would not blame others, she would not try to spin, she would just say, ‘Listen, I let those policies and procedures get in the way of doing the right thing for another human being.’
In writing about the decisions that every CEO now faces, around when to speak out on topics of public policy, you say that silence sometimes becomes a vice. And you describe certain topics that you spoke out about while at United, including the Trump “zero tolerance” immigration policy that separated children from their families. How do you think about that dilemma of when to speak out on a topic that might or might not seem core to your stockholders?
You have to think about your purpose and vision as a company. Ours was connecting people to the things that matter most, and uniting the world given that we traveled to the most countries of any airline. We have so many different cultures embedded in our workforce that the concept of diversity and inclusion and awareness is something that we did naturally do. Of course, I have my views, but they’re not the company’s views. I have to keep them private. But this situation of separating children from their parents, what part of connecting people and uniting the world does that reflect?
You write about what you call “knowledge of contribution,” a way for people to understand themselves and what they’re really a fit for and what they are not.
It routes back to the concept of knowing yourself. I always use a simple example. If you’re a plumber, and you’re the best plumber in the world, if the job is a plumbing job, you’re going to do great. If it’s not a plumbing job, but you take it anyway, the likelihood of success is not great. Get people around you who are really honest with you.
I speak about leadership a lot. And I’m always careful to allow people the one choice they have in how they lead: figure out who you are, and what you do best. Not what you want to be, not what others want you to be. That is the root DNA that’s going to affect every decision.
As an aviation outsider before you came to the airline industry, what was your biggest surprise?
How personal it is, both to the people that work inside it and the people that fly. I mean, there’s not a single person who flies and doesn’t have an opinion about 1,000 little different things. They’re not just a number, they’re not just a seat number, they’re not just a confirmation number. They’re humans headed to someplace that matters to them. And you can’t please everyone. But you can certainly try to put your best foot forward. And that comes from the heart, and from genuine discretionary effort. If you can get an organization to feel that way about what they do, you’re going to have a better chance of making someone feel really good about their flight. By the way, the reward for having a really good flight is you don’t hear a damn word about it. But any slight blip? Oh my God.
Are there lessons you now have for the rest of us that would make us more effective, happier travelers?
Yes. When you’re flying, try to understand that you are not the only person who has something to get to, you’re not the only one who has an event, you’re not the only one who is in a rush, you’re not the only one who hit traffic or who somebody looked at the wrong way. These are people who work their asses off for you. There’s no one in the airline going, ‘Oh Edward’s flying today, let’s see how we can mess with him. Cancel that one flight.’
I was speaking at an event the day that Southwest had its meltdown. A lot of people in the audience had to fly, and this man’s question was, ‘What would you have us do as we try to figure out how to get home?’ And the answer was simple. Give them a handshake because they had zero to do with the situation that somebody in corporate caused. They’re having a worst day, because every single human that they’ve touched today is angry at them. So this concept of civility, and caring, is my best advice writ large.
At Saturday evening’s annual White House Correspondents Dinner, hosted by the White House Correspondents Association, President Biden targeted some of his biggest political enemies, including a certain representative from Georgia.
“I want everyone to have fun tonight, but please be safe,” POTUS joked. “If you find yourself disoriented, you’re either drunk… or Marjorie Taylor Greene.”
Elon Musk, a critic who leans right, also may have wondered why his ears were burning. Biden said, “Not everybody loves NPR. Elon Musk tweeted that it should be defunded. Well, the best way to make NPR go away is for Elon Musk to buy it.”
When the crowd howled in response, he ad-libbed, “That’s more true than you think! Anyway…”
President Biden recently confirmed he and VP Kamala Harris are running for reelection in 2024. Referencing why he feels another term is a must, he said, “The job isn’t finished.” He then landed one of his best shots, adding, “I mean, it is finished for Tucker Carlson…”
Carlson was abruptly fired from Fox News last week.
Wrapping things up, President Biden assured everyone he could take a joke, but cautioned that Dark Brandon may not be so forgiving. He then donned a pair of sunglasses, bringing to life an Internet meme of Biden’s edgier self, the side of him often cited when he is enjoying a victory.
The WHCA is a 109-year-old organization of journalists who cover the White House. Its yearly dinner is patterned after a roast, with the sitting POTUS expected to lob barbs, and to take some hits from that year’s featured performer.
The comic for 2023 was stand-up comic Roy Wood Jr., who immediately referenced the scandal involving President Biden’s handling of classified documents upon taking the podium. Wood later segued into serious talk about the importance of the free press.
Meta is shutting down its Facebook Watch original programming, a company spokesperson confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter, leaving the future of shows like Red Table Talkin limbo as production company Westbrook Studios shops around the talk show for a new home.
The shuttering of the Facebook Watch originals division, first reported by Deadline, comes as Meta implements wide-ranging cost cuts across the company, with the most recent including a round of layoffs that is expected to impact 10,000 employees. Included in the cuts is Mina Lefevre, the former MTV executive who led development and original programming for Facebook Watch.
One of Facebook Watch’s most well-known shows was Red Table Talk, the talk show co-hosted by Jada Pinkett Smith, Willow Smith and Adrienne Banfield-Norris. The series had five seasons on Facebook Watch and led to a spinoff series, Red Table Talk: The Estefans, with Gloria Estefan, Emily Estefan and Lili Estefan. The original series debuted in 2018 and featured conversations that sparked widespread conversation online, including episodes that dived into the tumultuous moments of Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith’s marriage. Guests from the last season, which concluded in December, included iCarly star Jennette McCurdy, Shark Tank mogul Barbara Corcoran, Crazy Rich Asians star Constance Wu and Glass Onion star Janelle Monáe, among others.
In a message shared to her Instagram on Thursday, Pinkett Smith said she was “sorry to see the whole [Facebook Watch] team disband.” “We at Red Table are in talks of finding a new home and we’ll see you soon,” she said.
Other programming on the Meta-run platform has included the drama series Sorry for Your Loss, which starred Elizabeth Olsen as a widow grieving her husband and was canceled after two seasons; the unscripted series Simone vs. Herself with Olympian Simone Biles; the interview show Steve with Steve Harvey; and the reality series JoJo Goes with JoJo Siwa.
In shutting down original programming, Meta is following other tech giants like YouTube and Snap, which have both significantly scaled back or moved away entirely from original content.
April 28, 2:35 p.m. Updated with a statement from Jada Pinkett Smith.
The gated Hidden Hills community some of the Kardashians, and other wealthy folks, call home is investing in serious security upgrades — a change brought on by a spate of uninvited visitors for the famous sisters.
Law enforcement sources tell TMZ … the gated community, where KimKardashianand Kylie Jenner both reside, recently enlisted more security guards and installed a new camera system.
We’re told the new tech allows for real-time reporting of intruders, and the measures are doing wonders for the area’s crime rate. Burglaries have gone from multiple each week to a flat zero. On top of that, potential trespassers have been stopped and turned away before things can escalate.
The recent beef-up comes as a result of the area getting hammered with burglaries, stalkers and obsessed fans trying to get inside … incidents that definitely ring a bell for Kim and co.
As we reported, a man named Deandre Williamswas arrested in October after wandering into the community — slipping past the security, but not getting far before he was nabbed. Our sources told us he was certainly infatuated with Kim, too.
Before that, another man showed up at her home multiple times — and even though she got a TRO against him, he later violated it.
When all that drama leads to safer streets for all, call it silver linings … “kourtesy” of the Kardashians.
When the most recent Hollywood strike took place — 16 years ago — the internet had not yet transformed the television and movie businesses. Broadcast networks still commanded colossal audiences, and cable channels were still growing. The superhero boom had begun for movie studios, and DVDs generated $16 billion in annual sales.
Since then, galloping technological change has upended Hollywood in ways that few could have imagined. Traditional television is on viewership life support. Movie studios, stung by poor ticket sales for dramas and comedies, have retreated almost entirely to franchise spectacles. The DVD business is over; Netflix will ship its last little silver discs on Sept. 29.
It’s a streaming world now. The pandemic sped up the shift.
What has not changed much? The formulas that studios use to pay television and movie creators, setting the stage for another strike. “Writer compensation needs to evolve for a streaming-first world,” said Rich Greenfield, a founder of the LightShed Partners research firm.
Absent an unlikely last-minute resolution with studios, more than 11,000 unionized screenwriters could head to picket lines in Los Angeles and New York as soon as Tuesday, an action that, depending on its duration, would bring Hollywood’s creative assembly lines to a gradual halt. Writers Guild of America leaders have called this an “existential” moment, contending that compensation has stagnated despite the proliferation of content in the streaming era — to the degree that even writers with substantial experience are having a hard time getting ahead and, sometimes, paying their bills.
“Writers at every level and in every genre, whether it’s features or TV, we’re all being devalued and financially taken advantage of by the studios,” said Danny Tolli, a writer whose credits include “Roswell, New Mexico” and the Shondaland show “The Catch.”
“These studios are making billions in profits, and they are spending billions on content — content that we create with our blood, sweat and tears,” Mr. Tolli continued. “But there are times when I still have to worry about how I’m going to pay my mortgage. How I’m going to provide for my family. I have considered Uber to supplement my income.”
Studio chiefs have largely maintained public silence, leaving communication to the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which bargains on their behalf. In statements, the organization has said its goal was a “mutually beneficial deal,” which was “only possible if the guild is committed to turning its focus to serious bargaining” and “searching for reasonable compromises.”
Privately, numerous studio and streaming service executives portrayed writers as histrionic and out of touch. You can’t make a living as a TV writer? By what standard? The business has changed; get used to it.
By some measures, a major strike in Hollywood is long overdue. Since the 1940s, with a couple of exceptions, strikes have shaken the entertainment industry almost like clockwork — every seven or eight years — usually aligning with upheaval in the fast-changing business. The dawn of television. The rise of cable networks.
“These things gotta happen every five years or so, 10 years,” Clemenza, the weathered Corleone capo explains in “The Godfather,” one of Hollywood’s most storied creations, as the film’s gangster families “go to the mattresses” against one another. “Helps to get rid of the bad blood.”
For generations, ever since the end of the silent film era, Hollywood writers have complained that studios treat them as second-class citizens — that their artistic contributions are underappreciated (and undercompensated), especially compared with those of actors and directors.
Among Hollywood workers, screenwriters have walked out the most often (six times) and were responsible for the entertainment industry’s most recent strike in 2007. It was a precarious economic time — the Great Recession was underway — but “new media” was on the horizon. Apple had started to sell iPods that could play video. Disney was offering $2 downloads for episodes of “Lost.” Hulu was in the start-up stages.
The existing contract between studios and the Writers Guild of America, which expires at 12:01 a.m. Pacific time on Tuesday, sets minimum weekly pay for certain television writer-producers at $7,412. (Agents for experienced writers can negotiate that up.) One problem, according to the guild, involves the number of weeks writers work in the streaming era.
Because of streaming, the network norms of 22, 24 or even 26 episodes per season have mostly disappeared. Most streaming series are eight to 12 episodes long. As a result, the median writer-producer works nearly 40 weeks on a network show, according to guild data, but only 24 weeks on a streaming show, making it difficult to earn a stable paycheck.
Residuals have also been undercut by streaming. Before streaming, writers could receive residual payments whenever a show was resold — into syndication, for overseas airing, on DVD. But global streaming services like Netflix and Amazon have cut off those distribution arms.
Instead, streaming services pay a fixed residual. Writers say there is no way to know whether those fees are fair because services hide viewership data. A new contract, guild leaders have said, must include a formula for paying residuals based on views.
Guild leaders contend that it would cost studios a collective $600 million a year to give them everything they want. The companies, however, are under pressure from Wall Street to cut costs. And gains for one group of entertainment workers would almost certainly need to be extended to others: Contracts with the Directors Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA, the actors’ union, expire on June 30.
Hollywood companies say they simply cannot afford widespread raises. Loaded with $45 billion in debt, Disney laid off thousands of employees in recent days, part of a campaign to eliminate 7,000 jobs by the end of June. Disney+ remains unprofitable, although the company has vowed to change that by next year. Disney is Hollywood’s largest supplier of union-covered TV dramas and comedies (890 episodes for the 2021-22 season).
Warner Bros. Discovery, which has roughly $47 billion in debt, has already cut thousands of jobs as part of a $4 billion pullback. NBCUniversal is also tightening its belt as it contends with cable cord-cutting and a troublesome advertising market.
These companies remain highly profitable. But they have not been delivering the kind of steady profit growth that Wall Street rewards.
Screenwriters come into these talks with notable swagger. In 2019, when film and TV writers fired their agents in a campaign over what they saw as conflicts of interest, many agency leaders figured that the guild would eventually fracture. That never happened: After a 22-month standoff, the big agencies effectively gave writers what they wanted.
For screenwriters, there is also pent-up demand for raises, made worse by climbing inflation. When writers last had the opportunity to negotiate a contract, the pandemic was shutting down Hollywood, and so the two sides came to a speedy agreement — “essentially kicking the can down the road” in the words of Mr. Greenfield. In the negotiation cycle before that, writers focused more on shoring up their generous health plan.
And writers have been incensed by mixed messaging from companies on their financial health.
“NBCUniversal is performing extremely well operationally and financially,” Brian Roberts, the chief executive of Comcast, which owns NBCUniversal, wrote to employees last week, when the division’s top executive was ousted.
Netflix’s co-chief executive, Ted Sarandos, received a pay package worth $50.3 million in 2022, up 32 percent from 2021, Netflix disclosed last week.
“Lots of people are still getting very rich off of Hollywood product — just not the creators of that product,” said Matt Ember, a screenwriter whose credits include “Get Smart,” “The War With Grandpa” and the animated “Home.”
The upshot: The situation might get worse before it gets better.
“Every industry goes through course corrections,” said Laura Lewis, the founder of Rebelle Media, an entertainment production and financing company. “Maybe this is an opportunity to adjust the models for the next phase of the entertainment business.”
“The question,” she continued, “is how much pain will we have to endure to get there.”