The Microsoft Excel add-in for EVE Online has finally launched almost a year after CCP games first announced the feature.
This latest feature for EVE Online massively plays into the MMO’s reputation for being a spreadsheet simulation. The add-in will allow players to analyze their in-game data like nothing else before.
Thankfully you don’t need a lot of experience to work this out, as the whole point is to make this as easy as possible. With this add-in at your fingertips, players can manage frontline warfare, maximize profits, monitor kills, track earnings, and detail character progress over time. You can be a manufacturer, a PvP fighter, or an enforcer, it’s accessible to every role.
(Image credit: CCP Games)
This collaboration with Microsoft Excel is the first of its kind and is a brilliant use of the renowned software. “[It’s] been both a very enjoyable experience and a very natural fit,” EVE Online creative director Bergur Finnbogason said. “Our players continue to encourage us to explore more ways to make EVE approachable. Advanced EVE players are known to use spreadsheets as a data management tool, so the Excel add-in is a crucial step in achieving that goal.”
“CCP Games has extensive experience in the MMO space, so it’s only natural that we collaborate with them to launch the first-ever native Microsoft Excel add-in for a video game,” Microsoft head of product Excel, Catherine Pidgeon said. “With the add-in, the EVE Online player base can seamlessly export and manage data without third-party tools.”
If you’re wondering how to access this new brilliant feature then check out CCP’s extensive FAQ which explained how to install the add-on, free of charge. However, if you’re already familiar with Excel then all you have to do is click the Insert tab, then access the Get Add-ins button, and finally EVE Online should appear.
This news is a thrilling expansion to the ever-growing story of EVE Online and just proves that this title keeps earning its spot on our best MMO games list.
Composer John Williams has been with the Indiana Jones series since its beginning with 1981’s Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark. Now, 42 years later, Williams returns to finish the series out with a score mixed with new themes and iconic classics.
On Tuesday, Disney released a featurette, “The Final Score,” which documents Williams’ journey with the series, which culminated with Williams pulling off a surprise performance of some of the music with full orchestra during the film’s North American premiere last week in Los Angeles (watch that performance above).
“His music gave such detail to every single heart-stopping moment, and bonded all of these films together and gave these films a musical identity,” says Steven Spielberg in the featurette. Adds Williams: “I’ve been fortunate enough to be associated with the films for quite a long time and to, with each film, add more to the collection of musical material.”
Watch the featurette here.
At the L.A. premiere, which came after the James Mangold-directed pic bowed at the Cannes Film Festival, Williams was introduced by Spielberg as a surprise for the audience, calling him “the great maestro” and “the glue to all five of these films.” Williams played three compositions, including the classic “Raiders March,” written for the first film, and the new “Helena’s Theme,” written for Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s character Helena in the new film.
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, which hits theaters June 30, marks the return of the legendary archeologist, played by Harrison Ford, for a final adventure. Jones must race against time to save a legendary artifact from the hands of an old enemy, with the help of his goddaughter Helena.
The suspect and victims have been identified by law enforcement authorities in a mass shooting Saturday outside the Gorge amphitheater in Washington state that left an engaged couple dead and two other concertgoers wounded.
Killed in the campground adjacent to the Gorge during the Beyond Wonderland music festival were Brandy Escamilla and Josilyn Summer Ruiz, both from Seattle, who were engaged to be married. Left wounded in the gunfire were Lily Luksich, who was reported to have attended the concert with the shooter, and Andrew Cuadra, aka August Morningstar.
Accused in the shootings is James M. Kelly, 26, an active-duty soldier stationed at Washington’s Joint Base Lewis-McChord. Kelly, who joined the Army in 2021, was was shot by a Moses Lake police detective, ending the melee Saturday night. After being released from the hospital Tuesday, Kelly was booked on two counts of first-degree murder, two-counts of first-degree assault and one count of first-degree assault domestic violence.
Escamilla died from a gunshot wound to the head and Ruiz succumbed to a gunshot wound to the torso, according to Grant County Coroner Craig Morrison, as reported by KXLY in Spokane. The couple were said to have been shot as they walked through the campground adjacent to the venue.
On top of the four killed or wounded, a fifth person — a security guard — was reported to have been hit by a bullet, but it deflected off her glasses, leaving the guard with lacerations but no serious injuries.
At a press conference late Saturday night, local police said they knew of no motive for the shootings, and none has been released subsequently.
Beyond Wonderland, an EDM festival, continued into the late hours after the gunfire on Saturday, with most concertgoers becoming aware of the shootings nearby only as they received texts from worried friends learning about the mayhem from the news. The second day of music planned for Sunday was canceled. One of the largest and most iconic amphitheaters in the country, the Gorge has a capacity of around 27,000, although no attendance figures were released for the festival.
On Tuesday, one of the injured, August Morningstar of Eugene, a father of two who was shot in the shoulder, spoke with Seattle television station KOMO. “I just walked into something I had nothing to do with. I turned around,” he said in a Zoom interview from his hospital bed. “Before he saw me, he killed someone, and I think he thought I saw what happened. I guess he wanted to get rid of any witnesses.” Morningstar said the gunman chased him and he had to “bob and weave” between cars and tents before eluding the shooter hiding behind a friend’s tent.
Morningstar said he heard five or six shots that he at first assumed were fireworks. “I heard (a voice saying), ‘Don’t do this, don’t, you don’t got to do this.’ Two seconds later, the shooter pops out.”
Joint Base Lewis-McChord Lt. Col. Mike Burns told media that the suspect is a joint fire support specialist assigned to the 75th Ranger Regiment. “First, the U.S. Army Special Operations Command extends our condolences to the victims and families of those affected by this act of violence,” said Burns in a statement. “The command is aware of the allegations against Spc. James Kelly. We take all allegations seriously and are fully cooperating with the appropriate authorities.”
GoFundMe accounts have been set up for funeral and other expenses for the families of Ruiz (here), a registered nurse, and Escamilla (here), who also held a nursing degree. The Ruiz GoFundMe had raised more than $67,000 as of this writing, and the fundraiser for Escamilla’s family was up past $24,000. A GoFundMe was also established for the medical bills for Morningstar (here), up to $26,000 as of this writing. “As of right now we don’t know if he will ever be mobile in his shoulder again,” reads the copy for his fundraiser.
Hema Malini’s daughter Esha Deol congratulated Karan Deol, while Kangana Ranaut’s production took a dig at Hrithik Roshan.
From Esha Deol reacting to Karan Deol’s wedding to Kangana Ranaut’s production dragging Hrithik Roshan – here are the top headlines of the day.
Dharmendra’s grandson Karan Deol – son of superstar Sunny Deol – tied the knot with his longtime girlfriend Drisha Acharya on June 18 in the presence of his family and close friends. After an intimate wedding ceremony, the Deol family hosted a reception which was a star-studded affair. However, what grabbed many eyeballs was the absence of Hema Malini, who is married to Dharmendra, and their daughters Esha and Ahana from all ceremonies. Now, Esha has finally congratulated her step-nephew on his wedding with Drisha and sent her best wishes to the newlyweds.
On June 18, the team of Adipurush decided to make “alterations” to the film’s dialogues after the dialogues of Hanuman received backlash for sounding overly colloquial, offending the audience. “Kapda tere baap ka… toh jalegi bhi tere baap ki” has been modified to “Kapda teri Lanka ka… toh jalegi bhi teri Lanka.”
Honey Singh Death Threat: Popular singer-rapper Yo Yo Honey Singh has claimed to have received threat call from Goldy Brar, the main accused in Sidhu Moose Wala murder case. The singer reportedly approached Delhi Police for protection. He reportedly visited the Delhi Police headquarters where he met the Commissioner to file a complaint on Wednesday.
Kangana Ranaut is getting trolled after a new promo of Tiku Weds Sheru, a film produced by her, featured a dig at Hrithik Roshan. On Wednesday, Prime Video released a video in which Nawazuddin Siddiqui was seen introducing himself as ‘Sheru’, a Bollywood actor and producer who has worked with Salman Khan, Shah Rukh Khan and even Aamir Khan. While listing the names, Nawaz’s Sheru purposely takes Hrithik Roshan’s name and explains the reason behind his missing photo.
Filmmakers are often known to foster and plan projects for years enabling them to give audiences an experience like never before. Sanjay Leela Bhansali, considered amongst one of the top directors in Indian cinema, is known for his grand and visually stunning productions. He is also known to nurture his passion projects for years before bringing them to life on the silver screen. Now, News18 Showsha has learnt that Bhansali has finally decided to bring Baiju Bawra to life after 20 years of “meticulous planning”.
Shreyanka Mazumdar is Chief Sub Editor of the entertainment team at News18. With an unbridled passion for all things Bollywood, music and fashion, she…Read More
Two years ago, Pamela Anderson’s eldest son, Brandon Thomas Lee,asked documentary filmmaker Ryan White (“Good Night Oppy,” “The Keepers”) to directa film about his iconic,misunderstood mom. “He kind of wasn’t into it,” says Lee, who, undeterred, leaned into his pitch. “I was like, ‘Listen, just meet her. You guys will get along.’” Later, after White and Anderson spent a couple of hours nonstop talking on Zoom, White was all in.
“Everything Brandon told me was confirmed,” White says. “Pamela Anderson isn’t what you expect her to be. I was very pleasantly surprised and felt like, if we could translate the surprise of that conversation to a documentary, the audience was going to be surprised too. That’s a recipe for great documentary film.”
Ryan, so Brandon, then 24, didn’t just want you to direct “Pamela, a love story,” he planned to be a producer. Did you see red flags?
Ryan White: Many, many red flags. You never want to work with the child of your documentary subject. But it became clear early on Brandon was essential to the trust factor with Pamela. Having [her] son as an integral part of the team made her feel like her story would be taken care of.
Pamela Anderson: Brandon’s my truth barometer. I don’t think he’s capable of watering things down. I trust his vision. They convinced me that “since there’s all this interest in your life, why don’t you tell the story?” Even that sounds corny. But a day doesn’t go by when people don’t come up to me and say, “I love you. I resonate with your story.” It made a difference in my life.
Were there discussions about what the documentary would look like?
White: From the start I said, “I make very bare-bones, stripped-down, raw films.” And she said, “I love that.” There’s literally no lights used in this film. That’s all natural light in her home. And we’re talking about one of the most famous models on camera ever. It was a crew of four people. She just plopped down on the couch and we started talking. I felt like it was so real. I hope that lends this film a sense of intimacy.
Brandon Lee: So many of these are like an ass-kissing festival. I think ours is the exact opposite. My goal was to share the real her. Pamela is such a positive and lovable person. She’s really like that, and I’m her son. I love her to death. But I’m the most annoyed and sick of her out of everybody. [Laughs.]
Did your conception of the documentary change over time?
White: What they always say about docs is if you end up making the film you set out to make, you did something wrong. From the beginning, I thought our film was about this small-town girl from an island in Canada who’d lived this crazy life, then returned to that island, married a Canadian guy and was living out her final years on her family land. [But then] Pamela chose to get divorced. She chose to take a role in [the musical] “Chicago.”
But the Hulu show [“Pam & Tommy”] was completely out of our control. We had to be nimble when it came to storytelling. It wasn’t the tidy narrative we thought it’d be. I feel like for the second half of the shoot, we were on an adventure. I had no idea where it was going. I don’t think Pamela knew where it was going, either. That’s why the final line of the film is like, “I don’t know what’s next. Maybe I’ll decide next week.” I felt like that’s the perfect encapsulation of Pamela Anderson.
Brandon, you’ve said making this was important for your mom. How about for you?
Lee: I’ve said this before, but I thought it was like watching my life come together in reverse. I’d find myself watching things being like, ”Oh, that’s why we were there” and “That’s why this happened.” Lots of things I felt were missing pieces [and] didn’t understand kind of came together. It felt like I was on drugs. It was a very crazy, realistic and visceral experience.
The documentary includes clips of late-night talk show hosts and TV interviewers asking you about your breasts. Has anyone apologized? Jay Leno? Matt Lauer?
Anderson: No. But I really believe at that point all I put out into the universe was my body. How would anybody know to ask me about the things I really care about or believe? Even though I was on Jay Leno probably over 10 times, he kept asking me the same questions about boobs and boyfriends. So I just kind of smiled my way through it. I can be angry about a lot of things, but it takes up so much energy. I’d rather feel joy and happiness and love.
Lee: I think that answer literally is the most “my mom” answer I’ve ever heard. It lets everyone that’s done anything wrong to her completely off the hook because she’s focused on moving through her life positively and with grace. In my opinion, what those people did was a complete violation. And for her to say that always gets me a bit frustrated because she lets them off easy. And I still think the fact that we didn’t hear from any of these people is sort of ridiculous.
Announced by The Walt Disney Company earlier today, the upcoming Marvel Studios films Captain America: Brave New World, Thunderbolts,Blade, Untitled Deadpool Movie, Fantastic Four, Avengers: The Kang Dynasty and Avengers: Secret Wars have all received slightly shifted release dates. Find all the new dates listed below:
Want more exciting information The Multiverse Saga? Stay tuned to Marvel.com for more details! And be sure to follow Marvel on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Supergirl actor Sasha Calle has skillfully evaded questions regarding the controversies surrounding The Flash movie star Ezra Miller. After years of being stuck in development hell, The Flash finally got its theatrical release, with Miller returning to the big screen as Barry Allen. One real life topic that has further complicated the film over the last year is the long list of legal allegations against Miller, which got to the point where The Flash’s own lead was barely part of the promotional tour of the DCEU movie.
SCREENRANT VIDEO OF THE DAYSCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Leading up to The Flash’s release, several members of the film’s cast and creative team have been asked about Miller and what it was like working with the non-binary star. However, one actor who dodged the question altogether was Calle, who brought Kara Zor-El, a.k.a. Supergirl, to life in The Flash. During a recent interview with New York Times, the actress shifted the question about working with Miller into a different direction by instead talking about working with her stunt team, sharing the following:
I spent a lot of time with my stunt team from the moment I arrived to the moment I left. And it was incredible being with my stunt team. I can’t not talk about them. I swear to you, they were my family through and through.
What The Flash Cast & Director Have Said About Ezra Miller
While Calle may have dodged talking about Miller, others have spoken positively about The Flash’s leading actor. The director himself, Andy Muschietti, has spoken highly of Miller before and after the legal allegations arose for the actor, which resulted in Miller seeking treatment for complex mental health issues. Muschietti even went as far as saying that no one could replace Miller in The Flash 2 if a sequel were to happen.
Kiersey Clemons, who played Iris West in The Flash, spoke about Miller in February 2023 about their co-star’s situation, saying that it was tough to see what they were going through after having had a great time working together on the film. Michael Shannon, who got to return as General Zod for the first time since 2016’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, also had similar notes about feeling bad for Miller, calling them “lovely” and “very kind to me when I was there.” Long-time DCEU star Ben Affleck, who returned one last time as Batman, also voiced his positive experience working with Miller during The Flash’s big premiere last week.
Time will tell if Ezra Miller is done portraying the DC icon, as James Gunn and Peter Safran have previously stated that they might bring them back for the new DC Universe. Although given The Flash’s struggling box office performance, it wouldn’t be shocking if this is the last time Miller portrays the hero, as DC Studios are going for their reboot. If The Flash is the final time that Miller will be portraying the speedster, it will be interesting to see who will take over from them in the new DC Universe.
Nintendo has released 27 screenshots of its upcoming Super Mario RPG remake.
The game, which is set to be released on Switch on November 17, is a remake of SNES title Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars.
“Originally released on Super NES, Super Mario RPG has been overhauled with new graphics,” Nintendo’s official description reads.
“Join Mario, Bowser, Princess Peach, and original characters Mallow and Geno, in an RPG filled with twists, turns and treasure.
“Mario must team up with his allies to face down a menacing force known as the Smithy Gang in order to recover seven stars and repair the Star Road.
“Whether you played the original game or have yet to take the journey, you can dive into this Nintendo Switch version of the very first RPG in the Super Mario series.”
The Thing About Pam producer has closed the rights for an adaptation and is developing the book, which was recently described by the New York Times as an “expertly paced psychological thriller”, as a limited series or streaming movie.
The Quiet Tenant, which was published this month by Knopf in the U.S. and Abacus in the U.K, is a thriller about a serial killer, narrated by those closest to him: his 13-year old daughter, his girlfriend and the captive victim he has earmarked for death.
In the book. Aidan Thomas is a hard-working family man and a somewhat beloved figure in the small upstate town where he lives. He’s the kind of man who always lends a hand and has a good word for everyone. But Aidan has a dark secret he’s been keeping from everyone in town and those closest to him. He’s a kidnapper and serial killer. Aidan has murdered eight women and there’s a ninth he has earmarked for death: Rachel, imprisoned in a backyard shed, fearing for her life.
When Aidan’s wife dies, he and his thirteen-year-old daughter Cecilia are forced to move. Aidan has no choice but to bring Rachel along, introducing her to Cecilia as a “family friend” who needs a place to stay. Aidan is betting on Rachel, after five years of captivity, being too brainwashed and fearful to attempt to escape. But Rachel is a fighter and survivor, and recognizes Cecilia might just be the lifeline she has waited for all these years. As Rachel tests the boundaries of her new living situation, she begins to form a tenuous connection with Cecilia. And when Emily, a local restaurant owner, develops a crush on the handsome widower, she finds herself drawn into Rachel and Cecilia’s orbit, coming dangerously close to discovering Aidan’s secret.
Michallon said she “knew from the beginning” that her serial killer would not get to speak. “I’m a reporter by trade, so I took writing an authentic serial killer novel as a great responsibility. Since the serial killer here victimizes women, there was something important in the centering of female voices,” she said.
Michallon will executive produce on the project. Obviously no writers are yet attached.
On the television side, in addition to NBC’s Renee Zellweger-fronted The Thing About Pam, Blumhouse is behind HBO’s Sharp Objects and Showtime’s The Good Lord Bird as well as Amazon’s upcoming The Horror of Dolores Roach.
“I read Clémence’s novel in one sitting and was riveted. The story has all the elements of a great screen adaptation,” said Jason Blum, Founder and CEO of Blumhouse.
“Jason Blum is one of the most dynamic producers working today,” added Michallon, “With an enviable slate of motion picture and television credits, and every one of them has viewers tethered to the screen. His vision for bringing The Quiet Tenant to viewers is incredibly strong. I am thrilled he has taken an interest in my work and to be collaborating with him on this project.”
Michallon was represented in the deal by Ryan Wilson at Anonymous Content and Stephen Barbara at Inkwell Management.
Tom Cruise is prepared to give his blood, sweat, tears, and frankly, his entire life for cinema. The man has been doing his own impossible stunt work for years, and Mission: Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part One is no exception. In fact, one might describe the newest film as a prime example of Cruise’s dedication, as the very first thing he shot for M:I7 was a motorcycle stunt director Christopher McQuarrie described as “far and away the most dangerous thing we’ve ever attempted.”
Leonardo DiCaprio thought Titanic was going to be ‘snoresville’
Speaking with Entertainment Tonight, Cruise was pretty casual about beginning production by risking life and limb. “Well we know, either we’re gonna continue with the film, or we’re not,” he laughed. “Let’s know day one: What is gonna happen? Do we all continue? Or is it a major rewrite, you know?”
“A major rewrite” is a shockingly understated Hollywood euphemism for the star possibly being killed or otherwise incapacitated! But actually, there are practical reasons for starting filming with the most difficult stunt. Preparing for it takes “years,” Cruise explained, even on top of his extensive stunt experience. “But to figure out the kind of thing to do something like that, we’re creating knowledge. We’re creating—it’s our understanding of story, our understanding of camera, how to do something like that, and it all kind of came to that moment.”
A pretty incredible behind-the-scenes featurette for the shot, which involved Cruise riding a motorcycle off a cliff, demonstrates exactly what he was talking about with ET. As McQuarrie explains in the video, the camera technology for this kind of stunt didn’t exist two years ago, so it required a lot of camera configuration on top of Cruise’s physical preparation. And the physical preparation was no joke: Cruise apparently did 30 jumps out of a plane per day, for a total of over 500 skydives, as well as more than 13,000 motocross jumps, all in service of his and McQuarrie’s mantra: “Don’t be careful, be competent.”
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One | The Biggest Stunt in Cinema History (Tom Cruise)
“I was training, I was ready, you have to be razor sharp when you do something like that,” the actor told ET. “So it was very important as we were prepping the film that that actually was the first thing, because you don’t—I don’t wanna drop that, and then go shoot other things, and then have my mind somewhere else. Everyone was prepped, let’s just get it done.”
And get it done they did. The tension is palpable behind the monitors as McQuarrie and crew observe Cruise pull off the stunt for the first time in the featurette, but all the hard work paid off—and he ended up doing the jump six times total. “It all comes down to one thing: the audience,” Cruise proclaims in the clip. Another mission made all the more possible.
During the first day of shooting Raven’s reality show, Raven and Booker accidentally reveal secrets on camera. The reality show producers think Victor is boring.
“They’re scared,” says Taylor Sheridan, looking amused as he steps onto his porch and away from a gaggle of publicists huddled inside his house. “They’re scared of what I might say.”
With good reason. The Yellowstone showrunner — who’s gone from an obscure actor to the most prolific writer in Hollywood in about a decade — isn’t known for pulling his punches and, lately, has been at the center of a stampede of dramatic headlines. His flagship show’s star, Kevin Costner, is exiting the series amid anonymous finger-pointing in the press. There have been showrunner shake-ups on two of his other projects — the Sylvester Stallone drama Tulsa King and the upcoming spy thriller Special Ops: Lioness — where Sheridan seized the creative reins. The creator was also the subject of a recent report that suggested he uses his production budgets to pad his pockets. And his lone-wolf writing style irks some of the writers marching in picket lines who are demanding staffing minimums on TV shows.
It’s a helluva lot of debate circling one hitmaker who created his own genre of neo-Western storytelling and whose shows are so popular, they’re propping up an entire streaming service. Over a couple of hours of conversation, Sheridan reveals his side to these stories for the first time while offering unparalleled insight into his writing and producing process.
Taylor Sheridan
Photographed by Emerson Miller
Sheridan takes a seat wearing a button-down shirt, rugged jacket, jeans and boots, complete with spurs (he was riding earlier). The 53-year-old is a formidable wall of blue denim, and his eyes are blue, too. Elizabeth Olsen, whom he directed in Wind River, once affectionately described Sheridan as “a cowboy who’s like a combination of your dad and the Marlboro Man.”
We’re sitting behind one of his houses on his massive Four Sixes ranch. The property is wedged up in the remote Texas panhandle, several hours’ drive from the nearest major city. (The Montana ranch in Yellowstone is fictional, but the Four Sixes, or 6666 — which is also featured in the series — is real.) Sheridan finalized his purchase last year, and it covers a staggering 270,000 acres — nearly the size of Los Angeles. Stretching from his porch is a dreamy field of virgin countryside extending to the horizon under cotton-ball clouds. There’s a warm breeze and, every so often, a Texas Longhorn steer trots by.
The importance of this place to Sheridan — and its connection to Yellowstone and to the rest of his TV universe — cannot be overstated. Sheridan grew up in North Texas, where the Four Sixes is legendary. The ranch and its horse-and-cattle operation were long controlled by a single dynastic family that battled for 150 years to protect their land and keep it largely intact. Sounds familiar, right?
“I grew up in the shadow of the Four Sixes,” Sheridan says. “To just get one of their horses was a status symbol, because they’re so well trained. This was the ranch I based [Yellowstone’s] scope and operation on, because it didn’t exist in Montana. Most ranches there had already been carved up. They’d already lost it.”
Acquiring the property, however, wasn’t easy. Sheridan says he renewed his overall deal at Paramount in 2021 and started pumping out prequels and pilots to help pay for all this. It was an extraordinary burst of get-the-ranch productivity that’s resulted in green lights for six series. Yet the amount of work that piled onto Sheridan’s plate as a result, coupled with his own obsessive drive to make every episode bearing his name just right, appeared to have some unforeseen consequences.
But first, let’s appreciate what Sheridan has accomplished, because it’s remarkable and rather strange. Twelve years ago, the struggling actor was down to his last $800 when he sold his first screenplay. He later created a TV show about a man who owns a dynastic mega-ranch who struggles to protect it and make it successful … and its success has allowed Sheridan to himself become a man who owns a dynastic mega-ranch who struggles to protect it and make it successful — and not just any ranch, but the same one that served as the basis for his show. Sheridan dreamed up a story, shared it with millions, and then stepped into it.
“Life imitating art was never my intention,” he says, and quips, “We haven’t killed anyone in weeks.”
Sheridan (who lives with his wife and 12-year-old son) points out that actually he’s been involved with ranching his whole life and previously owned a modest 1,200-acre property. “That was my dream and I already had it,” he says. “It was a great escape from the fact I was a failing actor living in West Hollywood. The plan was always to become a big movie star, then move back to a ranch and just do movies with Martin Scorsese when I felt like it.”
Sheridan laughs at this. “But that wasn’t my path.”
“YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS S—T UP”
“I was a fair actor, but that’s all I was ever going to be,” Sheridan recalls. “Hollywood will tell you what you’re supposed to do if you listen. If you’re banging your head against the wall for 20 years trying to be an actor, maybe you shouldn’t be an actor. But the first thing I ever wrote [the pilot for Mayor of Kingstown in 2011] got me meetings at every major network, at every agency. I had multiple people trying to buy it.”
Yet Sheridan refused to sell. The studios, he says, wanted to hire a room of more experienced writers to tackle the project — you know, make TV the usual way. Sheridan felt that he knew exactly how to write the show himself. So even back then, getting his first taste of success as a writer, Sheridan was reluctant to let others adapt his material and demonstrated a willingness to walk away. Some might call that stubborn or impractical; Sheridan sees it as trusting his instincts and sticking to his creative guns. He put Mayor of Kingstown in a drawer.
Over the next few years, Sheridan made a name for himself writing a trio of acclaimed films — Sicario (2015), Hell or High Water (2016) and Wind River (2017) — which he dubbed his “modern American frontier” trilogy.
Another of his scripts, Yellowstone, was likewise originally written as a movie. Sheridan pitched it as “The Godfather in Montana,” and it ended up in series development at HBO. Sheridan says then-programming president Michael Lombardo was supportive, but the rest of his team wasn’t.
“I thought Taylor was the real deal,” Lombardo says. “In a world of people who pose, he was writing what he knew, and he cared desperately about the show. The idea of doing a modern-classic Western was a great idea — we were always doing urban shows, and this felt fresh.”
The one thing they all agreed on was that Yellowstone needed a big star to play its uncompromising patriarch, John Dutton. Sheridan pitched Costner, but HBO executives “didn’t see it.”
“They said, ‘We want Robert Redford,’ ” Sheridan recalls. “They said, ‘If you can get us Robert Redford, we’ll greenlight the pilot.’ “
Being a can-do type of guy, Sheridan went to visit Robert Redford.
“I drive to Sundance and spend the day with him and he agrees to play John Dutton,” Sheridan says. “I call the senior vice president in charge of production and say, ‘I got him!’ ‘You got who?’ ‘Robert Redford.’ ‘What?!‘ ‘You said if I got Robert Redford, you’d greenlight the show.’ “
“And he says — and you can’t make this shit up — ‘We meant a Robert Redford type.’ ”
A crisis meeting was scheduled with the network vp (“whose name I remember, but I’m just not saying it”) to get to the bottom of HBO’s reluctance.
“We go to lunch in some snazzy place in West L.A.,” Sheridan says. “And [Yellowstone co-creator] John Linson finally asks: ‘Why don’t you want to make it?’ And the vp goes: ‘Look, it just feels so Middle America. We’re HBO, we’re avant-garde, we’re trendsetters. This feels like a step backward. And frankly, I’ve got to be honest, I don’t think anyone should be living out there [in rural Montana]. It should be a park or something.’ “
Sheridan later put some of those lines into Yellowstone‘s season two, when a New York magazine reporter disses Montana to Wes Bentley’s character, Jamie … and then Jamie murders her.
Sheridan, pictured here on the Yellowstone set in 2021.
Courtesy of Paramount Network
The executive’s coastal elite diss convinced Sheridan that HBO didn’t appreciate his story. During a notes call, Sheridan says, executives took issue with Dutton’s ferocious daughter, Beth (Kelly Reilly), who has since become a fan-favorite sensation.
“‘We think she’s too abrasive,’ ” Sheridan quotes. “‘We want to tone her down. Women won’t like her.’ They were wrong, because Beth says the quiet part out loud every time. When someone’s rude to you in a restaurant, or cuts you off in the parking lot, Beth says the thing you wish you’d said.”
Sheridan recalls, “So I said to them, ‘OK, everybody done? Who on this call is responsible for a scripted show that you guys have on the air? Oh, you’re not? Thanks.’ And I hung up. They never called back.”
That should have been the end of the Dutton family. HBO typically retains the rights to scripts it develops and rejects, partly to prevent what happened next from happening — a project they spent time and money developing becoming a global smash for a competitor.
“When the regime changed, Lombardo called me,” Sheridan says about the longtime HBO exec’s exit in 2016. “To his credit, he said, ‘I always believed in the show, but I could not get any support.’ His last act before they fired him was to give me the script back.”
As for that nameless vp, Sheridan says he left HBO and landed a production deal. After Yellowstone took off, he emailed Sheridan to say congratulations — and to pitch him a family drama.
Sheridan says he wrote back: “Great idea. It sounds just like Yellowstone.”
“I WAS REAL RICH FOR 45 MINUTES”
After coming up empty at HBO, Sheridan shopped Yellowstone around town. Everyone, he says, turned it down (“I took it to TNT … I took it to TBS!” he marvels). When Paramount finally bit, Sheridan bluntly warned executives they were going to spend a ton of money on production and would not have any creative control.
In 2018, Yellowstone debuted on the company’s niche cable channel, the Paramount Network. Within a few years, ratings exploded. “People couldn’t understand how a linear cable channel that no one can even find suddenly had the biggest show on television,” Sheridan says. “Because it has cowboys and this is supposed to be a dead genre, right? Of course, that’s not what the show is really about, that’s just the sugar on the pill.”
What Yellowstone is really about is a dying American way of life, a clash between traditions that respect the land and the unstoppable intrusion of modernity. Yet by the time he was making season three, Sheridan was starting to worry that his not-so-secret mission to save ranches in real life was doomed.
“I thought I had tricked people by showing a world worth protecting,” he says. “But when the show is over, that notion will go away and there will be a new shiny penny everyone watches. So I felt like I didn’t accomplish anything — which, for me, is really important. Sicario is entertaining, but it’s about something: the jumbled mess at the border.”
Sheridan went to the Four Sixes in late 2019 and pitched its then-owner, 81-year-old Anne Marion, on the idea of introducing her ranch into Yellowstone with a few scenes. He pledged to make the Four Sixes “the most famous ranch in America.”
Burnett asked if there would be any sex in the Four Sixes footage. “I said, ‘Well, one cowboy is sleeping with a vet tech, but don’t tell me that’s not happening already.’”
“And,’” Sheridan told her. “I would like to masturbate one stallion.”
Ms. Marion agreed, so long as she could pick the stallion.
Sheridan says this with a straight face and one tries not to snicker. This is normal life-on-the–ranch stuff, and it all ended up in Yellowstone (actor Jefferson White, who plays Jimmy, got the stallion honors).
Then, a couple of months later, a turn of fate: Burnett died and Sheridan received a call from the estate. The ranch was going up for sale, and might have been broken into pieces — the exact fate the Dutton family is always fighting to prevent. They offered Sheridan a chance to purchase the property.
“I said, ‘How much?’ They said, ‘It’s $350 million.’ And I’m like, ‘I’m about 330 short. But please, you thought enough to call me, will you give me two weeks?’ “
Sheridan says the opportunity changed his mind about expanding his overall deal with Paramount Global (then ViacomCBS). He valued his independence, preferring to be “a hired gun.” But to buy the ranch, he signed a new contract reportedly worth $200 million and wrangled some additional investors to bridge the gap.
“I was real rich for 45 minutes,” he says. “Then I was broke again. That was the trade.”
I give Sheridan a hypothetical: Your TV shows and your ranch are both hanging off a cliff. Which do you save?
“I do the shows for the ranch,” Sheridan says firmly.
But in trying to make so many shows so fast, didn’t you take on too much?
“I’ll tell you what,” Sheridan says. “It sure looked that way.”
“THERE IS NO COMPROMISING”
“The plan was I would Greg Berlanti it,” Sheridan says, referring to the prolific producer of The CW’s DC Universe shows. “I would write, cast and direct the pilots, and then we would bring in someone as a showrunner to run a writers room and I could check in and guide them.
“That plan failed,” he says. “There were some things that none of us foresaw.”
One of those is that, in Sheridan’s opinion, the writers hired for Tulsa King and the upcoming Lioness (which stars Zoe Saldaña, Morgan Freeman and Nicole Kidman) didn’t work out.
“My stories have a very simple plot that is driven by the characters as opposed to characters driven by a plot — the antithesis of the way television is normally modeled,” Sheridan says. “I’m really interested in the dirty of the relationships in literally every scene. But when you hire a room that may not be motivated by those same qualities — and a writer always wants to take ownership of something they’re writing — and I give this directive and they’re not feeling it, then they’re going to come up with their own qualities. So for me, writers rooms, they haven’t worked.”
Of course, Sheridan could have let it slide. Tulsa King’s showrunner was Terence Winter (who declined to comment), the four-time Emmy winner who wrote The Wolf of Wall Street and created Boardwalk Empire. Why not empower writers to take his shows in their own direction? You know, compromise.
“I spent the first 37 years of my life compromising,” Sheridan shoots back. “When I quit acting, I decided that I am going to tell my stories my way, period. If you don’t want me to tell them, fine. Give them back and I’ll find someone who does — or I won’t, and then I’ll read them in some freaking dinner theater. But I won’t compromise. There is no compromising.”
Sheridan hesitates. Maybe that’s too strong? “There is compromising on things like budget,” he adds, but then again maybe not. “You write a thing and it costs what it costs. I will not change a script to meet a budget. You read the scene [in his Yellowstone prequel 1883] where the wagons go across the river when you decided to green light it. So don’t pitch me an idea where we see them before the river and after the river. That’s not what I do. You read it, you had every chance to say no.”
This is where things get slippery in terms of pinning down Sheridan’s motives. The man says he makes shows to support his ranch, but he can’t help but care about his shows too. A lot. “I get paid whether they’re good or bad, but that’s not really winning,” he says. “’I’m one of those people that’s incapable doing something that’s not tethered to 100 percent of my passion. I cannot do ‘OK’ at a job.”
From left: Isabel May, who plays Elsa Dutton on 1883, with Sheridan.
Courtesy of Paramount Network
So Sheridan booted Winter as showrunner on Tulsa King and also started writing Lioness episodes himself — just as he writes all the episodes in the Yellowstone franchise (after early attempts at collaborating with others on that show, too). “If you don’t grow up in this [ranching] world, and if you’re not a history fanatic, how do you write 1883?” he asks. “How does a room do that? It doesn’t.”
Paramount Media Networks president and CEO chief Chris McCarthy says Sheridan is always welcome to be more hands-on. “You can’t teach or hope that someone cares more than Taylor,” he says. “So anytime that he wants to step in, it’s only to make it better and to push our partners to achieve greatness.”
The studio is seeking a new showrunner to take on the second season of Tulsa King (presumably, a very talented writer with modest job security expectations).
There are a couple of other showrunners (like White Lotus creator Mike White) who likewise prefer to write entire seasons solo, though it’s a stance that has been under scrutiny as it bumps up against the WGA’s efforts to convince studios to hire a minimum number of writers for each scripted show.
“The freedom of the artist to create must be unfettered,” Sheridan counters. “If they tell me, ‘You’re going to have to write a check for $540,000 to four people to sit in a room that you never have to meet,’ then that’s between the studio and the guild. But if I have to check in creatively with others for a story I’ve wholly built in my brain, that would probably be the end of me telling TV stories.”
Sheridan often writes in a one-room “cabinet” he built in Wyoming. He was always a fast writer, he says, but after building his script-generating isolation bunker, he was suddenly able to grind out episodes of hit TV shows at a phenomenal speed.
“I’ve written many episodes in eight to 10 hours,” he claims.
Does Paramount ever give you notes?
“No, sir.”
Do you ever watch an episode and think that you should have spent more time on it?
“No.”
And the script starts and ends with you? They go straight to the actors?
Sheridan considers this for a moment.
“They tell me there’s a story coordinator,” he says, “but I don’t know who that is.”
(Somewhere, a Yellowstone story coordinator reads this and sadly hangs their head.)
“Taylor writes scripts like you or I have a cup of coffee,” says Sheridan’s producing partner David Glasser. “He’s written 60 scripts for Yellowstone — most people don’t do that their entire career. It’s because of his excitement for the material.”
Living and working on a ranch has given Sheridan a creative edge, too. “When I lived in Los Angeles, everything I saw was the same and I didn’t learn anything in my day-to-day life,” Sheridan says. “Here, I get to experience so much. I heard 25 iconic pieces of dialogue today. Most of my great lines I heard someone else say, or some version of it. I’m banking story all the time.”
By early 2021, Sheridan was writing, producing and directing, cranking out ideas and episodes for multiple projects. Then, in April, Sheridan received a game-changing call from Paramount. The studio’s parent company had made an early blunder by selling the streaming rights to Yellowstone to Peacock. But they could stream a Yellowstone prequel series, and executives were excited by Sheridan’s pilot script for 1883.
“They say: ‘We’re changing everything! We’re launching this on our streaming service.’ And the first thing I said was: ‘You guys have a streaming service?’ They said, ‘Yeah, and we need this show.’ “
Paramount wanted Sheridan’s wagon train epic on Paramount+ by the end of the year. This was “impossible,” Sheridan says. He was prepping to direct two episodes of Mayor of Kingstown (he sold his shelved script to Paramount in 2020), and 1883 was going to require hands-on attention. “With this schedule, I’m in production on episode six on the day episode six is supposed to air,” he says. “How are we going to do that? Let’s pretend like we do this for a living.”
So Sheridan came back with a proposal.
“We’re going to shoot six-day weeks, sometimes seven,” he recalls telling the studio. “I’m going to bring on two other directors, but I’m still going to direct on every episode. I’ll bring in everyone myself. I’ll use as much local crew as I can, but I need the very best. I need an editorial team who’ll work 24 hours a day. You’ve got to get a VFX house and lock ’em down because every shot is an effects shot [to erase modern details]. And I don’t want to have one budget meeting, because you are now paying the ‘oh shit’ rate.”
Sheridan says this is an example of why his productions use assets he owns, or crew he’s close to, even when cheaper options might be available — he claims each decision is made for reasons of safety, convenience or competence under tight deadlines. Yet a recent Wall Street Journal report quoted production staffers expressing concern over excessive spending in leaked emails. The story followed Paramount’s $511 million first quarter loss in its streaming business even as Sheridan’s shows have been credited with adding millions of subscribers.
“It’s not double dipping,” Glasser contends. “Everything we do has a three-bid system, and Viacom has an audit team. Like shooting 1883 on Taylor’s ranch [for a reported $50,000 a week] was at a comparable price to the ranch next door. We rent a lot of ranches and know how much they cost.”
Another example: Sheridan says he uses his own horses because they can be relied upon to keep filming on track and have been trained to handle actors.
“They gave me a budget of $175 million [for 1883],” Sheridan says. “I thought it was going to be $225 with the rush costs. We did it for $169. And it was the biggest show.”
Sheridan looks proud of this, and with good cause. The premiere of 1883 drew 8 million viewers for the Paramount Network — the biggest cable TV debut in more than six years. Its availability on Paramount+ helped put the streamer on the map, and it opened a new franchise of Dutton family prequel shows. A success on every level.
There was just one thing.
With Sheridan jamming to pull off 1883, another project that also required his full attention had to be delayed: Yellowstone season five.
“I DON’T DO ‘F–K-YOU CAR CRASHES’”
Earlier this year, Costner shocked the Yellowstone-verse by deciding he wanted to exit the series. Paramount has since confirmed that the show will end with the upcoming second half of its fifth season.
Costner is leaving to focus on his own Western epic, a four-movie saga titled Horizon that he’s co-writing, directing and starring in. The actor had been trying to get Horizon made for 35 years and is expected to wrap the second film this week. Costner (who declined to comment for this story) has said the first installment might premiere at the Venice Film Festival in September.
The actor requested to work fewer and fewer days on Yellowstone the last few seasons to focus on his movies, which frustrated producers. Yet one source insists Costner kept “waiting on scripts” and that he repeatedly blocked out time to shoot, only to see his dates pushed. “Kevin’s been unfairly portrayed in this thing,” the source says. “How can you schedule something when there are no scripts? [Sheridan’s] doing eight other shows.”
Says Sheridan: “My last conversation with Kevin was that he had this passion project he wanted to direct. He and the network were arguing about when he could be done with Yellowstone. I said, ‘We can certainly work a schedule toward [his preferred exit date],’ which we did.”
There are ongoing discussions to try to convince Costner to film a few scenes to wrap his character, though the scripts are not yet complete. One would think Dutton having final conversations with his warring kids, Beth and Jamie, would be particularly helpful to set up the show’s home stretch.
“My opinion of Kevin as an actor hasn’t altered,” Sheridan says. “His creation of John Dutton is symbolic and powerful … and I’ve never had an issue with Kevin that he and I couldn’t work out on the phone. But once lawyers get involved, then people don’t get to talk to each other and start saying things that aren’t true and attempt to shift blame based on how the press or public seem to be reacting. He took a lot of this on the chin and I don’t know that anyone deserves it. His movie seems to be a great priority to him and he wants to shift focus. I sure hope [the movie is] worth it — and that it’s a good one.
“I’m disappointed,” Sheridan adds. “It truncates the closure of his character. It doesn’t alter it, but it truncates it.”
Sheridan hints that John Dutton was never going to be around for the very end of the show, and that the conclusion of Yellowstone is unchanged from his original movie script. So Dutton will likely be — in the parlance of the series — “taken to the train station.” Or perhaps, I suggest, meet his fate in “a fuck-you car crash” (a phrase made famous after Grey’s Anatomy creator Shonda Rhimes killed off Patrick Dempsey’s character amid behind-the-scenes tension).
“I was killed in a fuck-you car crash!” Sheridan points out.
Oh, right: When Sheridan quit his modest role on Sons of Anarchy over being, as he saw it, woefully underpaid, his character was run over by a van.
“I don’t do fuck-you car crashes,” Sheridan says. “Whether [Dutton’s fate] inflates [Costner’s] ego or insults is collateral damage that I don’t factor in with regard to storytelling.”
Kevin Costner in Yellowstone.
Paramount Network/Courtesy Everett Collection
Speaking of which, another anonymous claim was that Costner had grown uncomfortable with the direction of his character and that Sheridan told him to “stick to acting.” Other actors on Sheridan’s shows have notably heaped praise on the writer and describe instances where he shows empathy for performers that reflects decades spent on the other side of the camera (when nervously auditioning for 1923, Julia Schlaepfer recalls Sheridan telling her “Hey, I’m an actor, all I want you to do is be you. Drop any notion of the character you ever had because you, to me, are Alex, you have all the qualities of this character, so just be yourself [and] I’ll read with you”). Sheridan does like his dialogue to be performed as precisely as written, but that’s hardly unusual.
“I never had that conversation with Kevin,” Sheridan says. “There was a time in season two when he was very upset and said the character wasn’t going in the direction he wanted. I said, ‘Kevin, you do remember that I told you this is essentially The Godfather on the largest ranch in Montana? Are you that surprised that the Godfather is killing people?’ What he’s clung to is [Dutton’s] commitments to his family and way of life. Dutton’s big failing is not evolving with the times — not finding different revenue streams [for the ranch]. Kevin felt season two was deviating from that, and I don’t know that he was wrong. In season three, we steered back into it.”
Sheridan adds: “And I recall him winning a Golden Globe last year for his performance, so I think it’s working.”
Asked if he could have done anything to prevent the situation from blowing up, Sheridan looks exasperated, like This reporter ain’t getting it.
“I didn’t do anything to begin with!” he says. “I don’t dictate the schedule. I don’t determine when things start filming. I don’t determine when things air. Those decisions are made by people way above me. My sphere of control is the content — that’s it. No production of mine has ever waited on me. Believe me, I begged [for more time] with 1883. I begged with 1923. Begged. Nope, ‘Airdate locked; for what we pay you, figure it out.’ And I don’t stand in a corner and go, ‘I’m not going to do it.’ “
Paramount chief McCarthy sees things a bit differently. He cites Costner’s “very tight window” and downplays the role of the studio’s streaming ambitions and scheduling moves. “We had a lead talent we adore, and [Costner’s] shooting four features back to back,” McCarthy says. “This Yellowstone chapter is closing sooner than we all wanted, but we feel good with where it’s going to end.”
Paramount announced that Yellowstone will return in November, which looks highly unlikely given the writers strike. (Sheridan insists he’s dutifully pencils down at the moment, and that he broadly supports the WGA’s efforts.) In a bit of good news for fans, however, Sheridan suggests he might make more than the previously reported six final episodes.
“If I think it takes 10 episodes to wrap it up, they’ll give me 10,” Sheridan says. “It’ll be as long as it needs to be.”
“WHAT DOES ‘GOD COMPLEX’ MEAN?”
Paramount’s hope is that Yellowstone isn’t really ending. Oscar winner Matthew McConaughey is in late-stage negotiations for a Yellowstone follow-up, a “new chapter” in the saga that will air on the streaming service (McConaughey is currently filming another project and declined to comment).
“He seems like a natural fit,” Sheridan says. “We had a few conversations over the years, and spitballed a few ideas. Then he started watching Yellowstone and responded to it. He was like, ‘I want to do that.’ And by ‘that’ he meant diving into a raw world clashing up against the modern world. And then I said, ‘Buddy, that we can do.’ “
Yet Sheridan surprisingly hints that the spinoff might lean heavily, if not entirely, on a new cast and location. It’s tough to imagine Sheridan leaving behind a character like Beth, whom he clearly adores. But when asked specifically about shifting Yellowstone’s surviving characters to the new project, Sheridan replies, “My idea of a spinoff is the same as my idea of a prequel — read into that what you will.”
Meaning it’s a stand-alone story?
Sheridan nods. “There are lots of places where a way of life that existed for 150 years is slamming against a new way of life, but the challenges are completely different. There are a lot of places you can tell this story.”
Still, the project is in its early days. Sheridan says he has only “the broadest strokes” of the spinoff worked out.
He’s also planning several more Yellowstone prequels, which have not yet been announced. Paramount executives should brace themselves, as Sheridan expects these titles to become more expensive at a time when streamers are tightening their belts. By one estimate, Paramount is spending $500 million a year making Sheridan’s shows, which tend to cost at least $10 million to $15 million per episode.
“[The prequels are] time capsules of life in Montana as a microcosm of the world as a whole,” he says. “They’re big spectacles, and the more that you move into the modern era, the bigger that spectacle becomes. I know these are huge bets Paramount makes on me every time. I’m asking them to give me Game of Thrones season six money for what is essentially a pilot every year, and that’s a big ask. As long as I do my job well, and people don’t bore of the genre, I think there will be enough for many more [prequels] — three or four. Chris McCarthy trusts me, because I haven’t been wrong yet.”
Yet another Yellowstone-verse title, Sheridan’s previously announced Four Sixes series, is on hold given his newly acquired front-row seat to the sensitivities involved with the property. “That, for a number of reasons, needs a unique level of special care because this is a real place with real families working here,” he says. “You have to respect the lineage. I’ve told [the studio] to be patient.”
He also has two other upcoming titles: the historical Western anthology series Lawmen: Bass Reeves (starring David Oyelowo as the first Black U.S. marshal) and Land Man (starring Billy Bob Thornton as a Texas oilman).
There was one more recent claim about Sheridan in the press. An insider was quoted saying he has “developed a God complex.” So, have you?
“I wouldn’t think that, no, I don’t …” Sheridan pauses. “But you can find people — most of them line producers — who would feel that way. What does ‘God complex’ mean? I’m very blunt with every single person — the production staff, the studio, the network. I said, ‘Look, I invented this thing that I wrote down on paper and I’ve been entrusted to make it into a story that this network goes and sells. Your job is to try and get me there under budget.’ I don’t know that anyone ever said, ‘Yay, that TV show that got canceled after season one came in under budget.’ ”
He continues: “So if I’m parking 20 million people in front of a television, if I’m beating NFL Sunday Night Football routinely, I think the fact I wanted four cameras and worked late into Friday — I don’t think that’s a bad trade. My one rule with line producers and production people is: You don’t get to tell me ‘no,’ you get to tell me how much ‘yes’ costs, and then I decide where to pull that money from. It’s easy to tell me, ‘Taylor, you cannot have a helicopter for two days.’ That’s not the deal. I’m going to get a helicopter for two days. I’m going to swap this location to over here, and then I’m going to shoot thishere, and I’ll squeeze this out there, and then it will end up costing the same amount of money. So if you want to call that a God complex, great.”
Sheridan considers. “And, by the way — and this is going to sound arrogant —”
No, please, go ahead.
“— but I don’t really give a shit what a line producer or some physical production person thinks. I care a lot about craft services and set decorators and assistant camera operators and people that are working their asses off for way longer than I work — and I work 16 to 18 hours a day. They’re doing it for $35 an hour. I really care what they think.”
“YOU WANT TO FIND BEAUTY SOMEWHERE”
The things Sheridan cares about — and what he doesn’t — sometimes align with his protagonists, who likewise tend to be determined bosses who are used to having things done their way. They feel deeply for their family, close friends and respective missions in life — never mind other people’s opinions.
Take Sheridan’s feelings about the Emmys. Sheridan has never been nominated, and his shows have been largely snubbed. Asked if he cares about winning the respect of his industry peers, Sheridan tells the backstory of his movie Wind River, which highlighted a grossly unjust law enforcement loophole.
“[Wind River] actually changed a law, where you can now be prosecuted if you’re a U.S. citizen for committing rape on an Indian reservation, and there’s now a database for missing murdered Indigenous women,” he says. “So keep your fucking award. Who’s going to remember I won an award in 10 years? But that law had a profound impact. All social change begins with the artist, and that’s the responsibility you have.”
Sheridan also cares more about romance than his gruff cowboy image might suggest. Whether it’s Beth and Rip in Yellowstone, or Spencer and Alexandra in 1923, Sheridan writes aching heartfelt relationships that seem downright taboo at a time when TV dramas are full of dysfunctional marriages and disposable hookups.
“I don’t want conflict in my own relationship, so I don’t like to explore that in stories,” he says. “There’s extreme conflict in my stories, but there has to be something to strive for — you want to find beauty somewhere. Everyone has been in a bad relationship. Who wants to go through the PTSD of watching that? I’d rather watch the fantasy of the relationship we all want.”
Then there’s the whole conservative label, which has never really fit. Yellowstone was unfairly branded a red-state show for years (it’s popular everywhere). Now Sheridan is amused to hear there’s been right-wing backlash declaring his shows “too woke” after Yellowstone introduced an animal rights activist character and 1923 devastatingly explored the historical abuse of Indigenous people. He didn’t see the online outrage himself since he stays off social media (“Let ’em hate!”).
Taylor Sheridan
Photographed by Emerson Miller
Yet his most politics-scrambling stance is his obvious passion for the environment. It’s one thing to advocate for the natural world like half of Hollywood does, quite another to put your overall deal on the line for a sizable chunk of the great outdoors. “This ranch looks like it did 150 years ago, and it’s a constant fight,” he says. “Business-wise, it was a terrible decision. But they’re just not making any more of this and someone’s got to take care of it. I felt a duty.”
To keep his operation thriving, Sheridan is avoiding John Dutton’s mistake and opening new revenue streams. In Austin bars, you can find the new Four Sixes-brand beer. Watch Yellowstone and you can see Beth touting the huge success of Four Sixes direct-to-consumer beef (“You sell out?!” she exclaimed), which actually launched right before the episode aired. Sheridan once pledged to make Four Sixes the most famous ranch in America. He just might become a tycoon in the process.
“The real impetus behind Yellowstone was always that if you’re the owner of an amount of land that vast, you’re kind of a king, and morality doesn’t apply,” he says. “I was surprised by the amount of political influence that we have [with the ranch]. I don’t know why I was surprised — I wrote it into Yellowstone. But what we do or don’t do can influence a market. So even though I wrote about John Dutton having that kind of influence, I never really fathomed myself having it.”
A final benefit of the mega-ranch: From Sheridan’s porch, the nearest public road is maybe a half-mile away. It’s a distance that might come in handy just in case any of his comments above rub someone the wrong way.
“If someone stands at my front gate and screams through a bullhorn and says what a piece of shit I am,” he says, “I still can’t hear them!”
“You don’t get to tell me ‘No.’ You get to tell me how much ‘yes’ costs.”
Photographed by Emerson Miller
This story first appeared in the June 21 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine. Click here to subscribe.
It is comically easy to make a passable shoegaze song with the right pedals and proper settings, but writing a great shoegaze song remains fiendishly difficult. Slowdive remain masters at this evanescent art. “Kisses,” the lead single to their upcoming album Everything Is Alive, and their first new music since 2017’s self-titled, is more delicate than anything on that album, as well as more openly romantic. Neil Halstead and Rachel Goswell sing hazily about the prospect of a fresh start—“Maybe there’s a car there/Driving away from here/Taking all the ghosts, the hurt”—crooning the words “kisses/born desert sun” on the hook, although it sounds more like “kisses under the sun.” As their voices swirl creamily together, the invitation sounds as rejuvenating and full of promise as the open sky.
Directed by Megan Griffiths and written by Eliza Flug, Year of the Fox shares a tale of haunting class privilege through the voyeuristic eyes and narration of its principal character, Ivy (Sarah Jeffery). She’s biracial, adopted, and about to be 18. Set in the late 1990s with a soundtrack of predominate hits of the time, this coming-of-age drama contains many layers about entering adulthood, especially in the myopic environs of mountain town wealth.
Ivy grew up in an uber-rich playground tucked away in the high hills of Aspen, Colorado. She was privileged in her well-healed and self-entitled community. As she sets the stage of her life in her monotone and controlled voice, Ivy describes her entrance into adulthood as a shattered reality, which begins when her father, Huxley (Jake Webber), and her mother, Paulene (Jane Adams) divorce, even though they are an odd couple. Over a year, Ivy travels back and forth from Aspen to Seattle, Washington, where her mother settles after the divorce. Her father begins a destructive course of action to prepare Ivy, she thinks, for the future, claiming to support her idea of attending art school.
It is a bizarre sense of reality ensconced and camouflaged in nature with fishing, camping, a jeep dubbed “The Beast,” odd gifts, and his desire for social prowess disguised as a loving father. Although Ivy has an age-appropriate group of friends, including bestie and ice skating partner Layla (Lexi Simonsen), she begins to entertain life as an adult. Huxley’s new girlfriend, Sibi (Arden Myrin), is his fun as he describes her. Ivy and Layla are the next generation to this underbelly of Aspen’s privileged and self-entitlement community of parties, drugs, and sexual deviancy, misled by the idea of love with a “silver fox.” This leads Ivy into a trap she did not expect.
“Ivy and Layla are the next generation to this underbelly of Aspen’s privileged…”
The acting throughout Year of the Fox is quite good. Webber handles his role flawlessly, and his character lingers with you beyond the screen. Huxley is a monster, but he makes the man almost understandable. Adams, with her chain-smoking and messy gray hair, perfectly portrays the toll of being in, then out, of such a high level of prestige and power. She’s a gift, yet, her character also shares her life lessons on men beyond her husband’s atrocities, constantly referring to Huxley’s ability to shine a bright spotlight until he shuts it off—an unfortunate dramatic, painful reality.
Jeffery conveys precisely how Ivy always has been an outsider looking in. She navigates the world she grew up in as if a stranger, which helps sells this drama’s ending very well. Simonsen is terrific as well, with her and Jeffery sharing believable chemistry as friends.
Year of the Fox maintains a strong level of acting by each cast member. Griffiths and Flug detail actions that could only play in the life of the extremely wealthy. The filmmakers observe the people who are in it that society, especially in affluent mountain and resort towns, with a discerning eye. The best moment of clarity comes when Sibi grabs the phone from Huxley to try and explain to Ivy that accepting her father’s behavior is understanding that men have particular needs. A character such as Huxley seems omnipresent in modern times, and his narcissistic needs are all too familiar and posed as life lessons for membership in elite society.
“This isn’t something that happens to funeral directors very often,” Coffey said Tuesday.
The minibus was carrying the group of seniors from Dauphin and the surrounding area to a casino Thursday, when it went into the path of a semi-trailer truck on the Trans-Canada Highway near the town of Carberry, some 190 kilometres to the south.
Health officials have said 10 others on the bus, including the driver, remained in hospital. Five were in critical condition.
Staff at the funeral home knew everyone who was on the bus, Coffey said. They saw them at church and at funerals. Some are related to the victims.
Story continues below advertisement
“It’s an intimate connection,” Coffey said.
When word of the crash spread, he said, his staff stepped up to offer their time. Two cancelled their vacation plans.
Dauphin residents continue to seek support after horrific crash
Funeral directors from across the province and the country also reached out to offer help, he said.
While Coffey isn’t worried about capacity at the funeral home, he said it will be important to work over the coming days and weeks to make sure the funerals don’t overlap.
Many people in the community will want to go to multiple funerals, he said.
The real challenge will come with the waves of grief.
“It’s the emotional connection to the people and the tragedy itself, the event, which plays on the staff, the community and the families that we are dealing with,” Coffey said.
Story continues below advertisement
RCMP said they plan to release the names of those who died at a press conference Thursday in Dauphin. Manitoba Premier Heather Stefanson and first responders who were at the crash are scheduled to attend.
Manitoba crash update: Answers could take ‘weeks or months’, investigators say
Mayor David Bosiak said a memorial service for residents would be held Thursday night at a community hall.
Families of the victims wanted the event, he said.
The mayor spoke with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Tuesday over the phone. A readout of the conversation said they discussed the tight-knit nature of Prairie town communities and how they have come together in times of loss.
“The prime minister also shared wishes of strength and perseverance to those still recovering in the hospital,” the readout said.
“The prime minister thanked the mayor for his steadfast leadership and compassion during this incredibly difficult time.”
Our thoughts continue to be with everyone affected by last week’s tragic crash near Carberry, Manitoba. Today, as his community grieves, I expressed my sincere condolences to the Mayor of Dauphin – and I told him that we’re here to help people through this painful time.
Image Credit: London Entertainment / SplashNews.com
Saint West is blinging out his baby teeth! The 7-year-old was seen rocking Louis Vuitton tooth gems on his upper incisors, along with a gold nameplate necklace adorned with diamonds. The tooth gems were shaped like the Louis Vuitton logo.
Kim Kardashian shared a glimpse of Saint’s look on her Instagram Story before heading to the Paris Men’s Fashion Week show. Saint flashed those pearly whites for his mom’s photo. Kim sat in the front row at the fashion show and filmed videos of the celeb-filled event that took place in Paris. Zendaya, Beyonce, Jay-Z, Rihanna, A$AP Rocky, and more stars also attended the A-list fashion show. This marked Pharrell’s first Louis Vuitton fashion show as the new creative director of menswear for the brand.
Kim looked stylish in a printed crop top and leggings for Pharrell’s show. She also wore a large fanny pack and a fur coat with her hair falling in loose waves around her. Saint didn’t get to go to the actual fashion show, but he made sure to show his support!
Saint has been growing up before our very eyes. The youngster is all about soccer these days, both playing the sport and watching it. Back in March 2023, Kim took Saint and his friends to the Arsenal vs. Sporting Lisbon game in London. Kim is frequently seen attending Saint’s soccer games and being the ultimate soccer mom back home in California.
Kim Kardashian taking a photo with son Saint West at a Lakers game. (London Entertainment / SplashNews.com)
The 7-year-old is gearing up for his feature film debut later this year. Saint, along with his mom and big sister North West, will voice roles in the upcoming Paw Patrol: The Mighty Movie. Saint’s role is unknown at the moment, but we do know that North is voicing a Pomeranian named Mini, a nod to the family’s own Pomeranians. Kim is reprising her role as Dolores from the first film. The film is set to be released on September 29, 2023.
Vice President Kamala Harris said Tuesday she believes abortion rights will be secured for Americans via federal legislation put forth by the U.S. Congress. While appearing on MSNBC’s “The ReidOut” for a discussion of abortion rights in America, Harris spoke of Congress’ ability to essentially undo that U.S. Supreme Court decision.
“Ultimately, this is an issue that will be resolved by federal legislation that codifies, which means ‘puts into law,’ the protections of Roe [v. Wade],” Harris said. Watch the full video below:
.@VP Kamala Harris on reproductive rights: “Ultimately, this is an issue that will be resolved by federal legislation that codifies, which means puts into law, the protections of Roe.” #TheReidOutpic.twitter.com/dgS2d7V1s5
The interview took place as part of a special marking the one-year anniversary of Dobbs v. Jackson, a Supreme Court decision that overturned the landmark 1973 abortion rights decision of Roe v. Wade. Harris told Reid and the show’s other panelists the issue will be resolved federally, but cautioned voters to continue to focus on local and state elections as well.
“Ultimately, the United States Congress can put back in place what the United States Supreme Court took,” Harris continued. “The United States Supreme Court took a constitutional right. The United States Congress has the power to put in place a protection of that individual privacy right that all Americans should be entitled to.”
To mark the June 24 anniversary, Senate Democrats plan to push legislation centered on reproductive rights, according to NBC. The bills are extremely unlikely to pass, as they require the consent of all 100 senators, but are being pushed in an attempt to put pressure on Republican elected officials to speak on the issue.
A USA Today poll released Sunday found that support for legal abortion has risen in the past year following the overturning of Roe.
At the top of MSNBC’s “All In With Chris Hayes” on Tuesday, Hayes began with a look into the news that Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s troubled son, has reached a plea deal with the Department of Justice, bringing an end to a federal investigation that has lasted more than 5 years.
But Hayes, who did express criticism of the younger Biden’s conduct, was focused on the fact that Republicans have been “obsessed” with him for years, an obsession Hayes dismissed as “sheer sadism” and nothing more than “an attempt to wield a son’s addiction against the father for political purposes.”
Watch the video here now, and read on if you aren’t able to watch.
.@chrislhayes: The ritual humiliation of Hunter Biden—a mainstay of the right-wing media—is an attempt to wage a sort of psychological warfare upon the president. Joe Biden has no control over the actions of his adult son—his sole surviving son—who he obviously loves deeply. pic.twitter.com/7V9xpOohIG
— All In with Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris) June 21, 2023
In case you need a refresher, Hunter Biden has been under investigation for a variety of alleged crimes since 2018, an investigation ordered under the Trump administration and continued under the Biden administration. It’s convoluted but the gist is that in the mid-2010s, Hunter Biden relapsed in his drug and alcohol addiction while also working for foreign companies in positions that clearly traded on his closeness to American centers of power. His behavior during that period then became public because of leaked videos and other information documenting his struggle.
His father has never been implicated in any wrongdoing but Hunter Biden’s problems became a fixation for conservatives attempting to draw equivalence between Biden and Donald Trump, and the whole thing has been the subject of speculation and baseless conspiracy theories involving Ukraine, alongside the real questions regarding wrongdoing or unethical behavior. He has reached a deal in which he’ll plead guilty to tax evasion, and will avoid being charged for unlawful purchase of a firearm. Read more about it here.
Kicking off his remarks, Hayes noted that President Biden has specifically not interfered in the investigation. Biden, Hayes explained, did what all other presidents have done — fired all the U.S. attorneys and replaced them, but he made exceptions for two of them conducting investigations ordered by Trump.
“He kept John Durham. Remember that guy? Durham was allowed to stay on and complete what was essentially a Trump-ordered wild goose chase to bring the ‘deep state’ to account, a goose chase which came up with basically nothing,” Hayes said. “And then there was David Weiss. David Weiss is the Delaware U.S. attorney, and he is the man who launched the probe into Hunter Biden in 2018. The new President Joe Biden left Weiss there in Delaware, so as not to interfere in any way in the ongoing investigation of his own son.”
Hayes then explained where things stand with Hunter Biden, adding, “it’s been a remarkable road to get to this point. I mean, the first time the Department of Justice has brought charges against the child of a sitting president. And it appears from what we know, and from the timeline, that federal prosecutors dealt with this case very similarly to their investigation into ex-President Trump. Which is to say at every point, up and down the chain of command, they went out of their way, bending over backwards so as not to appear partisan or biased or unfair.”
Hayes noted the bombshell Washington Post story published Sunday that details how the FBI and Attorney General Merrick Garland apparently resisted even investigating Trump for his role fomenting the Jan. 6 insurrection. Supposedly due to “a weariness about appearing partisan institutional caution and clashes over how much evidence was sufficient to investigate the actions of Trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace.”
“This probe of Hunter Biden has dragged on for five years. That’s a long time, a sweeping investigation involving federal prosecutors, FBI agents, IRS officials, it has resulted in charges that experts say are rarely prosecuted. That gun charge in particular, prohibiting a drug addict from owning a weapon, a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges has been used in high profile cases where the underlying conduct doesn’t violate any obvious federal criminal statute. Notably Weiss did not bring any charges related to Hunter Biden’s dealing with foreign entities, following years, years of accusations from Republicans about his ties to China and Ukraine,” Hayes said.
“And again, presumably they looked at that stuff in the five years they were going through it all, right? Of course, Republicans began moving the goalposts almost immediately after the news broke,” Hayes continued, noting unhinged comments by Donald Trump and a Republican congressman complaining about the plea deal and accusing Joe Biden of being some kind of crime boss.
“Now, the right wing attacks on the Bidens, particularly on Hunter Biden, have generally been in bad faith. I will say there has been some legitimate criticism, particularly of Hunter Biden’s work for a Ukrainian energy company called Burisma. An appointment that certainly had the appearance and to my mind likely substance of a foreign entity clearly attempting to just purchase access to the then-Vice President United States or to curry favor. And Hunter Biden obviously should not accept to that role. But he’s made a lot of bad judgment calls over the years. It’s not just that one. And I think both Hunter Biden and his father would agree, largely related to his lifelong struggles with drug and alcohol use,” Hayes said.
But, Hayes continued, “all the attacks on Hunter Biden are of course, just a way to hurt his father.”
“If you watch right wing media, I don’t know how much you do it, they are obsessed with Hunter Biden, just sort of engaged in a kind of ritual humiliation of him, a mainstay of their programming, and it is all frankly and clearly an attempt to wage a sort of psychological warfare upon the president,” Hayes said. “Joe Biden has no control over the the actions of his adult son. We all know that, I think the people pressing these ridiculous attacks know that. His sole surviving son we should note, who he obviously loves deeply.”
As evidence Hayes played the leaked voicemail from 2018 in which Joe Biden can be heard expressing his love and support for Hunter Biden and urging him to get help, a recording, Hayes noted, that Republicans tried to use in attacks on Biden.
“I would bet good money that the majority of people that just heard that right now, have heard it, has had someone they loved who was in a similar spot as Hunter Biden, dealing with substance issues, and can relate to that. Maybe even admire the way that Joe Biden spoke to his son. Hunter Biden thankfully did get help, and credits his family for never giving up on him,” Hayes continued.
“I think today’s result of the long long investigation into Hunter Biden is ultimately good for the rule of law and for justice, even though I think honestly, they probably went out of their way to charge him. But no one — no one — should lose sight of what this was all about. The sheer sadism of an attempt to wield a son’s addiction against the father for political purposes. That’s what has animated this entire enterprise from the beginning,” Hayes concluded.
Last October, when Roger Waters brought his “This Is Not a Drill” tour through Austin, Texas, he also took the time to record a nearly three-hour appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast. These are typically rambling affairs, guided by the host’s idiosyncratic curiosities, and about halfway through, following a riff by Waters about nuclear weapons, foreign languages and Noam Chomsky, Rogan changed the subject. He said he had to ask Waters — the former lead lyricist, bassist and co-lead vocalist for Pink Floyd — about the synchronicity that arises from watching “The Wizard of Oz” while listening to “The Dark Side of the Moon.”
This phenomenon is sometimes called “The Dark Side of the Rainbow”: If you start the album at just the right time, the music and lyrics uncannily align with the movie’s visuals. Some coincidences are lyrical, as when Dorothy runs away from home at the line “No one told you when to run.” Some are tonal, as when the tornado sequence seems practically choreographed to Clare Torry’s wordless vocals in “The Great Gig in the Sky” — rising to a frenzy as the twister rolls in and then shifting to dreaminess just as Dorothy is knocked unconscious.
Click play to listen to the synced audio.
tk tk
In a spectacular conclusion, the album’s closing heartbeats play as Dorothy listens to the Tin Woodman’s chest. These and many other conjunctions, from the vivid to the subtle, produce mesmerizing and surreal effects that have dazzled generations of pot smokers, Rogan apparently included.
“I don’t believe it for a minute,” Waters said, “but I like the story.”
“Yeah, I don’t even want to investigate that — I want it to be true,” Rogan replied. (Journalistic principle compelled me to email Nelson’s publicist, who wrote back four minutes later to say, “It doesn’t sound true.”)
Rogan went on: “I’ve watched ‘The Wizard of Oz,’ listening to ‘The Dark Side of the Moon,’ while high on marijuana. And if it’s not on purpose, it is a cosmic coincidence because it’s kind of amazing. It’s kind of amazing how it just flows.”
I happened to stumble across a reference to this exchange online, but there was little chance it would escape my attention for long. That’s because I have a strange connection to the phenomenon: Nearly three decades ago, I wrote the first article about it when I was a summer intern at The Journal Gazette in my hometown, Fort Wayne, Ind. In recent months, as various music magazines and websites have been putting together packages about “The Dark Side of the Moon” in honor of its 50th anniversary, I have received a surge in interview requests about this article I wrote when I was 19, which has become an absurd footnote to my career as a national-security and legal journalist.
The link has been a recurring intrusion into my thoughts for years. Alerts I set up to deliver email to my inbox when someone writes about one of my New York Times articles also bring word of new references to that old Journal Gazette piece. And if those fail, friends and family text or email me whenever they see it mentioned in the wild. Every year or so, another co-worker stopping by my desk or a government source I’m meeting for a drink brings it up with a chuckle. At some point, somebody stuck the fact into a brief Wikipedia entry about me, and since then whenever I give a talk about something like surveillance or drone strikes or presidential power, people introducing me have often mentioned it — much to the audience’s amusement.
I didn’t come up with the idea of pairing these two works. I’m not the inventor of “The Dark Side of the Rainbow.” But in a strange sort of accident, I played a key early role in its becoming a cultural phenomenon. Before my article, “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” was just a word-of-mouth thing on an early internet message board. Hardly anyone knew about it, and those who did had no idea who came up with the idea or where it started.
Because the provenance of “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” is murky, my article has come to stand in for its unknown origin story. But I merely helped popularize an idea that was already starting to circulate, one that most likely would have found its way to wider recognition with or without my involvement. If I hadn’t written that article, someone else would have. And yet, it was me who did. For better or worse, I was in the right place at the right time — and able to bear witness to one of the first intrusions of internet culture into mainstream American life.
When I arrived at college as a freshman in the fall of 1994, I discovered that my dorm room was wired for an Ethernet connection. At the time, most people, if they had internet access at all, had dial-up modems. And the internet you connected to remained in its infancy: There wasn’t much to see yet on what we still called the World Wide Web. I was more intrigued by the other forms of communication my connection gave me access to: email and Usenet, a message-board system created in 1979 and made up of “newsgroups” for countless topics. Among the Usenet groups I started following was one called alt.music.pink-floyd.
I had been into Pink Floyd since middle school, when my older brother gave me a T-shirt from their “A Momentary Lapse of Reason” tour and used a dual cassette deck to dub me copies of their albums. In June 1994, just before graduating from high school, I drove with some friends to Indianapolis and, from the rafters of the Hoosier Dome, watched the band live for the first time. I mostly listened to alternative rock in those days, but Pink Floyd’s Usenet group had a hold on me. The band had so much history, and such a deep discography, that its forum was more active and engaging than any other boards I read.
The Usenet group’s archives from that era appear to have been lost. But in my recollection, “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” reached the forum as second- or thirdhand information already: Someone posted that he had heard from some people in Los Angeles that “Dark Side” matched up with the first half of “Oz” in a weird and interesting way. In April 1995, I decided to try it out. I rented a VHS tape of the movie from a video store near campus, located in a former parking garage that had been converted into a ramped mini-mall. Some friends and I crammed onto a nasty yellow sofa, under posters of Kurt Cobain and “Reservoir Dogs.” We pushed the tape into the VCR, muted the TV and hit play on the stereo. (Everyone agrees that you’re supposed to time the start of the music to the roars of the MGM lion, but there is some disagreement about how: We started with the first roar, but a consensus has since developed favoring the third.)
For the next 43 minutes, gasps of recognition ensued as the two works seemed to merge and play off each other. The synchronicities started mildly, like “All you touch and all you see” coming when Dorothy grabs a farmhand’s arm, and got better, like the alarms from “Time” blaring as the film cuts to the evil Miss Gulch coming to get Toto, and Professor Marvel urging Dorothy to go home at “Home, home again.” After the tornado scene we were fully into it, grooving as Dorothy opened the door into Technicolor Oz just as the cash-register noises kicked off “Money.”
In the next track, the black-dressed Wicked Witch appeared and confronted the blue-dressed Dorothy to the lyrics “Black … and blue.”
During “Brain Damage,” the Scarecrow — in need of a brain — flops around as Waters sings about lunatics. The two works integrated in so many ways that it was jarring when the album ended but the movie continued.
That summer, I landed a features-writing internship at The Journal Gazette, temporarily joining a small staff that produced a page in the entertainment section aimed at Gen X readers. A big part of the job was pitching offbeat stories, and the editor liked my idea of writing about the mash-up. So once again I rented the movie and reproduced the experience, this time taking notes. I asked on Usenet if anyone knew its origin but got no useful reply. The band’s publicist at Columbia Records ignored several voice mail messages and a note I sent by fax machine asking for comment.
I was skeptical that there could be any rational explanation for why the two works synchronized. “After all, it’s hard to imagine Roger Waters, Dave Gilmour & Co. painstakingly writing their music to the movie’s timing,” I wrote. “It’s even harder to imagine that a band so gimmickry-minded (it stuck a blinking LED light on the CD packaging of its latest release, ‘Pulse,’ for example) would keep quiet for 22 years if it had done it purposefully.”
People told me that the morning the article ran, they heard D.J.s on a classic-rock station in Fort Wayne talking about it on the air. But newspapers were not yet putting their content online, so there was little way for it to find an audience outside of northeastern Indiana. That changed when I went back to campus for my sophomore year, learned some HTML and made a home page for myself. I added a separate page where I pasted a copy of my article. I shared that page on the Usenet group and added it to a Pink Floyd “Web ring” — a system in which people with related pages linked to one another. I put one of those little counters at the bottom of the page. I didn’t expect much to come of it, because no one really visited the home page of a random college sophomore.
But within months, the counter began ticking up. The article page was logging hundreds, then thousands, and eventually tens of thousands of visitors. I began to notice that over on the Usenet group, users were occasionally directing newcomers to my article. Soon, several other fans made their own web pages about it. Gradually, and then all at once, “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” spread. The following year, in the spring of 1997, several D.J.s at rock stations in major markets — first in Boston and then New York — mentioned it on air, citing discussion on the internet. That prompted an MTV News segment about what Kurt Loder called a “mysterioso linkage” that “for the past couple of years the internet has been buzzing with.” This was followed by a wave of articles in bigger papers like The New York Daily News, The Washington Post and The Baltimore Sun.
The phenomenon had finally gone viral — it only took two years.
A thing to understand about the mash-up is that it wasn’t just a big album and a popular movie. Because “The Wizard of Oz” aired on television so many times in the second half of the 20th century, the Library of Congress estimated in 2000 that it had been seen by more viewers than any other film in history. “The Dark Side of the Moon” was one of the best-selling albums of not just the 1970s but of all time, exhibiting unmatched staying power: It holds the record for the album with the most weeks on the Billboard 200 chart — making a 981st appearance just last month.
Part of the enigma of “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” is that even today nobody knows its origin. Back in 1995, my effort to figure out who first did it went nowhere, and no one has made a credible claim to being its originator in the decades since then. We are left to speculate why anyone would have thought to try putting the two works together — or if it was instead born of a coincidence itself. Perhaps the album was playing in the background when someone channel surfed to the movie on television and noticed what was happening — as hard as this is to imagine, it’s at least statistically more likely to happen with two of the most popular mass entertainments of the last century.
Other technological forces were at work in the early ’90s, making the pairing more likely to be discovered. As a practical matter, the experience could not be replicated until the arrival of the VCR. And since being off a few seconds in either direction would ruin the effect, it also helped to have the album available on compact discs, which played straight through without needing to be flipped over like records or cassettes. And then, of course, there was the internet, where a strange rumor sourced to some people in Los Angeles could wend its way to a college freshman in Boston.
Until recently, it had been many years since I rewatched “The Dark Side of the Rainbow.” But inspired by the spate of interview requests, I decided to try it again from the vantage point of a middle-aged dad living in the suburbs. This time, I didn’t have to rent the movie, find my copy of “Dark Side” or cue it to the lion’s roars. I went into my home office, sat before my computer and clicked a link on YouTube — that was it.
As it unfolded before me, a nagging old thought recurred: How much going on here is objectively special, and how much is in our heads? Back in the mid-’90s, when interest in the phenomenon started to spread, some fans began hunting around for other interesting pairings. A standout website was called the Synchronicity Arkive, whose maker reported enjoying various mash-ups he had tried, including the 23-minute track “Echoes” and the trippy final act of “2001: A Space Odyssey”; “Wish You Were Here” and “Blade Runner”; “Wish You Were Here” and “Akira” — he apparently trusted only Pink Floyd to give him what he wanted. But none of those other purported discoveries took off. Perhaps when any two works are paired, the mind will always notice that some musical and visual shifts happen to coincide. But no other mash-up that I am aware of produces the regular lyrical overlaps that make “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” so special.
Even so, confirmation bias clearly plays a role. Because we are hunting for connections, we overlook the moments when there are none. For example, we filter out that there is no obvious resonance between Dorothy talking to a farmhand and the concurrent lyric “Long you live and high you fly/But only if you ride the tide.” Instead, we focus on a synchronicity with the next couplet, “And balanced on the biggest wave/You race towards an early grave,” which aligns with Dorothy tiptoeing across a fence and then falling into a hog pen. Still, if you were to draw up a list of the asynchronous moments, it would dwarf the alignments that made “Rainbow” so famous.
As I thought about its limitations, I started to ponder a counterfactual: Had “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” been discovered today, would it have been as big a deal? We live in a period in which our phones inundate us with relentlessly churning social media feeds, online games, news and sports updates and an endless number of funny video shorts. To borrow the title of a Waters solo album, we are amused to death. But back in the ’90s, the internet was still in a sort of “Goldilocks zone” — with enough connectivity to be stimulating but not yet so much as to be oppressive. Boredom was then still more possible, and unfilled, mind-wandering time made ideas for trying out weird things more enticing — and perhaps the standard for what manages to be captivating a little lower.
For that matter, the fact that today there is no need to put any effort into creating “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” experience comes at a price. When I was invited to talk about all this on a morning radio program recently, we discussed how when we each first heard about it and tried it out in the ’90s, it took preparation — going out to rent a tape, inviting friends over to participate and worrying about when was just the right moment to start playing the album. “That was an event,” one of the hosts observed.
Now, with precooked versions available to stream online, the experience is diminished twice. Not only does it take far less planning and fuss to replicate the phenomenon, it is also now impossible to mess it up. While watching on my computer, I found myself clicking back when I wanted to experience a particularly striking alignment again, which perversely seemed to drain some of the mystique these coincidences had radiated when they vanished just as one recognized what had happened. Called to deal with a family issue, I hit pause, got up and walked out of the room. When I later returned to the screen, I found the video still paused on the same frame, its synchronicities waiting to seamlessly resume when I clicked the mouse. “The Dark Side of the Rainbow” had been made easy, thanks to countless technological miracles — but also, somehow, less magical.
Charlie Savage is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and a Washington correspondent for The New York Times. He is the author of “Power Wars,” an investigative history of national-security legal policymaking in the Obama administration.
Matt Curtis is an art director and designer living in London. He is a design director at Uncommon Creative Studio.
Source video: “The Wizard of Oz” (MGM). Source audio: Pink Floyd, “The Dark Side of The Moon” (Capitol Records)
Sony Pictures International Productions and Italy’s Colorado Film have teamed up on Italian comedy/road movie “50km per Hour” which has started shooting with multi-hyphenate Fabio De Luigi directing and starring.
The film is an Italian remake of Sony’s 2018 German box office hit “25 Km/h,” written by Oliver Ziegenbalg and directed by Markus Goller about two estranged siblings who reunite at their father’s funeral and make a spur of the moment decision to fulfill their childhood dream of driving across the country on their old motorbikes. It has also recently been remade in Mexico with the title “A Todas Partes” (“All the Places”).
De Luigi, who is among Italy’s most bankable talents, recently starred in “The Worse Week of My Life” and “When Mom is Away,” which was Italy’s top grossing local title during pandemic-stricken 2019. De Luigi on this film is pairing up with another top local box office draw, Stefano Accorsi (“The Goddess of Fortune”). (See First Look photo: Fabio De Luigi, on the left, and Stefano Accorsi, on the right).
Also starring in “50 Km/h” are Alessandro Haber (“The Unknown Woman”): Elisa Di Eusanio (“Doc – In Your Hands”); Alice Palazzi (“Squadra antimafia – Palermo oggi”); Simone Baldasseroni (“Three Perfect Daughters”); Giorgia Arena (“Bang Bang Baby”); Barbara Abbondanza (“The Italian Recipe”) and Paolo Cevoli (“Soldato Semplice”).
The film, on which De Luigi is also serving as writer besides director and star, is being shot in the multi-hyphenate’s native Emilia-Romagna region, as well as a few other locations in Italy.
Alessandro Usai and Iginio Straffi of Colorado Film, which is owned by Straffi’s Rainbow Group, serve as producers on the film, which is the second of a multi-picture deal between SPIP and Colorado. The first film was “The Price of Family” which debuted at number 1 on Netflix Italy in December 2022.
“We are thrilled to continue our creative collaboration with Colorado Films and for the opportunity to work with such a prestigious and talented filmmaker and star like Fabio De Luigi,” said Shebnem Askin, EVP, creative production and head of Sony Pictures International Productions in a statement.
“We are looking forward in bringing this film to local Italian cinemas – which marks the first local theatrical release for Sony Pictures International Productions – and to continue our commitment to produce content in Italy,” she added.
“50km per Hour” will be released theatrically by Sony Pictures Releasing International in Italy via Eagle Pictures which handles Sony titles on the Italian market.
Said Usai, CEO of Colorado Film: “We are very happy to partner with Fabio De Luigi as a protagonist for the 10th time and as a director for a third film. After so many successes together, we are confident that this new project, which is also enriched by the acting of Stefano Accorsi, will be appreciated by the Italian audiences in the next season.”
Hemsworth thought it was “really cool” to include her in the process, though he also said it felt like “a one-off, fun family experience.”
This is an interesting stance, considering the role in question is now the child of an Avenger, not just a throwaway role.
Limited Acting for India Rose?
Marvel
In an interview with Entertainment Tonight, Thor 4 actor Chris Hemsworth revealed his thoughts on his daughter doing more acting.
When it comes to her small role in Love and Thunder, the actor claimed that “was supposed to be just a super quick little moment in the film:”
“You know, that was originally supposed to be just a super quick little moment in the film, and then the character expanded due to the story changing… I said, ‘Oh, do you want to do some dialog in the film?’ And she’s like, ‘Yeah, cool!’ And she was a pro and loved it.”
The actor reasoned that he “[wants] her to have a childhood,” something he thinks she does have. Hemsworth did add that when she’s older, and if she’s “keen to do more things,” then he’s all for it.
He went on to share that he told her daughter “there’s plenty of time:”
“But I said, ‘There’s plenty of time, sweety. Go to school, horse ride, have fun, be a kid,’… Because once the train moves, it’s pretty hard to get off, and you miss a lot of things.”
The Ever Evolving MCU Plan
Going off of Chris Hemworth’s quotes, it seems that the plan wasn’t always for Gorr’s child to become Thor’s defacto child.
After all, Hemsworth is smart enough to know that the role of his character’s kin would be huge for the MCU. So his hesitancy makes sense if the original intention behind his daughter’s cameo was never for her to be the daughter of a founding Avenger.
Now fans are left wondering what the play will be when Marvel wants Thor back into the picture. One would have to assume that will also include India Rose’s original character—who is also a product of Eternity, which could easily become a massive plot point for films like Avengers: The Kang Dynasty or Secret Wars.
Review: Wonder Woman #800 [Editor’s Note: This review may contain spoilers]
Writers: Becky Cloonan & Michael W. Conrad and Tom King Art: Joelle Jones, Alitha Martinez, Mark Morales, Nick Robles, Todd Nauck, Skylar Patridge, Cully Hamner, Jen Bartel and Daniel Sampere Colors: Jordie Bellaire, Tamra Bonvillain, Jen Bartel and Tomeu Morey Letters: Pat Brosseau and Clayton Cowles
Reviewed by: Matthew B. Lloyd
Summary
Wonder Woman #800 wraps up “Whatever Happened to the Warrior of Truth?” that concludes the Becky Cloonan and Michael W. Conrad run on the character while also introducing the new team of Tom King and Daniel Sampere in a story called “Trinity” that introduces readers to Wonder Woman’s daughter.
Positives
Wonder Woman #800 opens with Diana in the jungles of Brazil with Yara Flor, and the art is simply incredible. Joelle Jones who did the heavy lifting on Yara Flor in her solo series makes you lament the short life that series had. The art is simply BREATHTAKING. Daniel Sampere also does a nice job on “Trinity,” but Jones is the standout artist of this issue. The design on Trinity aka Lizzie Marston Prince is good. She has enough references that she feels like a legacy character. Plus, her name is a tribute to William Moulton Marston’s (Wonder Woman’s creator) wife, Elizabeth.
As Diana continues what she began in Wonder Woman #799, she traverses the hopes and dreams of her super-powered allies, Yara, Donna Troy, Cassie and of course, Bruce and Clark. Again, we get personal insight into how these characters view Diana and vice versa. Not surprisingly, they each have a slightly unique angle, but they all skew positive which makes sense. Combined, it’s a fitting tribute to Wonder Woman in the vein of “Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?” as mentioned in the review for #799.
Positives Cont’d
As Diana visits her friends, there are some interesting passages that stand out. What is said between Donna and Diana almost sounds like an apology for Donna getting left by the wayside as her place in the Wonder Woman mythos has been supplanted twice. Donna has never been able to get her due on her own like Dick Grayson, despite being just as deserving of it. It’s a nice acknowledgement of what’s happened to her character over the since Crisis on Infinite Earths made her more and more difficult to explain.
Additionally, when Diana meets her mother on her journey, her mother speaks to her in a way that references her original origin as a clay figure molded by Hippolyta’s hands into which the gods breathed life. We know Diana is still currently the daughter of Zeus, but it’s a nice touch by Cloonan and Conrad to reference this traditional origin. Somehow, Hippolyta’s speech also works as a backhanded critique of the daughter of Zeus origin. Hippolyta’s words of encouragement outline how the original origin makes Diana a more unique and special character. This is a very clever bit of writing because it works as straightforward encouragement of Diana by Hippolyta, but it is also clearly an argument for restoring the clay figure origin.
Negatives
While some of the art sequences in “What Ever Happened to the Warrior of Truth?” appear to be a bit rushed, the bulk of the negatives for Wonder Woman #800 come from “Trinity.” Tom King is a polarizing writer, at times even being divisive to a single reader in a single issue. Often, he can execute a script with technical excellence, but fail to capture the spirit of a character. Despite this he can sometimes capture Beauty as seen in Superman: Up In the Sky and Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow. With “Trinity,” King leaves this reader with an overwhelming sense of dread. Not excitement, not engagement, simply dread.
The idea of Wonder Woman having a daughter to pal around with Damian Wayne and Jon Kent sounds like a good idea on paper. The trio doesn’t even look bad together. However, you can only make a first impression once, and Lizzie doesn’t come off well, here. There’s nothing wrong with a confident, strong and independent female character…look at Power Girl. Unfortunately, there’s nothing charming or endearing about Lizzie. She seems to be a classic “Mary Sue.” But, it goes even further, she tells Jon and Damian how great she is spending the first half of the story belittling the erstwhile Super Sons. King knows what he’s doing, he even has Damian make a comment under his breath that reveals what Damian thinks of Lizzie.
Negatives Cont’d
While it’s always great to have the Super Sons together, and I do want to see the babysitting story that’s teased, King writes these adult versions of Jon and Damian as if they were still 10 and 13 respectively. Their banter shows no signs of maturity and they are far too deferential to Lizzie as they appear to be drinking her Kool Aid. King manages to cobble together bits and pieces of a mystery, but with the little we get it feels like waiting for a car wreck. Will readers not be able to turn away when Wonder Woman #1 (Legacy #801) hits the stands in September?
It’s hard to put my finger on it exactly, but when reading “Trinity,” I was reminded of what happened 200 issues ago in Wonder Woman #600. DC attempted to do an in continuity reboot of the character with the “Odyssey” storyline complete with new costume. With Lizzie, it looks like DC will finally get long pants on Wonder Woman. “Odyssey” retooled everything we knew about the Amazons and Diana. While King’s upcoming run doesn’t appear to be of that order, it feels jarring already. It has a very different spirit than what I associate with Wonder Woman. I suppose the good news is that the “Odyssey” iteration didn’t last very long as it was replaced by another reboot, The New 52 just fifteen months later.
Verdict
Wonder Woman #800 is a story of well…two stories. “Whatever Happened to the Warrior of Truth?” Part Two is a loving look at Diana and her relationships with her super-powered friends. It will make you smile and remind you why Wonder Woman is important and special. As it wraps up and Hippolyta gives Diana her “pep” talk, the language brings the reader full circle with the character as we are meant to see Diana as that figure of clay brought to life by Hippolyta’s love and the will of the gods, reaffirming the themes of love and compassion. Instead of whetting the appetite, “Trinity” leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. I don’t really want to know what happened to get these characters to this point, especially when it would be more entertaining for Damian to shiv her when Jon’s not looking.
Phil Spencer is adamant that consoles are “critical” to Xbox’s business going forward, saying that dedicated gaming hardware is “the future of Xbox.”
In Xbox’s “What’s Next for Gaming?” panel today, the Xbox head was asked about the place of console in Xbox’s strategy. It’s a question some may have been wondering about in particular due to Spencer’s past comments seeming to deprioritize hardware in the grand scheme of the company’s strategy. If that was the case back in 2019, it doesn’t seem to be any longer:
“We know that for players, especially Xbox players, where we come from is people sitting in front of their television with a console plugged into their television. It’s what developers are targeting. It’s what so many of us play. Console is critical to the success of what we’re doing today and the future of Xbox. It’s not the only thing we’re going to focus on. We’re going to focus on allowing player choice. But we know that console is the core of how people think- box is in the name of our product. Xbox. Console is critical to what we are building.”
Spencer added that the team has been hearing positive feedback on the Xbox Series S, noting that “for some people around the planet, $500 for a console is too much for their situation,” and that the price point for the Series S has brought many new customers into the Xbox ecosystem. However, he acknowledged that the 512 GB storage was a limitation for some – hence the announcement today of a 1TB version.
Console is critical to the success of what we’re doing today and the future of Xbox.
“
“We remain very committed to that [console] style of play, the creators who are building for that space, and the pillar that it is for our brand,” Spencer concluded.
Hong Kong action film “The White Storm: Heaven or Hell” will have its North American premiere at the New York Asian Film Festival, where it is a late addition to the line-up. The festival runs July 14–30, 2023 at Film at Lincoln Center (FLC).
Directed by Herman Yau, the film sees Louis Koo, Aaron Kwok and Sean Lau (aka Lau Ching-wan) appear together for the first time. It is set in the ‘Golden Triangle’ region famous for drugs production and trafficking. Kwok plays an undercover cop who infiltrates a drug cartel led by a notorious Thai drug lord (Lau). In classic heroic bloodshed fashion, the two develop a bond of brotherhood. The cop’s only hope of escaping the treacherous jungle region and his ambiguous morality is to somehow contact the superintendent of the Hong Kong Narcotics Bureau, who has solemnly sworn to demolish the cartel once and for all.
The predecessor film “The White Storm 2: Drug Lords” played at the NYAFF in 2019. The festival selection of the threequel aligns with its updated commercial release date in mainland China.
AMTD, the Hong Kong-based digital and financial services conglomerate behind the movie through its AMTD Digital Media and Entertainment, said Wednesday that the release in China had been brought forward by three weeks to July 6.
CMC Pictures has picked up the rights to the film for North America, but it has not yet confirmed a U.S. release date.
Calvin Choi, chairman of the New York Stock Exchange-listed AMTD, is executive producer and executive manager of the film. He described the company as a “one-stop digital solutions platform [that] operates four main business lines including digital financial services, SpiderNet ecosystem solutions, digital media, content and marketing, as well as digital investments. It is the fusion reactor at the core of the AMTD SpiderNet ecosystem and empowers and integrates the various digital businesses within its ecosystem.
Self-published Comic Book author Corissa Grant details creativity, hiring reliable artists who are able to sketch the same language you wrote and how to make this a worthwhile side venture for any other creatives wanting to craft their own comic book formula.
Her newest comic Redemption details Egyptian terror, chaotic action, a sexy duo and plenty of other dark fantasy/horror adventure that should please genre mash-up fans!
Her material can be purchased physically or digitally here:
Netflix is switching things up to provide more clarity to consumers about which of its shows are resonating with viewers.
In the past, Netflix has focused on the total hours watched for its movies and TV series, but now, the streaming service will rank these projects based on the number of views.
To get that number, the number of hours watched will now be divided by the runtime, which gives a more level playing field because some shows have dominated based on having more episodes alone.
To that end, Netflix will continue to show hours viewed per title, but the Top 10 list will be ranked by views.
“We will also extend the qualifying time for our most popular lists from around one month (28 days) to three months (91 days) given that many of our shows and films grow significantly over time,” Netflix said.
As a result, using the new metrics means there are some changes to the All-Time most popular lists, with Wednesday (252.1 million views now outpacing Stranger Things Season 4 (140.7 million views).
Squid Game (265.2 million) remains the most popular series ever on Netflix, but Wednesday leads the English TV chart.
The Top 10 list also includes Dahmer: Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story (115.6 million views), Bridgerton Season 1 (113.3 million views), and The Queen’s Gambit (112.8 million views).
Other international titles also pulled in substantial numbers, with Money Heist Part 4 (106 million) and Lupin Part 1 (99.5 million) coming in behind Squid Game.
Netflix shared some viewership statistics for recent shows, including Black Mirror Season 6, which managed 11.3 million views.
Also, last week: Extraction 2 scored with 43 million viewers, with the original movie joining the list at #2 last week with 9 million views.
It will be interesting to see whether this new way of measuring success lasts.
In the past, Netflix has been known to take statistics within the first 28 days into consideration, but maybe we’ll get to see more shows that start slow and rise, getting a fair shot.
What are your thoughts on the decision?
Hit the comments below.
Paul Dailly is the Associate Editor for TV Fanatic. Follow him on Twitter.
Sweden’s Göteborg Film Festival is in the market for a new Artistic Director.
Jonas Holmberg, who will have led the prominent festival for a decade come January, will step down following next year’s edition. The festival’s board is currently in the process of finding Holmberg’s replacement.
Holmberg was appointed Artistic Director in 2014, succeeding Swedish writer Marit Kapla. During his time at the helm, Holmberg has been widely regarded by industry and local audiences. He has also been credited with raising the profile of the festival, attracting A-list talent, and experimenting with the presentation of films with stunts like Ruben Östlund’s interactive Triangle Of Sadness screening last year.
Holmberg also oversaw Göteborg’s transition into a hybrid festival with a digital platform and established the festival’s streaming service Draken Film as Sweden’s leading VOD platform for arthouse films. Göteborg is now the largest film festival in Scandinavia, with an annual attendance of 270,000 visitors and nearly 2,000 accredited participants.
“Next festival will be my tenth as Artistic Director. It has been a difficult decision, but it feels like a good moment to step aside. We have successfully navigated through the pandemic, and both Göteborg Film Festival, alongside our industry platforms Nordic Film Market and TV Drama Vision, as well as Draken Film, are thriving,” Holmberg said in a statement. “I will be leaving colleagues whom I admire and have learned a lot from, but before that, we will organize one last festival together. We are working intensively to shape the 47th Göteborg Film Festival into something amazing.”
The 47th Göteborg Film Festival will take place from January 26 to February 4.
Aphex Twin has shared “Blackbox Life Recorder 21f,” the first new music from the producer born Richard D. James in five years. Check it out below.
Last week Aphex Twin performed at Sonar 2023 in Barcelona. A post from the Aphex Twin Twitter account instructed fans to “LOOK OUT FOR SOMETHING SPECIAL IN SONAR +D PROJECT AREA AND AT THE MERCH DESK.” Posters with QR codes were reportedly put up in Los Angeles yesterday (June 20). The codes lead to an augmented reality app called YXBoZXh0d2lu; when the QR codes are scanned with the app, music and an animation begins to play.
Earlier this year, Aphex Twin announced that he’ll headline London’s Field Day Festival on August 19. He made a rare social media appearance in three photos Arca posted in June.
In 2021, James joined the early wave of NFT sales, collaborating with Weirdcore and Freeka Tet on a graphic that sold for more than $128,000. Freeka Tet revealed that the NFT’s seed file had additional material buried within it, explaining how to access the other files in a video on Instagram. Fans who followed the steps discovered “April 14” in the files, according to NME.
Prior to the NFTs, James shared a handful of new tracks in the spring before Aphex Twin posters and billboards began appearing without explanation in London, Bristol, Los Angeles, and Berlin in October. His other recent projects include developing a new synthesizer and a software plugin to allow for non-standard synth tunings.
When we watch a movie, we tend to only focus on the characters’ actions and lines. However, movie villains can be even more fascinating when we pay attention to their appearance and mannerisms. What if we delve a little deeper and explore what kind of fragrance these iconic villains would wear? This article combines the art of scent and villainy to create a unique perspective on some of the most terrifying characters in movie history.
If you fancy trying out a new perfume to bring out your inner bad guy, be sure to try perfume samples before you shell out for a full bottle. This will save you a bundle and a huge headache if you splash out on an expensive bottle and don’t like it!
The Art of Scent and Villainy
Scent has a powerful effect on our emotions, memories, and even our behavior. It can transport us to another time and place, or remind us of a particular person or event. So why not use this same principle to explore the inner workings of movie villains?
Have you ever wondered what makes a movie villain so captivating? Is it their cunning tactics, their ruthless behavior, or something else entirely? One often overlooked aspect of villainy is their choice of fragrance. Yes, you read that right – fragrance. A carefully chosen scent can reveal a villain’s personality, enhance their presence on screen, and make them even more unforgettable.
The Connection Between Fragrance and Character
Many psychologists and perfumers suggest that our fragrance choices reveal our personalities and inner desires. So what can we infer about movie villains based on their character traits? It’s no surprise that most villainous characters are known for being ruthless, manipulative, and power-hungry. They also tend to be mysterious and complex, making their fragrance choices equally intriguing.
For example, a villain who is cold and calculating may opt for a fragrance with woody or musky notes, such as sandalwood or patchouli. These scents are often associated with strength and confidence, which aligns with the villain’s desire for power. On the other hand, a villain who is charming and seductive may choose a fragrance with floral or citrus notes, such as jasmine or bergamot. These scents are often associated with femininity and sensuality, which aligns with the villain’s desire to manipulate and control.
How Scents Enhance a Villain’s Presence
Not only can scent reveal a villain’s personality, but it can also enhance their presence on screen. A carefully chosen fragrance can make a villain appear even more menacing and unforgettable. It’s no wonder that some of the most iconic movie villains are remembered as much for their scent as for their actions.
Take the Joker, for example. In the 2008 film “The Dark Knight,” the Joker is known for his chaotic and unpredictable behavior. His choice of fragrance? A blend of patchouli, sandalwood, and vetiver – all scents that are associated with strength and confidence. This fragrance choice not only aligns with the Joker’s personality, but also enhances his presence on screen. It makes him appear even more dangerous and unpredictable, leaving a lasting impression on the audience.
In conclusion, the art of scent and villainy is a fascinating topic that deserves more attention. From revealing a villain’s personality to enhancing their presence on screen, fragrance plays a crucial role in the portrayal of movie villains. So the next time you watch a movie with a villainous character, pay attention to their fragrance – it may reveal more about them than you think.
Iconic Movie Villains and Their Signature Scents
Let’s explore some of the most iconic movie villains and imagine what kind of fragrance they would wear to match their character. Warning: some of these scents may be as disturbing as the villains themselves.
Hannibal Lecter – Sophisticated and Sinister
Hannibal Lecter is one of the most famous movie villains, known for his intelligence, sophistication, and love of fine cuisine. It’s no surprise that he would wear a fragrance that matches his refined tastes. A fragrance with notes of black truffle, whisky, and leather would appeal to his darker side, while a touch of lavender and bergamot would add a touch of elegance.
The Joker – Chaotic and Unpredictable
The Joker is a villain who defies convention by embracing chaos and unpredictability. It’s difficult to imagine him wearing a traditional fragrance, but a scent that combines notes of gunpowder, gasoline, and burnt rubber would certainly suit his anarchic nature. It’s a scent that’s both alluring and repulsive, just like the character himself.
Darth Vader – Dark and Powerful
Darth Vader is a character who represents power, control, and domination. His fragrance would need to match his dark and imposing presence. A scent with notes of leather, tobacco, and cardamom would be fitting for this villain. This fragrance would command attention and respect, much like Darth Vader himself.
Nurse Ratched – Cold and Manipulative
Nurse Ratched is a character who is known for her cold and calculating demeanor. Her fragrance would need to match her manipulative nature. A scent with notes of white floral, jasmine, and sandalwood would be perfect for her. This fragrance is both feminine and alluring, but also disturbing and unsettling, just like Nurse Ratched herself.
Norman Bates – Disturbing and Unsettling
Norman Bates is a character who is haunted by his past and struggles with mental illness. His fragrance would need to reflect this troubled and complex character. A scent with notes of cedarwood, musk, and lavender would be fitting for Norman Bates. This fragrance would be both calming and disturbing, reflecting the character’s inner turmoil.
The Psychology Behind Villainous Fragrances
Now that we’ve explored some examples of villainous fragrances, let’s delve deeper into the psychology behind these choices.
The Role of Scent in Establishing Fear
Scent has a powerful effect on our subconscious minds. In horror movies, the right scent can establish a sense of fear and unease in the audience. By using a fragrance that matches the villain’s character, the audience is further drawn into the unsettling atmosphere of the movie.
How Fragrances Reflect a Villain’s Personality
As we mentioned earlier, fragrance can reveal a person’s personality and inner desires. This is especially true for movie characters, as their fragrance choices are often carefully selected to match their character traits. By analyzing a character’s fragrance, we can gain insight into their motivations and mindset.
The Power of Scent in Storytelling
Finally, fragrance can be used as a powerful tool in storytelling. By adding an olfactory element to a movie, the director can create a more immersive experience for the audience. This can also add a layer of complexity to the movie’s themes and characters.
Crafting the Perfect Villainous Perfume
If you’re feeling inspired to create your own villainous fragrance, here are a few tips to get you started.
Key Ingredients for a Dark and Mysterious Scent
When creating a villainous fragrance, you’ll want to focus on dark and mysterious ingredients. Some popular choices include leather, tobacco, cardamom, and patchouli. These scents are powerful and intense, perfect for creating a memorable villainous fragrance.
The Art of Blending Fragrances for Villainous Appeal
Blending fragrances can be a tricky art, but it’s essential when creating a unique scent. When blending fragrances for a villainous perfume, consider using base notes of leather or tobacco, mid-notes of floral or spice, and top notes of bergamot or lavender. This creates a complex scent that’s both alluring and disturbing.
Tips for Choosing a Scent to Match Your Inner Villain
If you’re looking to choose a fragrance that matches your inner villain, consider your personality traits and motivations. Are you manipulative and cold like Nurse Ratched, or chaotic and unpredictable like The Joker? Once you’ve identified your villainous nature, you can choose a fragrance that matches your character.
Conclusion
Villainous movie characters have always fascinated us, from their actions to their appearance. By exploring the fragrances that these characters would wear, we gain a deeper understanding of their motivations and personalities. Whether you’re creating your own villainous fragrance or just enjoying a movie, keep in mind the power of scent to enhance the storytelling experience.
Armie Hammer and estranged wife Elizabeth Chambers have settled their divorce three years after calling it quits, Us Weekly can confirm.
Both Hammer, 36, and Chambers, 40, reached an agreement on Tuesday, June 20, regarding their property and child and spousal support, according to documents obtained by Us.
“The parties have entered into a written agreement regarding their property and their marriage or domestic partnership rights, including support, the original of which is being or has been submitted to the court,” the documents read. The exes are also asking “the court [to] approve the agreement.” A judge will need to sign off on the documents for the divorce to be finalized.
“It has been an incredible journey, but together, we’ve decided to turn the page and move on from our marriage,” the pair said in a joint statement at the time. “As we enter into this next chapter, our children and relationship as co-parents and dear friends will remain our priority.”
Hammer later found himself embroiled in controversy in 2021 when he was accused of sexual assault by multiple women including an allegation that he raped a woman in 2017. Last month, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office confirmed it was not moving forward with the sexual assault charges after a two year investigation.
“Sexual assault cases are often difficult to prove, which is why we assign our most experienced prosecutors to review them. In this case, those prosecutors conducted an extremely thorough review, but determined that at this time, there is insufficient evidence to charge Mr. Hammer with a crime,” Tiffiny Blacknell, Director of Communications for DA George Gascon, told Us Weekly in a statement on Wednesday, May 31. “As prosecutors, we have an ethical responsibility to only charge cases that we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.”
The statement claimed that the DA’s office has an “ethical responsibility” to only issue charges when the crimes can be proved “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
“We know that it is hard for women to report sexual assault,” the statement continued. “Even when we cannot move forward with a prosecution, our victim service representatives will be available to those who seek our victim support services.”
“I look forward to beginning what will be a long, difficult process of putting my life together now that my name is cleared,” he concluded his Instagram post.
Chambers, for her part, first opened up about the abuse claims in February 2021. “I am shocked, heartbroken, and devastated,” the Criminal Minds alum wrote in a statement at the time. “Heartbreak aside, I am listening, and will continue to listen and educate myself on these delicate matters. I didn’t realize how much I didn’t know.”
The BIRD bakery founder later told E! News in September 2022 that despite the allegations against Hammer, she and the Social Network star were in a “great place.”
“We talk all the time. We’re committed fully and wholly to our children, and to being together as much as possible in a non-romantic way for our kids,” she shared. “Kids need their mom; kids need their dad. So there’s nothing we won’t do.”
Chambers added that her ex — who checked into a rehab facility for substance and sexual issues in May 2021 — is still committed to working on himself.
“Armie has been focused on his healing,” she said. “There’s the oxygen mask theory: You can’t really take care of someone until you are taken care of. There’s a reason on the plane they say, ‘Secure your own mask before helping others.’ He has been very busy securing his own mask. My mask has been secured, [the kids’] masks are on, so right now it’s really been a lot about focusing on them, protecting them.”
She continued: “It’s going to make him the best father, the best person he can be. At the end of the day, that’s the goal. We’re in constant communication and all that matters is that he is the best dad for our children. Obviously he processes everything else that he’s dealing with personally — and that’s his own journey now.”
Despite getting along with Hammer, Chambers maintained that she was listening to the California native’s alleged victims. “I consider myself a feminist and stand in solidarity with anyone who has been a victim of any sort and hope they find healing,” she explained to E! at the time. “I’m not being here, like, ‘My life is amazing,’ because it’s been hell for a long time.”
When Cai Fei visited her then-boyfriend at his home in the Netherlands in 2016, she was appalled to find that breakfast and lunch consisted primarily of whole-wheat bread.
“Isn’t that a human rights violation? Two cold meals a day was just too much for my Chinese stomach,” said Cai, a Beijing-born data analyst who now lives near Amsterdam. The 35-year-old recalled how stunned her partner was the next day, when she whipped up a two-course lunch of thinly sliced flank steak with red and green bell peppers in a savory sauce, as well as scrambled eggs and tomato stir fry.
When she tried to cook another meal, he refused to partake, insisting that no Dutch person has a “big lunch” every day. Instead, he had bread, though he did buy Cai a “most exciting” local treat: buttered bread with chocolate sprinkles, or Hagelslag.
For years, Cai thought she was alone in disparaging the tasteless cold cuts, lukewarm salads and microwaved soups that are staples of contemporary Western urban life. Then, earlier this year, she saw a widely circulated video on the Chinese lifestyle app Xiaohongshu depicting a passenger on a Swiss train putting mustard onto lettuce leaves before stuffing them into her mouth with cold cuts.
A new low for “White people food,” graduate student Huang Jinglan wrote in the caption of the clip she filmed.
Mocking “White people food” is all the rage on China’s heavily censored internet. Tens of thousands of people — many of them Chinese citizens living abroad — have joined Huang in the social media trend of sharing their bland workday meals with the hashtag #WhitePeopleFood. Photos of unseasoned chicken breast, poached eggs, celery sticks, baked beans and dry crackers abound.
Eating these foods for lunch is to “learn what it feels like to be dead,” one user quipped on the Weibo microblogging service.
In China, office workers often visit nearby Chinese restaurants and food courts for an inexpensive midday meal or bring lunchboxes prepared at home the night before. For cost and convenience reasons, that’s not usually an option for Chinese people living abroad, like Huang, a 29-year-old student in St. Gallen, Switzerland.
“But having too much of it can drain the soul and human warmth out of you,” said Huang, who tries to make up for the lack of flavor with hot sauces.
She also obeys the unspoken rule that “White people food” should not be shared, “because we shall not punish others with our self-torture.”
Cultural observers in China say the mockery around #WhitePeopleFood is innocent, and that many Chinese people who use the term enjoy living or working in the West.
“Most Chinese use it as a [form of] self-irony, without any bad intent or the awareness of racial sensitivity in the U.S.,” said current affairs commentator Hong Guangyu, who studies social media trends.
Huang Jinglan saw a woman eating a bag of lettuce and a cold cut wrap for lunch on a train during her trip to Zurich from Lindau, Germany, on May 23. (Video: Huang Jinglan)
China’s upwardly mobile middle classes have consumed Western food regularly since the late 1990s, when international travel took off and people began taking pride in being worldly. But more Chinese people are frequently swapping soup and noodle dishes for salads and sandwiches as the country urbanizes and growing numbers find employment in the private sector. (Giant state-affiliated enterprises often have staff canteens.)
Unlike those early adopters, younger converts see “White people food” as easily accessible sustenance — not as a status symbol. “The love and appreciation of food has served as a significant cultural identity and a means of social bonding for people with a Chinese background,” said Wei Shuihua, a food writer based in Hangzhou, a southeastern city that is the home of slow-cooked beggar’s chicken.
“For burned-out urban professionals, the removal of pleasure from a work lunch” symbolizes how they merely “eat to work,” he said.
The reactions around “White people food” remind some of the stigma that most Asian cuisine has long faced in the United States. The Korean American chef and YouTube star Maangchi, for instance, has written of boiling soup soy sauce outside her house, “where no one will complain.”
“Persistent stigma against Chinese food was closely linked to histories of anti-Chinese sentiment in the U.S.,” said the Chinese American TikToker Lisa Li, a social activist who co-founded a trade journal for Chinese restaurants in New York.
Chinese food was often labeled unhealthy and Chinese restaurants unsanitary, she said — a perception that has shifted over decades with the rise of Chinese American celebrity chefs and writers. Li added that the “evaporation of prestige associated with American food corresponds with the Chinese public’s growing disillusionment” with the United States in an era of intense geopolitical and economic rivalry.
“White people food” does have its Chinese defenders, including people who say such low-carb meals help them avoid postprandial “food comas” and stay awake for work in the afternoon. Others say it has helped them lose weight. Some have also used the time saved from the minimal cooking and dish washing for leisure.
Chinese state media has weighed in, too, citing dietitians who argue that such meals “are not for everyone.”
“This unbalanced diet does little to satiate hunger: It may not meet your daily needs,” Sun Yuanyuan, head of the clinical nutrition department at Hefei No. 2 People’s Hospital, told the state-owned China Food News.
MGM on Tuesday dropped the official trailer for Luca Guadagnino’s Challengers, his new movie starring Zendaya as a tennis prodigy-turned-coach. The love triangle movie, which also stars West Side Story‘s Mike Faist and The Crown‘s Josh O’Conner, hits theaters September 15.
Zendaya plays Tashi Duncan, a force of nature who makes no apologies for her game on and off the court. Married to a champion, Art (Faist), on a losing streak, Tashi’s strategy for her husband’s redemption takes a surprising turn when he must face off against the washed-up Patrick (O’Connor) – his former best friend and Tashi’s former boyfriend.
As their pasts and presents collide, and tensions run high, Tashi must ask herself, what will it cost to win.
The trailer unfolds the trio’s story from an at-times steamy relationship (the film is rated R) in their younger years to the present, when Tashi’s gameplan is threatened by their past.
Justin Kuritzkes wrote the screenplay for the film, which is being produced by Amy Pascal, Guadagnino, Zendaya and Rachel O’Connor. Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross did the music.
Zendaya will be on the big screen plenty in the fall, with Dune: Part Two scheduled to hit theaters November 3.
Watch the Challengers trailer above. Here’s another still from the film below:
If you’re a fan of the “Characters Welcome/Blue Sky” era of the USA Network, you’ll be happy to know that Suits is now streaming on Netflix! Much like Psych, Burn Notice, and Royal Pains, Suitsis an addicting, highly bingeable delight. Starring Gabriel Macht, Patrick J. Adams, Sarah Rafferty, Gina Torres, Rick Hoffman, and… yes… Meghan Markle, the series primarily follows the legal shenanigans of Harvey Specter (Macht) and Mike Ross (Adams). The former is one of NYC’s most-feared litigators, while the latter possesses both a brilliant legal mind and a photographic memory. But here’s the catch: Mike doesn’t actually have a law degree. Originally airing from 2011 to 2019, the series produced 134 episodes, so get comfy and enjoy the show.
“It was billed as the Polish 50 Shades of Grey and the European answer to kinky romance. But remember how 50 Shades just didn’t get BDSM and portrayed the whole thing as an abusive relationship? Yeah, 365 Days is even worse.
The literal plot of the film is a rich gangster kidnaps a woman — for reasons I literally don’t have the willpower to explain right now — and tells her that he will hold her hostage for one year to convince her to fall in love with him, but don’t worry, he won’t do anything without her permission.
It’s a film that actively romanticizes sexual assault and removes all agency from its female lead to the point that when she’s finally reunited with her best friend, the kidnapping is pushed to the side so they can geek out over wedding dresses.”
Life Below Zero: Port Protection Alaska (Season 6, 16 Episodes)
Me & Mickey Shorts (Season 2, 10 Episodes)
Mickey Mouse Funhouse (Season 2, 5 Episodes)
Pretty Freekin Scary (Season 1, 7 Episodes)
Raven’s Home (Season 6, 5 Episodes)
Secret Invasion (Episode 6)
Photo: Disney
Friday, July 28
The Wonderful World of Mickey Mouse: Steamboat Silly (Premiere)
The Wonderful World of Mickey Mouse: Steamboat Silly follows Mickey as he takes a stroll down memory lane by watching old home movies. But, during this activity, Mickey accidentally releases hundreds of “Steamboat Willie” Mickeys from the film reel!
Join Mickey and his friends as he attempts to stop the other Mickeys from causing chaos in town using old cartoon antics!
Photo: Disney
Stay tuned for more Disney entertainment news and updates!
Thanks for visiting MickeyBlog.com! Want to go to Disney? For a FREE quote on your next Disney vacation, please fill out the form below and one of the agents from MickeyTravels, a Diamond-Level Authorized Disney Vacation Planner, will be in touch soon!
At end of Dark Nights: Death Metal, Wonder Woman “died” at the pen of Scott Snyder. The plan was for Diana to ascend to godhood and take her place among the Olympians. Somewhere between that and Wonder Woman #770 something changed. Wonder Woman #769 wrapped up the “Liar, Liar” storyline with Maxwell Lord and his daughter by Mariko Tamaki, which didn’t quite benefit from the synergy it was trying to channel with the just-released Wonder Woman 84 feature film. At the same time in the Future State event that ran in January and February of 2021, the ascended Diana appears in Future State: Immortal Wonder Woman while it seems the mantle of Wonder Woman on the earthly plane would be passed to Yara Flor appearing in Future State: Wonder Woman and Future State: Superman and Wonder Woman. The Future State event was explained as possible futures, but with all the new characters being introduced, it really felt that this WAS the future. There was even this cancelled “5G” event that had been cancelled and it certainly felt like these new characters were the leftovers of that event. So, it was easy to image that Yara Flor would be the new Wonder Woman coming out of Future State if Diana had indeed ascended to a higher plane of existence- the events of Dark Nights: Death Metal seemed to link up perfectly with Future State: Immortal Wonder Woman. However, when Wonder Woman #770 appeared in March, 2021 that’s not quite what had happened. The new writers on the title were Becky Cloonan and Michael W. Conrad who had just chronicled Diana’s adventures in Future State: Immortal Wonder Woman. And, while this certainly appeared to be an indicator that Diana would be depicted in her ascended state…it just wasn’t quite that at all.
“Afterworlds”
Cloonan and Conrad came out of the gate with a 10-part epic story, “Afterworlds.” While it does pick up with Diana in the afterlife where she left by Scott Snyder at the end of Dark Nights: Death Metal, it wasn’t the afterlife as seen in Greek Mythology. Instead, Diana was in Valhalla, where warriors in Norse Mythology are taken by the Valkyries after dying on the field of battle. Diana would make a friend and lover (YIKES!) of Sigfried, Teutonic hero of The Ring of the Niebelung in Valhalla as a little voice in her head urged her to make her way back home. Diana’s trek through the “afterlives” of different cultures finally saw the Amazing Amazon return to Earth.
While this first story arc succeeded in returning Diana to her life on Earth, along the way Cloonan and Conrad added some new characters to Diana’s supporting cast, chiefly Sigfried and they also allowed “Afterworlds” to touch on the major core aspects of Diana’s character- connection to Greek Myth/Legend, fierce warrior, loyal, caring friend and advocate for peace. Some aspects of Diana can seem like a contradiction, but that’s one of the reasons she’s so interesting. As Diana fights along side Sigfried in the endless glory of battle in Valhalla, the reader is reminded of the martial aspect of Diana’s character. Known chiefly for her magic lasso, Diana is also pretty good with a sword and shield.
Diana’s trip through the afterlives leads her to Olympus and the confrontation with Janus as Cloonan and Conrad remind the reader that Diana always has one foot in the world of Greek Mythology. This in turn leads Diana to a trip through the multiverse as Diana and Sigfried stick together through thick and thin. This jaunt through worlds of the DC Universe demonstrate the integrity of Diana to the shared continuity as one of the three pillars of the Trinity along side Superman and Batman.
Finally, the new characters that Diana meets along the way reveal her caring and loyal nature as well as how she engenders the same in others. Be it Sigfried or Ratatosk, the squirrel from Yggdrasil, the world tree. these new friends become as close to Diana due to the quality of her character. Her caring, love and compassion shine through all her interactions with friend and foe
Back In Man’s World
When Diana returns to Earth she wastes no time in trying reconnecting with her friends, Etta Candy, Steve Trevor and the members of the Justice League as well as Cassie Sandsmark and Donna Troy. Once again, Diana’s loyalty and caring nature are highlighted as she sees her friends and colleagues. It’s a reminder that it’s OK for comics to be happy, and it’s OK to feel happy. This positivity echoes Diana’s outlook on life. At this point, Cloonan and Conrad turn to a different aspect of Wonder Woman’s 80 year history. In a genius move, the writing duo begins exploring many of the original themes present in the original Golden Age Wonder Woman stories by Diana’s creator, William Mouton Marston.
While in Asgard, Diana had an encounter with Dr. Psycho, and upon her return she learns that Psycho is peddling a “macho man” campaign. Throughout the storyline he manifests his powers exactly as he did in his first appearance way back in Wonder Woman #5 (1943). Additionally, he utilizes the International Milk Company a company that can trace its first and only (?) appearance to Sensation Comics #7 (1942). Dr. Psycho is playing the long game as its slowly revealed he has some shadowy backers who seem to be behind the whole thing.
Marson’s Themes
Cloonan and Conrad use Psycho’s campaign against women as a way of addressing a theme from Marston’s Wonder Woman’s stories. Marston created the character to to be an heroic feminine alternative for girls in the early comic book industry dominated by male heroes. However, upon inspection of those early issues of Wonder Woman and Sensation Comics, it becomes apparent that Marston isn’t just putting a female character in a male hero’s story, but rather suggesting a completely different approach to viewing the world. This isn’t new, Marson’s agenda is well documented. Marston suggests that love, understanding and compassion are more powerful and more effective than aggression, violence and corporal punishment, approaches typically associated with a masculine bent. Cloonan and Conrad use this theme throughout the run, not only as evidenced by Diana’s personal relationships with friends, but her real belief that she can rehabilitate Dr. Barbara Minerva, the Cheetah. It’s something that goes back to the Golden Age as Diana and her Amazon sisters believe that the original Cheetah (Priscilla Rich) and Paula Von Gunther can be rehabilitated through Amazonian methods based on love, compassion and understanding.
The deeper and subtler themes are paired with some more overt references to the past. Cloonan and Conrad reintroduce Etta Candy’s classmates from Holliday College, the Holliday Girls for a modern audience. As in the Golden Age, the Holliday Girls take no prisoners and are always capable and up to whatever task they take on. We also get to see Barbara Minerva show up in the Golden Age Cheetah costume of Priscilla Rich. Even one of Diana’s earliest foes, the Duke of Deception was brought back in a storyline.
The most interesting reference to Wonder Woman’s past occurs when Sigfried joins Diana on Earth and Steve Trevor takes the legendary warrior on as a roommate. While Steve and Sigfried never do more than become great friends, they are written with a certain sensitivity. At this point, Diana is essentially stuck with two suitors, Sigfried and Steve. The two men maintain a friendship knowing that they both love Diana, but they never let it get in their way. And, Diana, never treats one more intimately than the other. Cloonan and Conrad have developed the mirror image of Marston, his wife and his live in lover. Marston, despite being a professed feminist had no problem having a wife and mistress in an open relationship. Diana, Steve and Sigfried never engage in any sort of romantic encounters all together, or separately, but it’s clear that Cloonan and Conrad are paying homage to Marston and his unique view of the committed relationship.
Wonder Woman Interrupted
During their tenure on Wonder Woman, Cloonan and Conrad were required to navigate two events that impacted the stories they were in the middle of telling. It’s important to note that even though they gave their all and backed both events with enthusiasm, these events clearly interrupted what they were doing on Wonder Woman. However, they never gave any indication how they felt about! “Trial of the Amazons” split up the first part of the Dr. Psycho storyline. The death of Hippolyta in that story seemed odd as Diana had just gone through the whole “ascension” bit herself recently. More importantly, it distracted from the main Wonder Woman title. It didn’t flow easily back and forth and the event truly felt forced.
The more recent Lazarus Planet event didn’t just distract, it seemed to truncate what would’ve been a much longer and incredibly interesting third act to a story arc. Wonder Woman #795 ends on a surprising cliffhanger/ turn of events in which the population of Washington, D.C. has been affected by Eros into loving Diana…TOO much. The pace of the arc certainly feels like this will be explored over a few issues, perhaps even right up to a resolution in issue #800. However, it’s wrapped up really quickly in issue #796 with that issue heading right into Lazarus Planet. As the next two issue serviced the Lazarus Planet event, it doesn’t take a lot to figure out that Cloonan and Conrad were being team players despite their final story arc being truncated.
Dawn of DC?
Wonder Woman #800 the last issue to feature Cloonan and Conrad as the writers with DC Comics having decided to go in a different direction for the Dawn of DC. Tom King’s first story also appears in issue #800 with his first full issue in a relaunch in September with a new #1 (Legacy #801). The Dawn of DC banner is supposed to indicate a sort of “back to basics” for characters with good jumping on points. Having already seen the solicit for new Wonder Woman #1, it doesn’t sound much like “back to basics” for Diana. If anything, it sounds like a rehash of themes in “Amazons Attack” from 2007. One can’t criticize king for nostalgia for a favorite era, but that wasn’t an even that went over that well at the time, and it certainly is about as far away from a “back to basics” approach that one could imagine. Diana as Public Enemy #1 is more along the lines of King’s tendency to deconstruct the characters he writes (there are a few exceptions) rather than lean into what makes them tick. Ironically, the entirety of Cloonan and Conrad’s run WAS a “back to basics.” After restoring her to the world of the living from the afterlives, the writing duo brought back themes rooted in the essence of the character as well as restoring classic elements to the series.
The same can be said for Jeremy Adams on The Flash. Adams spent his entire run undoing the damage to Wally West perpetrated on the character in Heroes in Crisis (by Tom King!) and returning the character to the status quo for which fans had been clamoring. This is evidence that DC Editorial doesn’t really know what it’s doing, it struggles to tell what’s good and what fans want. King’s Wonder Woman may sell, but it’s won’t be because it’s a good interpretation of the character (it may or may not be) but, rather because King is a polarizing and controversial writer. More people will pay to watch a traffic accident than an act of kindness.
“Whatever Happened to the Warrior of Truth?”
Wonder Woman #799 and #800 conclude Becky Cloonan and Michael W. Conrad’s run on Wonder Woman. cleverly they channel a classic Superman tale as they adapt the format of “Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?” (Neil Gaiman did the same thing for Batman with “Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader?”). This final tale by the duo revisits the character not so much as events in a life or a history, but rather an exploration of the themes that make Wonder Woman who she is. It’s fitting that their run ends with the themes that have made it so good. Perhaps, the cleverest bit is at the end of Wonder Woman #800 is when Conrad and Cloonan appear to have stealth restored Diana’s original clay figure origin. It’s subtle, but Hippolyta gives Diana what amounts to a “pep” talk and the language references the original clay figure origin. It’s smart. It works on two levels, reminding the reader that love and compassion are at the core of the character. Whatever comes next for Wonder Woman, this run will stand as a unique, interesting and intelligent run by creators who truly understand the character.
Square Enix’s cutesy Final Fantasy-themed racer, Chocobo GP, has had a surprise resurrection this week, with the game re-releasing on Switch with no trace of microtransactions.
The game had a rocky launch due to controversy over aggressive monetizations and grindy battle passes, which led to Square Enix discontinuing its main in-game currency, Mythril, and releasing its last major content update just nine months after launch. The update stated that after Season 5, released on December 21, 2022, there would be no further updates to add new maps or characters, and no more battle passes. Sales of Mythril were stopped, with the currency removed from the game altogether on January 6, 2023.
Size:
Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?
Now Playing: Chocobo GP – Release Date Announcement Trailer
Now, the release date on Chocobo GP’s Switch eShop listing has been updated to June 15, 2023, offering a full, microtransaction-free version of the game. Characters that were previously locked behind microtransactions can now be unlocked with tickets or Gil, both of which can be earned through regular gameplay.
Square Enix has also discontinued Chocobo GP Lite, the stripped back free-to-play version of the game. Players who have already downloaded the Lite version of the game will be able to keep playing it, but they also have the option to purchase an upgrade to the full title.
The full game is selling for $50 on the Nintendo eShop, with the upgrade from Chocobo GP Lite costing the same.
The products discussed here were independently chosen by our editors.
GameSpot may get a share of the revenue if you buy anything featured on our site.
It seems like every generation has some sort of technology that defines their era, but if you’re a millennial, it feels like we’ve been a part of such a huge tech boom that we’ve been defined and redefined half a dozen times. From the internet to social media to streaming and now to AI, things keep changing at an increasingly rapid pace.
During this whole time, we’ve seen filmmakers tackle stories involved in the present day, and some tell stories in the past that seem to echo now.
Christopher Nolan has been amidst all of these movements, from his spyware in The Dark Knightthat seemed to harken to the Patriot Act to the environmental crisis in Interstellar that delivered a warning about the future of our planet, he’s someone with his finger on the pulse.
Now, his new movie, Oppenheimer, takes us back to the 1940s to look at the invention of the atomic bomb and the fallout from its creation.
What Does Oppenheimer Have to Say About the World Today?
For Nolan, it’s a movie about a creation that changes the course of human history that then haunted the rest of the years that followed with the Cold War and the increasing power humanity had to destroy itself.
In a recent interview with Wired magazine, Nolan talked about these implications. When the interviewer brought up AI, he balked at its likeness to the atomic bomb but did go into how it is changing the world.
At first, Nolan stated, “I think the relationship is an interesting one. It’s not the same. But it’s the best analogy—which is why I used it in Tenet—for the dangers of unthinkingly unleashing a new technology on the world. It’s a cautionary tale. There are lessons to be learned from it. Having said that, I do believe the atomic bomb is in a class of its own as far as technologies that have changed and endangered the world.”
‘Tenet’Credit: Warner Brothers
But he also was willing to dissect the worry around AI and the public perception of the tool. Especially as people worry they’ll be out of jobs because of the technology.
Nolan said, “That’s part of the problem. Everybody has a very—call it a partisan point of view. The issue with AI, to me, is a very simple one. It’s like the term algorithm. We watch companies use algorithms, and now AI, as a means of evading responsibility for their actions.”
When prompted to expand on this, Nolan continued, “If we endorse the view that AI is all-powerful, we are endorsing the view that it can alleviate people of responsibility for their actions—militarily, socioeconomically, whatever. The biggest danger of AI is that we attribute these godlike characteristics to it and therefore let ourselves off the hook. I don’t know what the mythological underpinnings of this are, but, throughout history, there’s this tendency of human beings to create false idols, to mold something in our own image and then say we’ve got godlike powers because we did that.”
So, what, if anything, could AI be used for in filmmaking?
Nolan had an answer for that.
He said, “… The whole machine learning as applied to deepfake technology, that’s an extraordinary step forward in visual effects and in what you could do with audio. There will be wonderful things that will come out, longer term, in terms of environments, in terms of building a doorway or a window, in terms of pooling the massive data of what things look like, and how light reacts to materials. Those things are going to be enormously powerful tools.”
‘Oppenheimer’Credit: Universal Pictures
When asked if he would use AI personally, he gave a thoughtful answer.
“I’m, you know, very much the old analog fusty filmmaker. I shoot on film,” Nolan said. “And I try to give the actors a complete reality around it. My position on technology as far as it relates to my work is that I want to use technology for what it’s best for. Like if we do a stunt, a hazardous stunt. You could do it with much more visible wires, and then you just paint out the wires. Things like that.”
Nolan went on to explain even further, going into the idea of using AI for visual effects. He said, “It’s not starting from nothing. It’s starting from a much more detailed and data-driven idea. It might finally break the barrier between animation and photography. Because it’s a hybrid. If you tell an artist to, say, draw a picture of an astronaut, they’re inventing from memory or looking at references. With AI, it’s a different approach, where you’re actually using the entire history of imagery.”
I thought these were very thoughtful answers for a tool that feels like it is still in its infancy, but also for a filmmaker so intent on keeping cinema within our society. The truth is, we don’t have a lot of answers about AI because it is so new. That’s why it’s so important to protect human jobs right now, and then walk the fine line of learning how we can use AI to our advantage.
What did you think of Nolan’s responses? Let me know in the comments.
In 1977, Mia Farrow came “full circle” and returned to a character trope that she seems to do best – a confused and sorrowful woman battered by what could be considered supernatural forces. Nine years after her fantastic portrayal of Rosemary Woodhouse in Polanski’s Rosemary’s Baby, Farrow starred in another film based on a horror novel, this time an adaptation of Peter Straub’s Julia directed by Richard Loncraine. This is not the story of a mother soon to be, though, but of a woman who loses her daughter to a tragic accident and soon begins to experience the ghost of another little girl haunting her new mansion. The grief motifs are similar, but here Farrow teeters on the brink of psychological breakdown due to her own guilt rather than the manipulation from those around her.
Loncraine’s film is a slow burn – at times, perhaps a bit too smoldering for its own good. The Haunting of Julia quickly sets up the main conceit with a traumatic opening sequence that finds Farrow’s Julia performing a failed tracheotomy on her choking daughter, featuring a haunting shot of her bloodied that mimics the film’s unsettling final frame. From there, she moves into a gigantic house by herself after separating from her useless husband Magnus (Keir Dullea), where the film sort of stagnates in its depiction of supernaturality. Loncraine uses a lot of the same ideas that were heavily favored in ghostly films at the time, and Haunting tends to focus more on the investigatory aspect of the disturbances than the scares themselves.
This gives the film a very languid pacing, and while it’s clear that Loncraine is focused on ensuring Julia is a rounded character with just enough mystery to keep the audience suspicious of her unreliability, the film never really manages to get into a groove. All of the right tropes are here, from the beautiful Gothic elements of the mansion to poring over old newspaper clippings for a past child murder to multiple grisly “accidental” deaths, but it doesn’t come together in the most cohesive whole. It doesn’t help that the film’s conclusion refrains from providing a solid answer to the question of whether anything supernatural was actually going on – The Haunting of Julia sort of wants it both ways, but that loses some of the impact of the admittedly disturbing motherly guilt of the storyline.
With that said, The Haunting of Julia certainly does have its effective moments steeped in existential dread, and its grisly subject matter gives it a punchy statement rather than relying on the formulaic elements of folks moving into a randomly haunted house. Loncraine’s final scene is obviously the one with the most power to stick in the viewer’s brain, but it’s at the expense of forcing the viewer to sit through a film that doesn’t engage as much as it should.
CHECK OUT
Full uncompressed screenshots from this Blu-ray.
Blu-ray
Imprint has released The Haunting of Julia on Blu-ray as number 218 in their series of collector’s edition packages. For this release, the film has gotten a new 4K scan of the original camera negative, which is presumably a different transfer than the one that Scream Factory recently provided on their own 4K UHD release of the film since that one notes it was a specific restoration by Scream Factory. This transfer looks quite good with a nice filmic texture to it; grain scale is about medium-bodied and not chunky or obstructive for the most part, and overall detail is noticeably high despite the film’s employment of anamorphic lens and soft focus. This is a movie that certainly would benefit from the use of HDR to manage some of its extreme black levels, but Imprint’s transfer does a very good job of keeping those blacks deep and dark without suffering from any noticeable crush, and in comparing screenshots from the Scream Factory Blu-ray version of their release, this offering looks right in line with that transfer in terms of both color palette and overall depth. All told, this is a great transfer that just so happens to come at an inopportune time as a 4K release, but if upgrading isn’t something you’re interested in, this looks to offer much the same video fidelity.
Imprint offers an LPCM 2.0 mono track for this release, which I thought sounded fine from a score perspective but which seemed to have a good bit of muffled dialogue. I don’t have Scream Factory’s 4K UHD to verify if this is simply a source issue or something more with the LPCM track; it is worth noting that Scream’s is slightly different in that theirs is a DTS-HD MA 2.o mono track instead of the LPCM. However, it’s not an overly problematic issue, just something that does seem to crop up again and again in the audio output. English subtitles are also included.
For extras, Imprint has assembled a number of new and different features from Scream Factory’s release. A new audio commentary with director Richard Loncraine and Simon Fitjohn is presumably the same as the one on the SF 4K, and the only shared offering between the two. Imprint also features another new commentary track with Jonathan Rigby & Kevin Lyons for more contextual information about the film, both of whom seem to have a visceral appreciation for the movie. A new interview with composer Colin Towns gives insight into the creation of the soundtrack and a discussion about the origins of his music career. Director of Photography Peter Hannan provides a half-hour interview sharing anecdotes about working on the film, namedropping some other crew members on the production, and commenting on the beautiful locations. Associate Producer Hugh Harlow gives a fairly brief interview of being brought into The Haunting of Julia‘s production.
This release also offers an excellent visual essay from Kat Ellinger that explores motherhood and Gothic horror, including but not limited to The Haunting of Julia; she also ventures into the various Gothics that Mia Farrow starred in, including a breakdown of Rosemary’s Baby, and compares to some of the other haunted house-style Gothics released in novel form around the same time period. Finally, a theatrical trailer and the option to watch the film with its original title card Full Circle are included.
This package also comes with a sturdy 3D lenticular case and a CD soundtrack disc with two unreleased tracks by Colin Towns. A full-color booklet featuring an essay by Sean Hogan comparing the film to Peter Straub’s novel Julia is another large bonus. Reversible cover artwork is included for the Blu-ray case.
Extra Features
NEW 1080p High-definition presentation on Blu-ray from a 4K scan from the original negative
Option of The Haunting of Julia and Full Circle opening credits
NEW Audio commentary with director Richard Loncraine and Simon Fitzjohn
NEW Audio commentary with film historians Jonathan Rigby & Kevin Lyons
NEW “Breaking the Circle” – Video interview with composer Colin Towns (1080p; 14:12)
NEW “Framing the Circle” – Video Interview with cinematographer Peter Hannan (1080p; 27:15)
NEW “Joining the Circle” – Video Interview with associate producer Hugh Harlow (1080p; 7:00)
NEW “Motherhood & Madness: Mia Farrow and the Female Gothic” – Video essay by film historian Kat Ellinger (1080p; 23:42)
Theatrical Trailer (1080p; 0:33)
Optional English HOH subtitles
NEW 3D lenticular case
NEW remastered CD soundtrack
NEW Special collector’s booklet featuring an essay by Sean Hogan
Reversible cover artwork
Verdict
The Haunting of Julia is a solid Gothic horror film where Mia Farrow shines despite a glacial pacing. Imprint’s new Blu-ray release comes at an inopportune time due to Scream Factory’s new UHD, but the exclusive extra features – including lenticular case, CD soundtrack, and essay – make this worth a purchase if the pinnacle of video quality isn’t a must-have.
Hosting screenshots is expensive. If you want to see more galleries, consider donating!
According to Sylvester Stallone, when Adele bought his old Los Angeles mansion for $58 million in 2022, she practically threatened to blow up the deal if Sly didn’t include one specific piece of memorabilia in the sale: A bronze statue of Rocky Balboa that stood above the house’s pool.
“[Adele] said, ‘That’s a no deal. That’s gonna blow the whole deal.’ She wanted the statue,” Stallone said in an interview with the “Wall Street Journal” released Monday.
The sale did indeed go through last year, per the L.A. Times, and she’s presumably staring into the Italian Stallion’s bronze eyes at this very moment.
“I like what she’s doing,” Stallone added of the singer’s renovations to his former home. “She’s making it gorgeous.”
The house is a 21,000-square-foot marvel, sitting on 3.5 acres of land in the Beverley Park neighborhood of L.A. — an area in which stars like Magic Johnson, Justin Bieber, Denzel Washington reside. Beyond the statue, the house features eight bedrooms, 12 bathrooms, several patios and terraces, a two-story foyer, a gym, a putting green, a movie theater, a custom bar, and a cigar room complete with an air-filtration system.
Despite the endless amenities, Adele snagged the house for a bargain, as it was originally listed at nearly double the price she paid: a whopping $11o million.
Per the L.A. Times, there were at one point two Rocky statues — one in a memorabilia room in addition to the one by the pool. Did Adele keep that one as well, or was Sly able to pry it away from the “Hello” singer? The world may never know.
25 years ago this week, Mulan hit theaters, and the 1998 Disney animated feature is just as exciting of a watch today as it was when it was first released. It follows Fa Mulan (voiced by Ming-Na Wen and Lea Salonga), the ambitious daughter of an aging warrior whose family believes she’ll bring honor to their name. A series of mishaps lead Mulan to be labeled a disgrace, and when her father is conscripted into the military once again, she does the unthinkable; Mulan cuts her hair and disguises herself as a man to take her father’s place in the army. Mulan has a great story, loveable characters, but most of all, the music is where the movie really shines. While it only has four musical numbers, all of which appear in the first half of the movie, each one is memorable — “Honor To Us All” sets up the story, while “Reflection” is a closer look at Mulan herself, and “I’ll Make A Man Out of You” and “A Girl Worth Fighting For” both give viewers a deeper understanding of Li Shang and his army, with the latter ending on one of the movie’s more affecting and somber turns. Those catchy songs, some fun sidekicks, and an 87-minute runtime are just a few reasons why I’ve loved Mulan for as long as I can remember.
We’ve all made the “Cop Rock” jokes. The Steven Bochco musical drama, which premiered in fall 1990, was a big swing: marrying original music with procedural storytelling. It was a colossal flop that we still talk about three decades later, and a reminder that musicals are hard.
Music has been a part of the TV landscape going back to the 1950s and shows like “Your Hit Parade.” But few series have successfully integrated regular music performances into their storytelling: “The Monkees” and “The Partridge Family” worked in the 1960s and ’70s. “Fame” did it in the early ’80s. And then “Cop Rock” scared people off the concept.
The 1990s animation boom incorporated music in shows like “The Simpsons” and “Animaniacs.” But not until the 21st century did scripted series really figure out how to make musical numbers work as part of the narrative. “Flight of the Conchords” did it with satiric tracks, while “American Dreams” relied on oldies nostalgia. The late 2000s saw the gantlet of musical shows: “Glee” (a big hit), “Eli Stone” (not so much), then “Smash” (not a smash), “Nashville,” “Empire,” “Crazy Ex-Girlfriend” and “Galavant” (should’ve been a hit). Most recently, “Zoey’s Extraordinary Playlist” was a brief critical fave and Emmy winner (for choreography).
But I don’t know that we’ve ever previously had so many music-intensive scripted series on TV at the same time: Apple TV+’s “Schmigadoon,” Paramount+’s “Grease: Rise of the Pink Ladies,” Disney+’s “The Muppets Mayhem,” Hulu’s “Up Here,” Disney+’s “High School Musical: The Musical: The Series,” Apple TV+’s “Central Park.” And then there’s Amazon Prime Video’s “Daisy Jones & the Six,” which harks back to the age of “The Monkees” — a fake band performing real, original music.
I have a confession to make: I can’t stop listening to the album “Aurora,” by Daisy Jones & the Six. You could have fooled me into thinking this was a real band from the 1970s. The team behind the series, based on the book of the same name by Taylor Jenkins Reid, set out to create something cut from the same cloth as Fleetwood Mac’s landmark 1977 release “Rumours.” And they kind of did.
Prior to the writers strike, I talked to executive producers Scott Neustadter and Will Graham about creating an entirely new band. Said Graham: “The hardest part was we have to make an album that stands with the greats of this period.” Then there came the serendipity of working with music producers Blake Mills and Tony Berg at Sound City Studios in Van Nuys.
Sam Claflin (Billy), Josh Whitehouse (Eddie), Will Harrison (Graham), Sebastian Chacon (Warren), Suki Waterhouse (Karen)
Lacey Terrell/Prime Video
“Sound City is the place where Mick Fleetwood first heard Lindsey Buckingham play the guitar and has this amazing, storied history,” Neustadter notes. If these walls could sing: Elton John, Nirvana, Tom Petty, Guns N’ Roses, Johnny Cash and Red Hot Chili Peppers all laid down tracks there.
“The space of Sound City has this unpretentious magic,” Graham said. “You can kind of feel the ghosts of everyone who’s recorded there. We wanted the audience to be in these rooms with the characters. So that became a huge part of the show and the writing process. We had the unique experience of getting to watch Blake and Tony make this album and write some pieces of that into the script.”
Honestly, the more I hear about Neustadter and Graham’s process in researching for “Daisy Jones,” the more jealous I get. They talked to Bernie Taupin about his long-standing collaboration with Elton John. Sonic Youth’s Kim Gordon shared stories in the writers’ room about what it’s like being married to your bandmate. Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros’ Nora Kirkpatrick was a writer on the show.
Meanwhile, because of COVID-related production delays, the series’ stars, including Riley Keough and Sam Claflin, became more than just actors pretending to be a band. Daisy Jones & the Six turned into something real, and it’s on repeat in my earbuds.
When Terry Crews is feeling it, you can bet everyone feels it.
That happened during Tuesday night’s (June 20) edition of America’s Got Talent, when a collective from Los Angeles, going by the name of Freedom Singers, told their story and shared their talents.
The singers have lived in the impoverished side of Los Angeles, known as “Skid Row,” rubbing shoulders with the homeless and destitute. Performing together is just one way to lift the spirits.
“Skid Row is in the heart of downtown Los Angeles where five people per day die on the streets, houseless people,” explained one of the male singers. “So, for us, Freedom Singing brings us close together; it is that medium that we’ve always used to come together as America.
And with that as the background, the singers launched into a gospel rendition of Red Hot Chili Peppers’ early ’90s hit “Under The Bridge,” an apt song from the California act about sleeping rough.
The performance inspired the entire audience, and all four judges, to stand and applaud. There were tears in the room, and on stage.
“You have a powerful voice, powerful message, it was beautiful, it gave me goosebumps, it made me emotional,” Heidi Klum enthused. “This was a great audition.”
Homelessness, noted Howie Mandel, “you have given it a voice, you have given us a purpose, and it’s a message. This was more than just a song, more than an audition, it was needed. Thank you for informing, entertaining and blowing the roof off this place.”
Sofia Vergara noted, “I think you guys are going to go very far in this competition.”
The performance, concluded Simon Cowell, “was brilliant, it was raw, it was real, I loved the vocals, I loved your chemistry, your friendship. This was a really special audition, I loved it.”
So too did AGT host Crews who, as he thanked the singers backstage, shed some tears.
For the record, the performance earned four yeses.
Ozploitation is exploitation cinema from Australia. So it stands to reason that Swissploitation is precisely what it sounds like — exploitation cinema from Switzerland. However, unlike their counterpart down under, it would seem the Swiss have produced only one title in the genre so far: Mad Heidi. The over-the-top comedic actioner is an entirely crowdfunded independent production written by Trent Hagga, Gregory D. Widmer, Johannes Hartman, and Sandro Klopfstein, with Hartman and Klopfstein also serving as directors.
Circa the 1920s, Switzerland has been under the iron fist of President Meili (Casper Van Dien). It should be noted that the country’s “very Swiss leader” has a German accent. Aside from the cheese bearing his name, all other cheeses are illegal. This gives Meili great power over the import/export of the goods, as well as the freedom to experiment with the food to help him control people better.
Mad Heidi film still
“…Heidi must plan an escape, lead a revolt, eat actually good cheese that won’t make one explode, and get retaliation…”
Heidi (Alice Lucy), all grown from her novel-centric adventures, lives with her grandpa and is in love with the strapping Goat Peter (Kel Matsena). However, when the cheese fascists discover he is selling black-market goat cheese, Goat Peter is executed then and there. This sends Heidi over the edge, but she’s arrested before getting revenge. So now, the imprisoned Heidi must plan an escape, lead a revolt, eat actually good cheese that won’t make one explode, and get retaliation on President Meili for her grandpa and Goat Peter’s death.
Mad Heidi is nothing if not ambitious. The filmmakers put the approximately $3 million they raised to excellent use, as everything goes for broke. The opening features a billboard that says, “Strength through cheese.” While it is a little moment, nothing more than a quick establishing shot, it highlights the team’s dedication to world-building and remarkably silly humor. It also instantly brings the totalitarian regime’s propaganda into focus. An actual second into the movie proper and all that is already on display. That is talent and dedication to a vision at its finest.
Follow MailOnline’s live coverage as rescue teams continue their search for a submarine which has gone missing during a voyage to the Titanic shipwreck: