Throughout history, movies have shown different versions of the future. While a handful of movies have portrayed optimistic renditions of what will happen in just a few years, most of them paint a bleak outcome for the generations to come. Whether it’s a zombie apocalypse or the fall of humanity as technology beats us, cinema has often found a way to turn our greatest fears about the future into terrifying horror stories that feel too real. However, are any of those portrayals actually believable?
Nuclear panic was real in the ’60s, when we were close to a catastrophe, but in the 1980s, amidst the Cold War, there were a few filmmakers who decided to capitalize on the world’s greatest fear. Not the machines, not the zombies, but our own political leaders who would eventually press the red button. Films such as the 1966 docudrama The War Game, and 1983’s Testament and The Day After offered insight into fictional scenarios in which humanity fought to survive. But in 1984, the BBC delivered the final blow. It was the one post-apocalyptic thriller that looked and felt a little bit too real, and which is now finally streaming for modern audiences to witness.
To Call ‘Threads’ Disturbing Is an Understatement
Released by the BBC in September 1984, Threads was a shocking TV movie unlike anything audiences had ever seen before. It follows the residents of a small English city called Sheffield, as they try to survive in the middle of a nuclear attack. Hundreds die during the initial blast, but it’s only the beginning of the end for those who survive. Trust us when we say this one gets pretty realistic and gruesome in its depiction of post-apocalyptic times.
Threads was an outstanding achievement for the BBC and the network’s history of original programming. It just felt like a different kind of television event. A few years ago, director Mick Jackson recalled feeling that the movie was disappointing, as there were no quick reactions from the public:
“After ‘Threads’ went out, there was nothing. Not a single call. I was a little despondent, thinking, ‘Oh God, it must have been awful. I’ve really blown it.’ It was only the next day that I realized that people had switched off their TVs and just sat quietly thinking, in some cases too troubled to go to sleep or maybe not wanting to risk bad dreams. Some people, half jokingly, called it ‘the night Britain didn’t sleep.'”
While Threads wasn’t entirely acclaimed upon its release, it has gained a cult status in recent decades, with many calling it the best of its kind. Without question, it stands among the most important made-for-TV movies ever produced, and it’s one of the few horror-adjacent productions to get a rare critics’ score of 100% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Is ‘Threads’ the Scariest Non-Horror Movie Ever Made?
Not only does Threads offer a glimpse into the realistic aftermath of a nuclear attack, but it does so aggressively, to the point of being relentless and extreme in its depiction of a dark future. This is where it remarkably differs from other nuclear panic movies, as it takes liberties by portraying human survival as leading to an unimaginably hopeless outcome. In this terrifying future, can we call ourselves humans?
Should Threads stand beside other horror movies? It’s far from falling into the conventions of the genre, and leans heavily into war movie territory. Nevertheless, it is undoubtedly scary and nihilistic — a cinematic experience that may leave you shaking when the credits roll after the unthinkable actually happens. The horrific final sequence is easily one of the most iconic in horror history.
So, no. Threads isn’t a horror movie, but a streamer that specializes in the genre has picked it up. Shudder has just added the 112-minute feature to its impressive catalog of scary gems, giving modern viewers the rare opportunity to stream a genuinely disturbing movie that they will never forget.





